Sephardic Rabbi Endorses Concubine Scenario Under Jewish Law
Share this Article
Twitter
Facebook
Digg
Stumble
PrintTags:
Concubine Halacha israel Israel News Jerusalem Rabbinical Court Jewish Jewish concubine Jewish News Jews polygamy Rabbi Abergel Concubine Sephardi Sephardic Jews Sephardic polygamy Shlomo Amar
The Rape of The Levite's Concubine (Judges 19) by Nicolas Fontaine. Source: Emory University Image Archive
A Sephardic Rabbi in Israel has ruled that the taking of a concubine is an act that in certain instances is permissible by halacha, the code of Jewish law.
Rabbi Eliyahu Abergel, a Talmudist who has published dozens of books and thousands of responsa on Jewish law, wrote in his recent publication Divrot Eliyahu (Eliyahu’s Words) that a man prevented from having children, whether because his wife refuses to procreate or because she is unable to, may take a concubine with whom to procreate, because his first wife is “preventing him from building a family and spreading his seed,” adding even that “the concubine may also live with the couple.”
According to some Jewish legal definitions, a concubine is a woman who does not receive a kesuba, or marriage contract, from her husband, emphasizing the difference in social and domestic status between the main wife and the concubine, considered a mistress.
The 64 year old Rabbi Abergel is by no means a fringe voice, holding the title of Chief Judge of the Jerusalem Rabbinical Court and heading the Tzuf Dvash rabbinical school in Jerusalem. Rabbi Abergel was also a previous contender for the title of Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel, a position that eventually went to Rabbi Shlomo Amar in 2003.
It is unclear if concubinage is practiced significantly in communities in Israel, or if it will increase based on the new ruling. However, Rabbi Abergel does relate that his ruling had practical implications for a head of a major Jewish institution, who was allowed to take a concubine after learning his first wife could not bear children.
Polygamy in its many forms has been a hotly contested subject of debate in centuries of Jewish law, most notably under the ban instituted by Gershom ben Judah’s synod of circa 1000 CE. The current ruling is specific to those whose childbearing attempts have been frustrated, and is additionally localized to Sephardi Jews, who have divergent legal customs from their Ashkenazi counterparts. Sephardi and Ashkenazi traditions are sufficiently different to necessitate a separate post of Chief Rabbi in Israel for each of the two traditions.
4:38 pm
If a woman can’t concieve her husband can get a concubine
Therefore
If a man’s seed is of low sperm count n poor value She needs a virile stud to impregnate her!
12:42 pm
I agree. If the man has a low sperm count and it’s HIS FAULLT, something these rabbis could never understand, she should be entitled to get another man.
4:06 am
Rabbenu Gershom’s edict – which was in any case valid ONLY for Ashkenazi communities and was never accepted by the rest of the Jews – has expired long ago since no taqanà can last for over 1,000 years.
No “hotly contested subject of debate” on the matter of polygamy, but opposing views between Ashkenazi and non Ashkenazi Rabbis as far as pilagshoth are concerned ever since the XIII Cent. V.E.
6:22 am
Not true. Rambam, the Sefaradic rabbi of eminence was the first to really come down against pilagshut equating it with harlotry. Since then every famous rabbi I can think of who came within an inkling of supporting it has been Ashkenazi. So it is exactly opposite of what you say. This is indeed pretty shocking.