Saturday, December 3rd | 3 Kislev 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
August 10, 2012 1:36 pm

Tom Friedman – Mistaken or Misleading?

avatar by Yoram Ettinger

Email a copy of "Tom Friedman – Mistaken or Misleading?" to a friend

Related coverage

February 26, 2016 12:55 pm
1

Rubio Comes Out Swinging

US Senator Marco Rubio was cool as a cucumber, appropriately aggressive, and sharp as a tack in Thursday's Republican presidential debate. In...

Tom Friedman. Photo: www.thomasfriedman.com.

Tom Friedman, the New York Times foreign affairs columnist, is perceived to be a Middle East expert.  Is he?

In January and June, 2000, on the eve of Bashar Assad’s ascension to power, Tom Friedman (T.F.) was charmed by Bashar Assad’s background:  a British-trained ophthalmologist; married to a British citizen of Syrian origin; fluent in English and French; President of the Syrian Internet Association.  He compared the eventual Butcher from Damascus, potentially, to Deng Xiaoping, who led China’s economic reforms, modernization and rapprochement with the USA.  Swept by wishful-thinking, T.F. assumed that Bashar could liberalize Syria, attract international investors, normalize relations with Israel, end the Arab rejection of the Jewish State, thus demolishing the Iran-Syria axis and ending Iran’s involvement in Lebanon.  The prerequisite for such an enterprising scenario was an Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights.  However, as expected, Bashar chose to follow in the footsteps of his ruthless father, Hafiz Assad, slaughtering T.F.’s assumptions and Syria’s domestic opposition, irrespective of the Golan Heights, Israel’s policies or existence.

In August, 2006, T.F. told NPR Radio that Bashar Assad’s Syria was not a natural ally of Iran. He maintained that Syria could resume its traditional role as an ally of the pro-US Arab camp of Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Thus, he rewrote Syria’s recent history, which has been consistently anti-US since 1946, as well as pro-Iran since 1979.

In June, 2009, T.F. stated that “for the first time, in a long time, [Middle East] forces for decency, democracy and pluralism have a little wind at their backs.”  He identified a tailwind to pro-American elements, and a setback to Iran’s fortunes, in Lebanon, Iraq and Iran itself.  According to T.F., “the diffusion of technology – the Internet, blogs, YouTube and text messaging via cellphones” – tilted the Middle East in favor of the US. He was determined not to allow the real Middle East to stand in the way of his vision of a Middle East consumed by globalization, modernity, democratization and the Internet. Unfortunately, the increasingly boiling seismic Arab Street from Morocco to the Persian Gulf has repudiated T.F.’s vision.

In February, 2011, T.F. determined that “the Muslim Brotherhood is not running the [anti-Mubarak] show…Any ideological group that tries to hijack these young people will lose…. This uprising feels post-ideological…. The emerging spokesman for this uprising is Wael Ghonim, a Google marketing executive.”

Enthralled by the Arab Spring delusion, T.F. concluded that the Egyptian Street “tried [radical] Nasserism, tried Islamism and is now trying democracy.”  He was convinced that “the democracy movement came out of Tahrir Square like a tiger…. Anyone who tries to put the tiger back in the cage will get his head bitten off…. Witness one of the great triumphs of the human spirit….. The first pan-Arab movement that is focused on universal values….”

T.F. underestimated the surge of the non-Facebook trans-national Muslim Brotherhood and its credo: “Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law; the Prophet is our leader; Jihad [Holy War] is our way; and martyrdom for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”  To T.F.’s frustration, the Muslim Brotherhood aims to consolidate Islamic Sharia’ as the legal foundation in Muslim and “infidel” lands, as a prelude to the reestablishment of the Islamic Caliphate.

T.F.’s pro-PLO, pro-Palestinian stance dates back to his active involvement, while at Brandeis University, in the pro-Arafat radical-Left “Middle East Peace Group” and “Breirah” organizations.  It was intensified during his role as the Associated Press’ and New York Times’ reporter in Lebanon. There he played down Arafat’s and Mahmoud Abbas’ rape and plunder of Lebanon and their intense ties with international terrorism, while expressing his appreciation of the PLO’s protection of foreign media in Beirut.

In September 1993, T.F. welcomed Arafat as a peace-pursuing statesman.  He established moral equivalence between the role-model of terrorism, the PLO, and the role-model of counterterrorism, Israel, as well as between Arafat and Rabin: “Two hands that had written the battle orders for so many young men, two fists that had been raised in anger at one another so many times in the past, locked together for a fleeting moment of reconciliation.”  T.F. provided a robust tailwind to Arafat’s strategy of deception and bamboozling September 1993 statement at the White House: “Mr. President, I am taking this opportunity to assure you and to assure the great American people that we share your values for freedom, justice and human rights — values for which my people have been striving….”

In July, 2000, T.F. posed the question: “Who is Arafat? Is he Nelson Mandela or Willie Nelson?” However, Arafat’s track record is compatible with another metaphor: “Who is Arafat? Is he Jack the Ripper or the Boston Strangler?”

Has Tom Friedman been mistaken? Or, has he been, deliberately,  misleading?

This post first appeared in Israel Hayom.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Mildred Bilt

    We Jews like to belive peace and love and harmony is possible in this world. I remember all my fellow jews waxing rhapsodic over Stalin and communism. Many of them ran to Russia to help with the cause. The more things change, the more nothing changes. So it’s not just TF, it’s a whole bunch of our peace loving dreamy eyed Jews. They are true believers. It’s a very long list. I just tell them to keep their passports current and make sure they can get their hands on sufficient cash for their families. And plan an exit route.

  • DZS

    Or is T.F. just a fricking idiot?

  • jerry1800

    TF believes what he writes, he is delusional and is living in a fantasy world. Nothing to be done about.

  • Carrie Mataraza

    Tom Friedman has always been part of the left idealism that is always and thoroughly fooled with their ideas about “good intentions” of the “other side.” Time after time Friedman has been wrong. Wouldn’t you think that by now he would realize he is not seeing reality, instead writing about how he wishes it could be? HIs beliefs are truly delusional and therefore, harmful in their influence on his readers.

    • The road to hell is paved with ‘good intentions’, perhaps a cliche,but unfortunately recurring like a curse to every generation.

  • Mike P.

    Tom Friedman is a lefty and mistaken because he is deluded by wishful thinking and doesn’t know evil when he sees it.

    At least he is well-meaning!

    He is a prime example of how the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

  • Raymond Stock

    I have known Tom Friedman since 1985: our first contact came shortly after my master’s thesis, which compared the coverage of The New York Times and Le Monde of the 1982 war in Lebanon (in which I rated him the best and most objective correspondent of either paper in reporting the story) appeared in The Middle East Journal. I still stand by that assessment. Over the years we have remained fast friends, agreeing on some things, disagreeing on others (including on some of the issues cited in this article). During the nearly three decades of our friendship, I have had the chance to observe on a great many occasions his considerable passion for the truth–as he genuinely sees it–as well as his deeply-ingrained decency and sincerity. Whatever you think of his positions on anything, I am sure that he is not being deliberately misleading.

    • avi

      “I am sure that he is not being deliberately misleading.” If that’s truly the case, as someone who has read TF’s column for too many years now I have to conclude that i have been right all along, he’s a moron.

    • DaveP

      From the Book of Dave:

      If you believe passionately in a stupid thing, it doesn’t make you passionate… it makes you stupid.

Algemeiner.com