Sunday, October 23rd | 21 Tishri 5777


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

January 10, 2013 3:34 pm

Chuck Hagel, and Whether it is Better for Jews to be Quiet or Loud

avatar by Dovid Efune

Email a copy of "Chuck Hagel, and Whether it is Better for Jews to be Quiet or Loud" to a friend

Chuck Hagel (right) with Bill Clinton (left). Photo: Wikipedia.

The broad spectrum of responses that President Obama’s nomination of former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel has engendered from within the pro-Israel community is noteworthy. Not because there are variances of opinion on what his nomination means for the U.S.-Israel relationship, but precisely the opposite. Almost every major vocal pro-Israel organization and many individual leaders have strongly opposed Chuck Hagel’s appointment because of his stated principles and ideals. However, their reactions to his nomination have been quite different from one another.

The Zionist Organization of America has been straightforward and consistent on Hagel. They have always stood in opposition and are currently active in working to prevent his approval by the Senate.

The National Jewish Democratic Council sharply opposed Hagel in a 2007 post on its website, which it recently removed, before backing the President’s choice to nominate Hagel. High profile Obama backers Ed Koch and Alan Dershowitz both slammed the President’s nomination in interviews with The Algemeiner. While Koch labeled the pick a betrayal, Dershowitz maintained that the choice did not indicate a post-election change of mode for the President on Israel.

Related coverage

October 21, 2016 8:04 am

The New York Times Magazine Unleashes a Bitter Attack on Israel’s Culture Minister

What happens to a New York Times journalist who gets caught blatantly violating the newspaper’s policies restricting the use of...

Significantly, AIPAC, America’s largest pro-Israel lobby has been silent. This despite Hagel’s evangelist opposition to the key, broad positions that AIPAC has advocated, over the last number of years, including and most centrally, sanctions on Iran.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations also appears to have decided to sit this one out, even though their opposition was made clear when Executive Vice Chairman Malcolm Hoenlein strongly criticized the impending nomination in a recent radio interview.

The Anti-Defamation League made the most dramatic about-turn. First accusing Hagel of borderline anti-Semitism and then, after his nomination, ADL head Abe Foxman had this to say: “Senator Hagel would not have been my first choice, but I respect the President’s prerogative.”

J Street emphatically supported Hagel, but then again, their leader Jeremy Ben Ami has said that “Our No. 1 agenda item is to do whatever we can in Congress to act as the president’s blocking back.” I am not certain what about that agenda makes them pro-Israel.

The opposition to Hagel is clear and it comes from almost all quarters of the Jewish and pro-Israel community. Which leads one to the obvious question of why so many major Jewish representative bodies who vigorously opposed Hagel’s appointment have now lowered their guns? And if they are backing down now, in exactly what scenario would they not be prepared to concede?

For most it seems that the calculation revolves around whether they believe that the fight they are picking is one that they can win. Undoubtedly most believe that Hagel will be confirmed, with or without their opposition. Ed Koch used a similar line of reasoning in an interview with The Algemeiner earlier this week, explaining why he backed President Obama even though he suspected that he would renege on his pro-Israel overtures, “He was going to win! There was no question about it. I thought it would be helpful to have a Jewish voice there, being able to communicate.”

So the real big question, for the pro-Israel community, about Hagel’s appointment is whether strong activism even in the face of possible failure, is valuable or prudent?

There are of course times when prudence and diplomacy are called for, especially when dealing with nuanced, high powered and delicate relationships. But for Jews, the danger of allowing injustices to go unopposed has proven disastrous.

Hagel’s appointment should be vigorously opposed by all who have called his record into question for the following reasons.

For the pro-Israel community, a sober evaluation should be made of each relationship it embarks on, considering precisely what is at stake and who the involved individuals are and their intentions. When more is at stake, less risk can be allowed.

In the case of Hagel, with Iran on the brink of going nuclear and the Middle East trending Islamist, there is a vast amount to concern the pro-Israel community and the Western world in general. Therefore the risk profile of having Hagel in the Pentagon is simply unacceptable. This means his insistence that he is opposed to Iran possessing nuclear weapons and his even more outrageous claim to have been a friend to Israel are to be summarily dismissed.

Additionally, President Obama has presented a huge challenge to America’s pro-Israel community calling its effectiveness in advocating for its positions into question. Throughout the last four years many pro-Israel Obama opponents have claimed that whilst the President’s policies have often proven hostile, Congress has remained steadfastly in Israel’s corner. Now Obama is challenging that notion by sending Hagel to the Senate for confirmation. Without meaningful opposition to Hagel’s appointment, the pro-Israel community will have rendered itself obsolete

If there is a time for vigorous and pronounced leadership in America’s pro-Israel community, that time is now. America’s supporters of Israel must speak out loudly and in unison, so, to paraphrase Churchill, if this country remains Israel’s greatest friend for the next thousand years, men will say, “This was their finest hour.”

The author is the editor of The Algemeiner and director of the GJCF and can be e-mailed

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Gunnhild Raudenssen

    Thanks! Jan.

    Israel is the land of Jews! Can you come back to Norway, we need you!

  • Mihai-Robert Soran

    I’m loud. In support of the nomination. It’s good for Jews. Says Danny Ayalon, too. 🙂

  • Jan

    Chuck Hagel has not been nominated to be Secretary of Defense for Israel. He has been nominated to be America’s Secretary of Defense.

    It is time that American Jews put the United States and its needs ahead of the perceived needs and wants of Israel. Stand up for your country if you live here. Otherwise, get out your passport and move to Israel.

    • Steven

      Jan, Thanks for the sanctimonious requirement for your “Israel be damned” loyalty oath. A lot of Americans, including many Jews, in the early 1930’s thought just like you.

      As an American Jew I guess under your view I can oppose Hagel because of his anti-gay remarks and Senate votes; I can oppose him for his position by which Iran will get nuclear bombs; but it is un-American for me to oppose him as he suggests he would do nothing to support Israel as an American ally? I know it’s uncomfortable for you that most Jews as liberals might support the only democracy in the Mideast that has general protections for all. So know this you narrowminded twit, I pay a dump truck full of taxes and as any US citizen I can oppose any one for just about any reason, but the thought that Hagel puts 7 million Jews at risk just happens to be a good one. 60,000 dead Syrians might also tell you why it’s important to oppose isolationists like Hagel now rather than later. Is there anyone else from whom you would require your loyalty oath…other than Jews?

    • jansuzanne

      Dear Jan, I am sorry to say that you have lost sight of the fact that Israel is the ONLY nation in the Middle East that is part of OUR Western civilization. The Jews there are truly on the front lines fighting for the world’s right to be democratic, with our G-d given rights of choice and living in the 21st Century. You are being naive to think that Islamists who still live in the 7th Century will stop their attempts at global Jihad should they be able to defeat Israel. You also ought to look honestly at what is happening in Europe, countries like France, Denmark, Sweden, UK, Spain for starters. Muslins are intimidating everyone there who is not a believer in their Qu’ran. Talk like yours is ‘idiocy’…I won’t call it anti-Semitism, but it is very dangereous to all Americans…even you.

    • AmericanJuice

      THANK YOU FOR CALLING EVERY AMERICAN JEW AN ISRAELI! I guess American Jews don’t have rights either, sounds like Nazi Germany! Jan, why don’t you go back to whatever country or rock your ancestors came from and stop insulting us all!

    • josef

      Ah! There it comes, the questionable loyalties canard. It’s as old as the Diaspora, and has been discredited, along with such “masterworks” as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but to no avail in many quarters. This is precisely my objection as a left/liberal Jewish American to Hagel’s nomination. The last place we need that line of thought, action and deed is the head of the Department of Defense.

  • maz hess

    The us military budget will be cut by 10 percent. The isrealian military industry is afraid, that if hagel will be confirmed they will have to reduce their productions. Thats why their main salesmen like eric cantor are working their phones.