Tuesday, September 27th | 24 Elul 5776

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 27, 2013 7:58 pm
7

Iraqi Ally of Israel on Hagel, “This is Not a Minister of Defense, But a Minister of Chaos” (INTERVIEW)

avatar by Heather Robinson

Email a copy of "Iraqi Ally of Israel on Hagel, “This is Not a Minister of Defense, But a Minister of Chaos” (INTERVIEW)" to a friend

Chuck Hagel visiting Iraq. Photo: Wiki Commons.

On Friday I spoke with former Iraqi Parliamentarian Mithal al Alusi, who has championed counter-terrorism cooperation and normalized relations between Iraq and Israel. This Arab ally of Israel is dismayed by what he sees as President Obama’s abandonment of the liberals and moderates of the Mideast.

In particular, Alusi thinks Obama is signaling weakness in support of genuine liberals and moderates, and appeasement of extremists such as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as well as Islamist extremists in his own country, Iraq. Furthermore, he views the President’s nomination of Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) to the position of Secretary of Defense as a sign of weakness that he thinks is confusing moderates and emboldening Islamist extremists throughout the Mideast.

“What we hear from your country makes us so confused,” Alusi said. “What [potential] American defense minister will say he will never go to war? Such a statement from a high level politician will … push Iran to understand there is no serious position in America.”

Related coverage

September 20, 2016 10:07 am
0

IAF Intercepts Hamas Drone Off Gaza Coast

A Hamas drone that took off from the Gaza Strip Tuesday was intercepted by an Israeli Air Force aircraft just off...

Regarding Iran, Hagel said publicly in 2006, “I do not expect any kind of military solution on the Iran issue … a military strike against Iran, a military option, is not a viable, feasible, responsible option.”

Alusi commented last week, “This is not a minister of defense, it’s a minister of chaos. [Choosing Hagel] makes it seem Mr. Obama is just a joke, American power is just a joke.”

He added, “If a soldier says, ‘I will never go in a war. I am afraid of war, he is not a soldier.'”

Alusi clarified that he believes a military option against Iran’s nuclear program should be undertaken “only if there is no alternative.” But he believes Hagel’s outright statement of refusal to consider the possibility will be interpreted in the Mideast as a sign of weakness, and exploited.

“This is not the best way,” said Alusi. “A minister of defense should be a man who understands that if there is a need, he will move. To have a minister of defense who will never go to war-that is how it’s translated to us-even if there is no alternative … this is dangerous.”

In recent months, thousands of Iraqis have taken to the streets in protest of the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s rule as violence has rocked the nation. Suicide bombers have killed hundreds, sometimes dozens per day, in cities across Iraq including Baghdad, Kirkuk (Kurdistan), and Fallujah as well as smaller towns like Hilla, Karbala, and Dujail.

Alusi believes that the violence is driven by extremist militias, and calls on President Obama to project U.S. power and stop sending what Alusi views as signals of weakness to extremists.

“If you talk to the Taliban, Salafis, Wahhabis, Hezbollah, and the Iranians, you cannot expect peace,” Alusi said. “I would like him to speak in a way this is serious … Iran, the Taliban, Islamist parties, need to feel the U.S. is a superpower, not [that Obama] is a good boy for the Islamists.”

Regarding this week’s Israeli election, Alusi said, “I wish the parties there understand their responsibility after the election that … the safety of human beings should be number one, a very serious goal for the new government.”

Asked what he believes would empower moderates across the Middle East, Alusi urged Obama to make clear his support for them, not the Islamists.

“I would like to say, Mr. Obama, are you interested in peace in the Mideast?” Alusi said. “Are you interested in human rights and values, which your country and everybody paid a big price for? You are supporting the wrong side … If you want to support a free Iraq, don’t [appease] Iranians who are killing our people every day.”

He added, “America should guarantee there will be no major change in the balance of power. If it changes, if Iran gets an atom bomb, we will have a war. If jihadists [continue to] gain power in Iraq and other countries, there will be war.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Marylinpitz

    Obama’s moves may indeed show “weakness,” to those in the Mideast concerned with achieving meaningful democracy but our President’s focus is inclusion of Muslim led governments as much any other form. He does not agree with the ideas promulgated by Western democracies as they would be applied in other countries. He is socialistic, liberal and anti-colonial. Thus, none of his moves or appointments should surprise.

  • Joy

    I hope & pray that Hagel gets a tough grilling in the Senate and that his nomination never goes through! Obama is papering his Ogime with spineless libturds – sending out all sorts of bad messages about the USA and how it intends (or NOT!) to use its power. Pray for the USSA!! (No, that’s not a typo – just restating the name in old Soviet (USSR) style!)

  • Robert Twic

    OBAMA MAY NOT B ABLE 2 GO 2 WAR, IN SUPPORT OF 1 SIDE OR THE OTHER, BECAUSE THE U.S.A. IS ACTUALLY BANKRUPT OR NEAR IT. WHO WUD’ LEND IT MONEY WHEN IT WUD’ B CHEWED UP IN WEAPONRY.

  • M.Otero

    We must always keep in mind Teddy Roosevelt’s admonition, “Walk softly, but carry a big stick.” I believe that there would have been no WWI had he been president instead of Wilson. He was an intellectual of the first degree, but he wasn’t a naive do gooder.

    Do see: Rabbi Arnold J. Wolf, a leftist anti-Zionist activist, Obama’s long time neighbor and mentor in Chicago, to learn more of Obama’s views on Israel.

    • Cogito

      It is foolish in the extreme to imagine that, had TR been president instead of Wilson, WW1 would not have occurred.

      WW1 was the result of historical EUROPEAN complexities that had nothing to do with the US and that the US was incapable of influencing.

      As a national culture, we in the US labor under a narcisistic belief that we can [and should!] influence every issue in the word, even when we know nothing about the regional realities.

  • Patricia

    A weak person has no strength to show. Obama is weak and selects weak people.

    • Cogito

      Obama is weak? How do you explain his fortitude in sending our troops to kill bin Laden?

      Bush was “strong”? Ignorant as he was, he lied to us to invade a country that posed NO risk to us, resulting in the deaths of over 4,000 US service members and over 100,000 Iraqi CIVILIANS, and destabilizing an entire region. He committed IMPEACHABLE crimes and, if the US were truly a country committed to the rule of law, would have been removed from office.

      The people of our country are so poorly informed and so easily manipulated that most of our citizens don’t even know how to pronounce Iraq, and ignorantly pronounce it “Eye-rak”. How many ‘muricans could even locate Iraq or Viet Nam on a map of the world??

Algemeiner.com