Does Brooklyn College Pass the “Shoe on the Other Foot” Test?

February 1, 2013 3:35 pm 2 comments

Karen L. Gould, the president of Brooklyn College. Photo: CUNY.

The decision by the Brooklyn College political science department to endorse the BDS movement—which includes the boycotting of Jewish-Israeli academics—has been “justified” on freedom of speech and academic freedom grounds by the Chairman of the department.  Brooklyn College’s President has said that departments have the right to sponsor one-sided partisan events.  Let’s see if these “justifications” pass the “shoe on the other foot test.”

What would these administrators say if the department of philosophy were to officially endorse the right to life and oppose a woman’s right to choose abortion?  What if the economics department had officially endorsed Mitt Romney during last year’s election?  What if the Spanish department had voted to endorse an academic boycott against Cuban or Venezuelan professors?  What if the department of religion were to officially condemn homosexuality?

I can assure you that both the lyrics and the music would be very different.  The chairman of the political science department, a radical leftist, would be complaining that his academic freedom was being denied by these departments officially endorsing positions with which he disagrees.  The president of the college, known for her feminist views, would not likely remain silent in the face of an official departmental endorsement of the right to life.  Nor would many faculty members justify a departmental condemnation of homosexuality on the ground of academic freedom or freedom of speech.

So these invocations of free speech and academic freedoms are merely a smokescreen to cover the hypocrisy of those who claim that they are committed to open dialogue and the expression of all points of view.  That is so much hooey.  Of course, the event should go forward, but it should be sponsored by students and outside groups, not by a department of the college.  The same should be true of pro-Israel events.

The very same professors who demand the right to advocate BDS against Israel would demand the right to suppress the free speech and academic freedom of those who support Israeli settlements and the denial of statehood to the Palestinians.  ”Free speech for me but not for thee” has always been the hallmark of extremists on both the left and right.  These extremists believe they know the Truth and that there is no reason for supporting, endorsing or even tolerating opposing viewpoints.  They cannot be trusted to grade students neutrally and without bias.  I know that if I were a student at Brooklyn College today, I would not major in political science for fear that my support for Israel and my opposition to BDS might prejudice me in the eyes of professors whose department has officially endorsed BDS, thus discriminating against my point of view in the marketplace of ideas.  How could I be sure they wouldn’t discriminate against my point of view in grading or recommending students?  This is the real issue in the hullabaloo over the decision by the Brooklyn College political science department to co-sponsor and endorse the BDS campaign at Brooklyn College.

Nor is this only a hypothetical or abstract fear.  One political science student at Brooklyn College said she was afraid to criticize her department because “that’s going to put a target on my back.”  Other students talked about a “chilling effect” that the department’s decision would have on them.  And yet another student said that she had “an uncomfortable feeling” about raising her hand and arguing “with a professor who voted for it”  and who tried to justify his vote in the classroom.

The president of Brooklyn College says she believes that departments have the right to take controversial positions and to sponsor and endorse controversial events.  Where is the line to be drawn?  Would the Brooklyn College political science department have the right offer a course entitled, “Why BDS against Israel is a good thing?”  Would the faculty have the right to grade students based on whether their exams agree or disagree with the department’s official party line on BDS?  Would the department have the right to deny the request of a faculty member to teach a course on why BDS against Israel is a bad thing?  Surely the answer to these questions is no and even the chairman of the political science department at Brooklyn College would probably agree.  But his department has endorsed BDS against Israel, and it would not co-sponsor or endorse an equivalent speech on the other side of the issue:  namely, by a radical, pro-settlement, anti-Palestinian statehood, zealot.  I doubt his department would co-sponsor and endorse a speech by a moderate pro-Israel advocate who favored the two state solution and opposed settlement building.  That issue is being tested because Brooklyn College Hillel is asking the political science department to “co-sponsor” and “endorse” an anti-BDS talk by me.  The shoe is now on the other foot!  And it is causing painful blisters.

There are only two reasonable approaches to what departments should be entitled to do:  either they should sponsor and endorse events on all sides of controversial issues, or they should get out of the business of selectively sponsoring and endorsing only one side of such issues.  The approach taken by the political science department at Brooklyn College is absolutely unacceptable:  namely, to endorse and sponsor only one side of a controversial issue while refusing to co-sponsor and endorse the other side of the issue.  The president of Brooklyn College is wrong when she says that departments should have the right to selectively sponsor and endorse only one side of a controversy.   That is a long step on the road to turning academic departments into biased, partisan and one-sided propaganda centers, reminiscent of “political science” departments in the former Soviet Union that “encouraged” their students to follow the official party line.

2 Comments

  • Sometimes there are not two sides to a issue…Please describe the “other” side of Auschwitz or Treblinka…BDS is the same…It is the “other” side of Auschwitz or Treblinka…For rational humane people there is no “other” side…but for sociopaths and antisemites there is an “other” side…
    VOILA BDS!

  • gino sinopoli

    we ALL will reap what we have sown; goodness for goodness / evil for evil / open or closed intentions and without the True Light to feed its growth will be revealed.

Leave a Reply

Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition.


Current day month ye@r *

More...

  • Arts and Culture Middle East Hamas Commander Reportedly Urges Hezbollah to Join Forces Against Israel

    Hamas Commander Reportedly Urges Hezbollah to Join Forces Against Israel

    JNS.org – Five months after Israeli forces tried to assassinate Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif in Gaza, Deif appears to have signed a letter that the terrorist group claims he wrote in hiding. The letter, addressed to Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, expressed Deif’s condolences for the death of Hezbollah terrorists during Sunday’s reported Israeli airstrike in Syria. Deif is said to have survived multiple assassination attempts, but he has not been seen in public for years. According to the Hezbollah-linked Al-Manar [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Theater Shlomo Carlebach Musical Has the Soul to Heal Frayed Race Relations

    Shlomo Carlebach Musical Has the Soul to Heal Frayed Race Relations

    JNS.org – The cracks that had been simply painted over for so long began to show in Ferguson, Mo., in November 2014, but in truth they had begun to open wide much earlier—on Saturday, July 13, 2013. That is when a jury in Sanford, Fla., acquitted George Zimmerman of culpability for the death of a 17-year-old black man, Trayvon Martin. The cracks receded from view over time, as other news obscured them. Then came the evening of Aug. 9, 2014, [...]

    Read more →
  • Theater US & Canada ‘Homeland’ Season Finale Stirs Controversy After Comparing Menachem Begin to Taliban Leader

    ‘Homeland’ Season Finale Stirs Controversy After Comparing Menachem Begin to Taliban Leader

    A controversial scene in the season finale of Homeland sparked outrage by comparing former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to a fictional Taliban leader, the UK’s Daily Mail reported. In the season 4 finale episode, which aired on Dec. 21, CIA black ops director Dar Adal, played by F. Murray Abraham, justifies a deal he made with a Taliban leader by referencing Begin. He makes the remarks in a conversation with former CIA director Saul Berenson, a Jewish character played by Mandy [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Spirituality/Tradition Placing Matisyahu Back Within a Life of Observance

    Placing Matisyahu Back Within a Life of Observance

    Shining Light on Fiction During the North Korea-Sony saga, we learned two important lessons. The first is that there are two sides to this story, and neither of them are correct because ultimately we should have neither inappropriate movies nor dictators. The second is that we cannot remain entirely fixed on the religious world, but we also must see beyond the external, secular view of reality. It’s important to ground our Torah-based thoughts into real-life activism. To view our act [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs Nine Decades of Moses at the Movies

    Nine Decades of Moses at the Movies

    JNS.org – Hollywood has had its share of big-budget biblical flops, but until now, the Exodus narrative has not been among them. Studios have brought Moses to the big screen sparingly, but in ways that defined the image and character of Moses for each generation of audiences. The first biblical epic In 1923, director Cecil B. DeMille left it to the American public to decide the subject of his next movie for Paramount. DeMille received a letter from a mechanic [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs Exodus on Screen (REVIEW)

    Exodus on Screen (REVIEW)

    JNS.org – The story of the Exodus from Egypt is a tale as old as time itself, to borrow a turn of phrase. It’s retold every Passover, both at the seder table and whenever “The Ten Commandments” is aired on television. But the latest adaptation—Ridley Scott’s epic film, “Exodus: Gods and Kings”—fails to meet expectations. Scott’s “Exodus” alters the source material to service the story and ground the tale, but the attempt to reinvent the biblical narrative becomes laughable. Moses [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Lifestyle ‘Jewish Food Movement’ Comes of Age

    ‘Jewish Food Movement’ Comes of Age

    JNS.org - In December 2007, leaders of the Hazon nonprofit drafted seven-year goals for what they coined as the “Jewish Food Movement,” which has since been characterized by the increased prioritization of healthy eating, sustainable agriculture, and food-related activism in the Jewish community. What do the next seven years hold in store? “One thing I would like to see happen in the next seven years is [regarding] the issue of sugar, soda, and obesity, [seeing] what would it be like to rally the [...]

    Read more →
  • Blogs Education Seeds of ‘Start-Up Nation’ Cultivated by Israel Sci-Tech Schools

    Seeds of ‘Start-Up Nation’ Cultivated by Israel Sci-Tech Schools

    JNS.org – Forget the dioramas. How about working on an Israeli Air Force drone? That’s exactly the kind of beyond-their-years access enjoyed by students at the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) industrial vocational high school run by Israel Sci-Tech Schools, the largest education network in the Jewish state. More than 300 students (250 on the high school level and 68 at a two-year vocational academy) get hands-on training in the disciplines of aviation mechanics, electricity and energy control, and unmanned air [...]

    Read more →



Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.