Chuck Hagel: Mediocre Boilerplate

February 4, 2013 2:15 am 1 comment

Former U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel. Photo: Wikipedia.

For all the thunder about the “missing” J Street speech Chuck Hagel gave in 2009, watching it was almost a letdown.

There is simply no “smoking-gun” anti-Semitism or anti-Israelism there, aside from a single reference to some policies working to the “single issue benefit of certain groups.”  OK, yes, that’s a reference to Jews, and no, it isn’t nice.  But generally speaking, Hagel gave a truly boilerplate, mediocre speech that starts in the wrong place, makes factual errors, and then draws the wrong conclusions.

Sen. Hagel begins by explicitly calling the Palestinian-Israeli or Arab-Israel conflict (he incorrectly equates the two) the foundation of anti-Western Arab attitudes and the wellspring of Islamic jihad.  He starts the conflict in 1967.  Arab opposition to Jewish communal life in any part of Ottoman Palestine expressed itself in attacks on Jews long before Israel’s independence in 1948, and it continued after with the Arab rejection of the State of Israel, even as Jordan and Egypt illegally occupied the West Bank and Gaza from 1949-67.  To ignore this erases the responsibility of the Arab States for a) their continuing intransigence on the subject of Israeli sovereignty and b) their failure to establish a Palestinian Arab state in 1948.  The Arab States don’t mind.

What Words Mean

Turning to Palestinians and Israelis, Sen. Hagel says, “Both sides know what the issues are” and that those issues have been “holding us hostage since 1967.”  The issues, according to Hagel, are borders, refugees, and Jerusalem, which is like saying “War and Peace” is about war and peace.

For a single example of the pitfalls of broad generalizations, consider “refugees.”  Israel and the United States agree that hundreds of thousands of Jews evicted from Arab countries after 1948 constitute a refugee group entitled to compensation.  The Arab States do not agree, because it would make them culpable.  (See 1948, above.)

The Palestinians define refugees inter-generationally — a position unique in refugee relief circles.  It is the formal Palestinian position that the original 1947/48 refugees and their descendants have a right to live within the 1948 borders of Israel, even if they choose to accept compensation or settlement elsewhere; that’s why they call it the “right of return.”  Palestinian officials are on record asserting that even the establishment of an independent Palestinian State will not make Palestinian citizens out of refugees who should be “returned” to Israel.  The United States and Israel do not agree.

There are similar issues regarding Palestinian use and Israeli use of the words “borders” and “Jerusalem.”  Even if you really do know “what the issues are,” you might discover that they are not resolvable.

Smaller Problems and Bigger Ones

Sen. Hagel ascribes the inability of Palestinians and Israelis to achieve “peace” to leaders “in Ramallah, in Tel Aviv, in Riyadh, and in Cairo” unwilling to undertake the “difficult and harsh responsibilities of leadership.”  The smaller problem is his placement of the Israeli Prime Minister in Tel Aviv.  The bigger one is conflating Arab dictatorships with Israel’s democratic leadership, which is subject not only to elections, but also to a free press and independent judiciary.  By the time of Hagel’s speech, PA leader Mahmoud Abbas had already finished his elected term and to this day has not faced voters again.

Trying to be practical, Sen. Hagel suggested discussing “security guarantees for Israel” at the “front end” of the process, presumably to give Israel confidence that its withdrawal from strategic territory would not increase its risk.  He proposed foreign forces to replace the IDF, something Israel has generally rejected.  That is the smaller problem.

The bigger one is his apparent willingness to use American troops.

The biggest is that his model for West Bank peacekeeping is the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) in the Sinai.  The correct model would be the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) because the problems will be the same ones UNIFIL faces.

The mission of the MFO is to monitor compliance with Sinai demilitarization.  Egypt withdrew its forces to an agreed-upon line, and there were few civilians living near the border (this has changed over the decades with a corresponding increase in smuggling and terrorist activity).  On the Israeli side, the Negev is not densely populated and is far from the major cities.

In any West Bank arrangement, the populations will be physically close, and tens of thousands of Palestinians work in Israel every day.  After Israel withdrew behind the U.N.-approved international border with Lebanon, Hezb’allah moved right up to the border with its missiles.  UNIFIL soldiers live in Lebanon among the villagers, and Hezb’allah lives among them as well.  UNIFIL, then, is hostage to Hezb’allah.  In three meetings with UNIFIL representatives in which I participated, the ability to live unmolested was of understandably great importance to the international forces, which have not discovered a single Hezb’allah breach of the U.N. ceasefire since 2006.

These, though, are problems for Israel and its neighbors to solve, or not.

America’s Problem in the Region

During the Q&A, the moderator said to Sen. Hagel, “So Iran is connected to Afghanistan, and Afghanistan is connected to Israel and Palestine, and connected to Syria.”  Hagel replied, “It’s all connected.”

But not to Israel.  If it were, one might almost understand Hagel’s and J Street’s determination to sacrifice Israel on the altar of “world peace” or a tolerant Islam or the end of Islamist jihad against the West and the end of terrorism as a decent trade-off — like tossing virgins into the volcano.

If Sen. Hagel wants to be an effective secretary of defense in a successful administration, he and they have to grapple with what Secretary Clinton finally called the “global jihad.”  That, not America’s failure to “solve” the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, is the core of America’s problem with radical Islamists.

There is a stream of radical, anti-Western Islam that has taken hold across the Middle East and now North Africa: the Sunni version come from the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda, and the Shiite version from Iran.  They don’t like Israel.  They also don’t like the United States or Europe; they don’t like modernity, women, gays, education, science, capitalism, free markets, or tolerance.  If Israel disappeared, all the other things they hate would remain, and they themselves would remain, and they would be our problem still.  Israel isn’t the problem; it is an ally in the fight.

Sen. Hagel didn’t understand that in 2009.  But that was when Mubarak was still in power and 60,000 now-dead Syrians were still alive.  Before Tunisia, Libya, Mali, Nigeria, and Algeria.  The question for the Senate is, “Does he understand it now?”

This article by Shoshana Bryen was originally published by American Thinker.

1 Comment

  • Lawrence Kulak

    This guy Hagel is apparently great for all these columnists to wax eloquently, one more brilliant than the other. But the phrase “mediocre boilerplate” still doesn’t do justice to the truth which is plain and simple that this is a case of “The emperor’s new clothes” but nobody wants to admit it because then perhaps there would be nothing left to write about.

    Hagel looks like a cheap Saturday Night Live Parody of a drunkard at best with his baggy eyes, droopy face and slurred speech. Hagel has an anachronistic approach to the Middle East problem for the simple reason is that it is simple and anti-Israel in its basic approach. Crude anti-semites like Hagel well understand one thing, and that is that the more you complicate the issue and entangle Israel with the Arabs the more jeopardy you place upon the Jewish State. This is why Hagel, though obviously no scholar, complicates all the issues having to do with the Middle East – from arguing against the Iraq War Surge, to supporting negotiations with the likes of Hamas and Iran.

    It all boils down to one truth alone which it seems like Senators like Lyndsay Graham understand well but Schmucky chuckys (Schumer) with perfect SAT scores do not for some reason: That is, that Hagel’s entire political raison d’etre may be to harm Israel.

Leave a Reply

Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition.


Current day month ye@r *

More...

  • Arts and Culture Theater US & Canada New Play Explores the ‘Arrogance’ of American Jews Critical of Israel, Playwright Says

    New Play Explores the ‘Arrogance’ of American Jews Critical of Israel, Playwright Says

    In his new play Mr. Goldberg Goes to Tel Aviv, playwright Oren Safdie tackles an issue that he has a major concern with: the relationship between Israelis and left-leaning Diaspora Jews with their “I know better” critical views. At the heart of the one-act play is Tony, a Jewish and gay Palestinian sympathizer who expresses strong anti-Israel sentiments when the play begins and at one point even sides with a Palestinian terrorist who holds his captive. Tony, who is also an [...]

    Read more →
  • Music US & Canada Hassidic Parody of Taylor Swift Song Apes Long Jewish Holidays (VIDEO)

    Hassidic Parody of Taylor Swift Song Apes Long Jewish Holidays (VIDEO)

    A Jewish comedy troupe released a parody video on Wednesday of Taylor Swift’s hit song Shake It Off in which they joke about taking extensive time off from work for Jewish holidays. “And the goyim gonna stay, stay, stay, stay, stay. And the Jews are gonna pray, pray pray, pray, pray. I’m just gonna take, take, take, take, take. I’m taking off,” goes the chorus for I’m Taking Off. Menachem Weinstein, the video’s lead singer, is the creative director at [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Jewish Literature On 75th Anniversary, Looking at the Jewish Influence on Gone With the Wind

    On 75th Anniversary, Looking at the Jewish Influence on Gone With the Wind

    JNS.org – The 75th anniversary of the premiere of “Gone with the Wind” on Dec. 15 presents an opportunity to examine the Jewish influence on one of the most popular films of all time. That influence starts with the American Civil War epic’s famed producer, David O. Selznick. Adjusted for inflation, “Gone with the Wind” remains the highest-grossing movie ever made. It earned the 1939 Academy Award for Best Picture, the same honor another Selznick film, “Rebecca,” garnered in 1940. Selznick [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Music US & Canada EXCLUSIVE: Matisyahu Provides Most Extensive Analysis Yet of His Religious, Musical Evolution (INTERVIEW)

    EXCLUSIVE: Matisyahu Provides Most Extensive Analysis Yet of His Religious, Musical Evolution (INTERVIEW)

    Matisyahu got candid in an exclusive interview with The Algemeiner on Monday about his religious and musical journey – after shedding his Chassidic skin, yarmulke, long beard and all – from the start of his career in 2005 when he became a reggae superstar with hits King Without a Crown and Jerusalem. The singer-songwriter embarks on his Festival of Light tour this month, an annual Hanukkah event that stops in Montreal, New York, and other cities before ending in San Juan, [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Personalities ‘Sheriff of Mars’ Unveils Endearing Life of Jewish Music Star Hidden in the Fields of France

    ‘Sheriff of Mars’ Unveils Endearing Life of Jewish Music Star Hidden in the Fields of France

    JNS.org – It was an era of steel strings, guitar heroes, and storytellers—high on heroin, rebellious. Outlaw country music, the hallmark of Nashville’s powerful and angry music scene of the 1970s, was the brew of greats such as Johnny Cash, Willie Nelson, and Townes Van Zandt. But there is another, little-known music hero of that era: Daniel Antopolsky. A Jewish lad from Augusta, Ga.—the son of immigrants who settled in the south and ran a hardware store on Main Street—the [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture US & Canada Iranian Actress Replaces Israel’s Gal Gadot for ‘Ben-Hur’ Remake

    Iranian Actress Replaces Israel’s Gal Gadot for ‘Ben-Hur’ Remake

    Iranian actress Nazanin Boniadi replaced Israeli star Gal Gadot as the female lead in the new Ben-Hur remake, Hollywood.com reported on Tuesday. The Homeland actress will play Esther, a slave that Ben-Hur sets free and falls in love with. Gadot quit the movie when it became clear that filming conflicted with her schedule for the Man of Steel sequel. The Israeli actress plays Wonder Woman in the superhero film Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. Actor Jack Huston takes on the [...]

    Read more →
  • Book Reviews Personalities Biography Sheds New Light on David Ben-Gurion’s Place in Jewish History

    Biography Sheds New Light on David Ben-Gurion’s Place in Jewish History

    JNS.org – There is one sentence in “Ben-Gurion: Father of Modern Israel” that made me sit up in surprise. I thought that I knew the basic facts about how Israel came into being, but while describing what it was like in the days and hours before the state was declared, author Anita Shapira provides one important anecdote I was not aware of. On the 12th of May, the Zionist Executive met to decide what to do. Moshe Sharrett had just returned [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture US & Canada ‘Death of Klinghoffer’ Actress Compares Met Opera to ‘Schindler’s List’

    ‘Death of Klinghoffer’ Actress Compares Met Opera to ‘Schindler’s List’

    An actress starring in the controversial Met Opera The Death of Klinghoffer defended the show on Tuesday by comparing it to the 1993 Holocaust film Schindler’s List, New York Post reported. “To me, this was like [the movie] Schindler’s List. We make art so people won’t forget,’’ said the actress, who plays a captured passenger in the show and asked not to be identified. The Met Opera focuses on the infamous murder of Lower East Side Jewish resident Leon Klinghoffer, 69. The wheelchair-bound father of [...]

    Read more →



Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.