Choose Your Side: The New York Times or Judaism

March 18, 2013 2:12 am 10 comments

New York Times building in New York. Photo: Haxorjoe.

“How long halt ye between two opinions?” - 1 Kings 18:21

American Jewry is often said to be divided between those who judge Judaism by the principles of the New York Times and those who judge the New York Times by the principles of Judaism. The former group was elated by Professor Joseph Levine’s recent clarion call “Questioning the Jewish State” (NY Times of March 9), which advocated the expulsion of Israel from the family of nations. The latter group was dismayed and nauseated, and confirmed in its view that expecting ordinary decency from “progressive” Jewish professors is like trying to warm yourself by the light of the moon. The former, composed in large part of what Gershom Scholem called “clever Jews” who fear nothing in this world (and maybe the next as well) so much as being called “reactionary,” agreed with Levine’s insistence that he not be labelled antisemitic just because he singled out Israel, among all the nations of the world, as deserving of dissolution; the latter thought the real question is whether Levine should be called a moral nonentity because he has made himself an accessory before the fact to the genocide dreamt of (and already inspiring murderous action) by  Ahmadinejad,  Hizbullah,  Erdogan, Hamas, and numerous other “Islamist” eschatologists. (I’ve heard some ill-tempered members of this second group say that they looked forward to a Times discussion of whether Levine himself has an inalienable “right to exist.”)

Those Jews who judge the New York Times by the standards of Judaism believe that the creation of the state of Israel was one of the few redeeming events in a century of blood and shame, one of the greatest affirmations of the will to live ever made by a martyred people, and the most hopeful sign for humanity since the dove returned with the olive branch to Noah. They tend also to cling to Orwell’s view that some ideas–like the virtue of Jewish powerlessness–are so stupid that only intellectuals can believe them.

Those who judge Judaism by the standards of the New York Times boast of not having “danced in the streets when Ben-Gurion declared that the Jews, like other peoples, had a state of their own.” They believe (as does a majority of today’s Germans too) that Israel is the chief obstacle to world peace, a diversion from such compelling goals as gay marriage and unlimited access to abortion, and indeed the principal cause of most of the world’s evils with the (possible) exception of global warming.

Professor Levine’s polemic draws on sources both ancient and modern. It harkens back–albeit in the clumsy and verbose manner of somebody who “unpacks” rather than articulates  ideas–to the earliest known ancient, non-Jewish document that mentions Israel by name. It is found on a monument from 1215 BCE (possessed by the British Museum) in which King Merneptah, the Egyptian forerunner of Chmielnicki, Hitler, Nasser, and Ahmadinejad, declares that  “Israel is extinguished, its seed is no more.”

Levine, to be sure,  is a philosopher, and not–on the surface, at least–a political agitator and propagandist, although he identifies himself (who could have guessed?) as a man of the left.  Up to a point, Levine has some respectable predecessors among fellow-philosophers. In 1932, for example, Julien Benda, French philosopher (and novelist) addressed the “European nation” as follows: “Intellectuals of all countries, you must be the ones to tell your nations that they are always in the wrong by the single fact that they are nations…Plotinus blushed at having a body. You should blush at having a nation.” But whereas Benda called for philosophers of ALL nations to blush, Levine believes in blushing only by Jews for the Jewish nation. Although the imperfections he imputes to Israel because it calls itself “Jewish” manifest themselves–a hundred fold–in scores of  members of the United Nations, he demands the dissolution only of the Jewish nation–not the 22 Arab nations or the numerous Christian ones or the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Like all Israel dissolutionists–one-state solution advocates, no-state solution advocates, and (this from the tone-deaf George Steiner) “final solution” advocates–he insists that Israel cannot be both Jewish and democratic. Perhaps the Times will soon invite him to cast his philosophic eye over a country called the United Kingdom, widely reputed to be democratic, and yet possessed of an official Protestant church, a Protestant monarch, a Protestant educational system (and all this in a once-Catholic country).

Levine has also attached himself, not unwittingly, to what Raul Hilberg called the last version of that ever-shortening sentence which expressed Europe’s anti-Jewish policies over the centuries. “The missionaries of Christianity,” wrote Hilberg, “had said in effect: You have no right to live among us as Jews. The secular rulers who followed had proclaimed: You have no right to live among us. The German Nazis at last decreed: you have no right to live.” Levine admits to a slight uneasiness about the resemblance between his challenging Israel’s “right to exist” and the Nazis’ disputing the Jews’ “right to live.” But confidence in his own infallibility carries him quickly over this abyss, as if it were just an unfortunate coincidence of diction and phrasing. In fact, of course, it makes him complicit in what Hannah Arendt famously defined as the crime against humanity, “an attack upon human diversity as such, that is, upon a characteristic of the ‘human status’ without which the very words ‘mankind’ or ‘humanity’ would be devoid of meaning.”

Hannah Arendt’s colleague (and critic) Saul Bellow put the matter more tersely in “To Jerusalem and Back” (1976): “The subject of all this talk is, ultimately, survival–the survival of the decent society, created in Israel within a few decades….The Jews, because they are Jews, have never been able to take the right to live as a natural right.”

Edward Alexander’s most recent book is THE STATE OF THE JEWS: A Critical Appraisal (Transaction Publishers).

10 Comments

  • What would you expect from a base vile Nazi in human garb and its quasi-Nazi, but carefully camouflaged, so-called newspaper backing these unsavoury lowly characters?

  • Edward Alexander has been sweeping the floor with this kind of Jew hating Jew for years. He is without peer. He has only one fault. These people, here this Professor Joseph Levine, are cowards. I don’t mean they won’t speak their minds. They are physical cowards. They won’t take a punch or give one back. This is a coward. As Malshenim, Levine drifts toward opportunities to be more Nazi-liberal-democrat-fascist-than such because he has no fear of angering them. The reverse is the case if he must defend being a Jew. Better to hate them.

    RJL

  • Leslie Green

    Bravo, Mr. Alexander! I found Mr. Levine’s column sickening. I wonder how Mr. Levine would have felt had he been in my parent’s shoes? As teenagers who would have desperately wanted to emigrate to Palestine from Czechoslovakia in 1939, and join the hundreds of thousands of Jews already there, but could not because the British, afraid to anger the Arabs, would not allow Jews into the country. Were my parents, Aunts, Uncles Cousins and Grandparents not a people deserving of their own State then? I suspect that Mr. Levine, who sits in his Ivory tower would feel very differently. With apologies to Camille Paglia- Professors of humanities, (Mr. Levine in particular) with all their leftist fantasies, have little direct knowledge of (Jewish life, practice and history) and (should have) no impact whatever on public policy.” They certainly should not be spouting off such disturbing rhetoric in the N. Y. Times. And shame on the Times for printing such dribble.

  • Professor Levine may have a ‘doctorate’ but his knowledge is hardly a cure for the ills of the world. Anyone having earned an advance degree surely understands the importance of research and verification of information.

    Regarding the historical and legal rights of Jews to their land Levine might learn from the Canadian international attorney, Dr. Jacques Gauthier, who spent twenty-five years doing research for his doctoral thesis. His conclusion, based on history and law, verifies that Jerusalem and more belong to Jews for their homeland. (Dr. Gauthier is Christian.)

    (Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf8cF1HYqN8&feature=youtube_gdata_player)

    It might serve the professor well to delve into ancient history of the region and recognize that Jews were the only people who had a nation in the land, that despite several foreign conquests, there always remained a Jewish presence, that Jews were the original ‘Palestinians’ – so named by the Romans more than 2000 years ago and recognized as such until 1948 when they became ‘Israelis’. Even then, today’s ‘Palestinians’ did not use that designation which they adopted years later for political expediency since the name matches that of the territory.

    The professor might examine the San Remo Conference (1920) and the Mandate for Palestine (1922) , the promise of the resurrection of the Jewish homeland on its original
    site, the failure of the British in their mandate, their collaboration with the Muslims who supported Hitler, today’s hijacked anti-Israel U.N., and the growing threat of radical Islam – the enemy of Western civilization.

    Professor Levine is entitled to his views and a newspaper is entitled to print what it sees fit. Intelligent readers want accuracy based on facts; newspapers of worth live up to ethical standards of reporting rather than ‘sensational’ views based on untruths and distortions. An accurate assessment of the Middle East today would show that most of the Muslim/Arab countries are experiencing internal chaos with growing control by the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood –enemies of the West. Only tiny Israel, the lone democracy in the entire region, surrounded by enemies and threatened daily with annihilation, seems to maintain her composure. She is not perfect but certainly not an obstacle to peace -rather a model to be emulated.

    So much for the views of Professor Levine and the present reporting of the once respected New York Times.

  • This professor Levine (his name tells me he is ancestrally related to Moses) forgets that Moses forged a nation and helped them settle their promised land, and that for many many hundreds of years already they formed a nation and had a country. Now he comes and tells us that there should be no Israel. He is delusional but G’d willing, history, like the proverbial caravan is inexorably moving, and the pathetic professor Levine, like the proverbial rabid dogs, is barking.

  • Raymond in DC

    “he demands the dissolution only of the Jewish nation–not the twenty-two Muslim ones, and not the still greater number of Christian ones.”

    Actually, there are twenty-two *Arab* states, and *56* Muslim states in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Add one more if “Palestine” becomes a state, and under its proposed Constitution it declares itself Arab and Muslim. But a single Jewish state is deemed unacceptable?

  • Thank you, Mr. Alexander. Alas, the ‘Erev Rav’, faux Jews, have been among the Jewish people since the Exodus, weakening, dividing us, and separating us from our G-d every chance they get. And most of them worship the NYTimes.

  • richard sherman

    The New York Times demonstrated its foundational antisemitism in WW2 when it did its best to bury the Holocaust. Nothing has changed.

Leave a Reply

Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition.


Current day month ye@r *

More...

  • Arts and Culture Middle East Hamas Commander Reportedly Urges Hezbollah to Join Forces Against Israel

    Hamas Commander Reportedly Urges Hezbollah to Join Forces Against Israel

    JNS.org – Five months after Israeli forces tried to assassinate Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif in Gaza, Deif appears to have signed a letter that the terrorist group claims he wrote in hiding. The letter, addressed to Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, expressed Deif’s condolences for the death of Hezbollah terrorists during Sunday’s reported Israeli airstrike in Syria. Deif is said to have survived multiple assassination attempts, but he has not been seen in public for years. According to the Hezbollah-linked Al-Manar [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Theater Shlomo Carlebach Musical Has the Soul to Heal Frayed Race Relations

    Shlomo Carlebach Musical Has the Soul to Heal Frayed Race Relations

    JNS.org – The cracks that had been simply painted over for so long began to show in Ferguson, Mo., in November 2014, but in truth they had begun to open wide much earlier—on Saturday, July 13, 2013. That is when a jury in Sanford, Fla., acquitted George Zimmerman of culpability for the death of a 17-year-old black man, Trayvon Martin. The cracks receded from view over time, as other news obscured them. Then came the evening of Aug. 9, 2014, [...]

    Read more →
  • Theater US & Canada ‘Homeland’ Season Finale Stirs Controversy After Comparing Menachem Begin to Taliban Leader

    ‘Homeland’ Season Finale Stirs Controversy After Comparing Menachem Begin to Taliban Leader

    A controversial scene in the season finale of Homeland sparked outrage by comparing former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to a fictional Taliban leader, the UK’s Daily Mail reported. In the season 4 finale episode, which aired on Dec. 21, CIA black ops director Dar Adal, played by F. Murray Abraham, justifies a deal he made with a Taliban leader by referencing Begin. He makes the remarks in a conversation with former CIA director Saul Berenson, a Jewish character played by Mandy [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Spirituality/Tradition Placing Matisyahu Back Within a Life of Observance

    Placing Matisyahu Back Within a Life of Observance

    Shining Light on Fiction During the North Korea-Sony saga, we learned two important lessons. The first is that there are two sides to this story, and neither of them are correct because ultimately we should have neither inappropriate movies nor dictators. The second is that we cannot remain entirely fixed on the religious world, but we also must see beyond the external, secular view of reality. It’s important to ground our Torah-based thoughts into real-life activism. To view our act [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs Nine Decades of Moses at the Movies

    Nine Decades of Moses at the Movies

    JNS.org – Hollywood has had its share of big-budget biblical flops, but until now, the Exodus narrative has not been among them. Studios have brought Moses to the big screen sparingly, but in ways that defined the image and character of Moses for each generation of audiences. The first biblical epic In 1923, director Cecil B. DeMille left it to the American public to decide the subject of his next movie for Paramount. DeMille received a letter from a mechanic [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs Exodus on Screen (REVIEW)

    Exodus on Screen (REVIEW)

    JNS.org – The story of the Exodus from Egypt is a tale as old as time itself, to borrow a turn of phrase. It’s retold every Passover, both at the seder table and whenever “The Ten Commandments” is aired on television. But the latest adaptation—Ridley Scott’s epic film, “Exodus: Gods and Kings”—fails to meet expectations. Scott’s “Exodus” alters the source material to service the story and ground the tale, but the attempt to reinvent the biblical narrative becomes laughable. Moses [...]

    Read more →
  • Jewish Identity Lifestyle ‘Jewish Food Movement’ Comes of Age

    ‘Jewish Food Movement’ Comes of Age

    JNS.org - In December 2007, leaders of the Hazon nonprofit drafted seven-year goals for what they coined as the “Jewish Food Movement,” which has since been characterized by the increased prioritization of healthy eating, sustainable agriculture, and food-related activism in the Jewish community. What do the next seven years hold in store? “One thing I would like to see happen in the next seven years is [regarding] the issue of sugar, soda, and obesity, [seeing] what would it be like to rally the [...]

    Read more →
  • Blogs Education Seeds of ‘Start-Up Nation’ Cultivated by Israel Sci-Tech Schools

    Seeds of ‘Start-Up Nation’ Cultivated by Israel Sci-Tech Schools

    JNS.org – Forget the dioramas. How about working on an Israeli Air Force drone? That’s exactly the kind of beyond-their-years access enjoyed by students at the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) industrial vocational high school run by Israel Sci-Tech Schools, the largest education network in the Jewish state. More than 300 students (250 on the high school level and 68 at a two-year vocational academy) get hands-on training in the disciplines of aviation mechanics, electricity and energy control, and unmanned air [...]

    Read more →



Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.