Egypt vs. Turkey: Are All Islamists Autocratic?
by Daniel Pipes
Mohamed Morsi’s recent ejection as president of Egypt prompts a contrast-and-compare with his Turkish counterpart, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Their careers at the top contain major dissimilarities:
- Morsi’s stunning economic indifference vs. Erdoğan’s very impressive economic management.
- Imposing Islamic ways too fast and broadly in on year vs. applying them slowly and piecemeal in a decade.
- Inspiring the largest political protest in human history vs. winning three elections with successively larger percentages of the vote.
- Antagonizing the deep state vs. patiently sidelining it.
- Being removed from office by the military vs. removing the military from politics.
I am inclined to see it as inherent … except that some Islamists in Turkey, host of the world’s most sophisticated Islamist scene, appear to becoming less autocratic. The president, Abdullah Gül, and the leader of the chief Turkish Islamist organization, Fethullah Gülen, are apparently evolving away from the dictatorial mentality. Gül’s caution and democratic sensibility in response to the Gezi Park protests could lead to his becoming Erdoğan’s successor. How Gül and Gülen respond to an increasingly erratic Erdoğan has probably major implications for the future of the Islamist movement. Keep an eye on those two.
This article was originally published by National Review Online.