Deal With Iran is a Betrayal of Epic Proportions
The United States has led world powers into an agreement with Iran that officially allows Iran to enrich uranium. The consequences of this deal will necessarily be earth-shattering, and not in a good way.
Some points to ponder:
1. Why does the oil rich nation of Iran need to enrich uranium?
2. Who has a greater knowledge and appreciation of Israel’s security situation and existential threats to it, the United States or Israel?
3. Why have Iranian leaders repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel from the map? In other words, the two nations do not even share a border, why does the Iranian regime harbor such animosity against Israel? What has Israel ever done to Iran?
4. What would motivate anyone to entrust a nuclear capability to the single largest state sponsor of terror in the world? In other words, who would possibly believe the Iranian protestations that uranium enrichment is for peaceful purposes?
5. Who could imagine that Iran’s numerous regional enemies, such as Saudi Arabia, will not now be forced into their own pursuits of a nuclear capability to protect themselves? In other words, the world powers have forced an arms race in the most volatile region in the world, a veritable tinder box of radicalism and instability.
6. If the sanctions were working – like all parties claim other than the Iranians themselves – why not double down and strangle the Iranian regime until they completely give up any pursuit of a nuclear capability? What is there to lose by doing everything humanly possible to peacefully try and destroy the Iranian nuclear project in its entirety?
Let us now try to answer each question:
1. The oil rich nation of Iran does not need to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. However, if it wishes to strike a deadly blow against the United States, Israel, or Saudi Arabia, they need to enrich uranium. To be fair, perhaps they want a nuclear bomb ‘only’ as a deterrent, so they can continue, and ramp up, their terrorist activities around the world. And now the world powers will fear striking Iran, much as the world is afraid of striking North Korea because of its nuclear weapons.
2. Israel has a greater knowledge of its own security situation than the U.S. It is arrogance for the U.S. and other world powers to dictate to Israel what is in its best interests. As opposed to Iran, Israel is a liberal democracy, and its leaders are elected freely by a peace-loving, law-abiding population. Israel’s interests clearly differ greatly from those of the U.S.
3. The Iranian Mullahs hate Israel and the Jewish people, as they hate many Christians, secular nations, and non Shiite Muslims. There is no valid, rational reason for the implacable hatred on constant display by the Iranian regime. There is, however, a strong, extremist religious reason for this hatred. A worldview that welcomes the advent of the apocalypse is not one that can be rationally dealt with. To be clear, Israel has never done anything to Iran other than exist, and the same can be said of all Western nations and non Shiite nations (meaning essentially everyone else).
4. This is perhaps the most troubling of all questions. There are only a couple of possibilities as to why the U.S. would choose to allow a bloodthirsty, tyrannical regime a nuclear capability. At best, it would seem to be a naÃ¯veté of epic proportions. This level of naÃ¯veté rivals Neville Chamberlin when he proclaimed, “We have peace in our time,” and that of a previous administration that welcomed the Ayatollah Khomeini and his regime into power, trusting their promise of democracy. We have suffered for more than 30 years because of that blunder, with countless terror attacks and a general destabilization in the Middle East. A nuclear capable Iran is a mistake that will take at least as long to undo, unless more aggressive, non-peaceful means are employed.
At worst, it demonstrates a perverse desire to empower the Iranian Mullahs. Perhaps this desire emanates from a misplaced feeling of guilt for Western successes over the past thousand years. Perhaps it is part of a cynical ploy to further isolate Israel, forcing her into painful and dangerous concessions, or simply out of existence, G-d forbid.
5. Now that the harness has officially been lifted, there is no way that this cannot lead to an all-out arms race in the Middle East. Unfortunately, the only regime in the neighborhood that shares our western ideals of liberal democracy will be surrounded by nuclear capable, theocratic, Western-hating regimes as a direct result of this deal. Does Washington possibly think they can control all of the countries that will now be racing to acquire a nuclear capability? Are they so morally confused as to think mutually assured destruction will keep us safe?
6. So why did this administration give up on the sanctions that were taking a bite out of Iran’s nuclear aspirations? Perhaps the best answer is, “All of the above.” There is no logical explanation that we have been made aware of for the capitulation of the 21st century. I shudder to think of the reasons we have not been made aware of.
Do we trust the President with his assurance that, “I have Israel’s back?” I have just one question: “How can we?!”