Jewish Organizations, Political Pundits Object to ASA Decision to Endorse Boycott of Israeli Academics

December 18, 2013 5:26 pm 16 comments
American Studies Association.

American Studies Association.

Jewish organizations and political pundits on Wednesday objected to the American Studies Association’s vote on Monday to endorse a boycott of Israeli academic institutions, with arguments that the move is anti-Semitic, as it covers for Jew hatred,  intellectually dishonest, by singling out Israel in a world of human rights abusers, and potentially illegal, because it forces a 501 (c)(3) non-profit to make a political statement.

On Monday, the ASA said 66.05% voted in favor of the motion, 30.5% voted against and 3.43% abstained. While the ASA said the vote signified the largest turnout in its association history, at only about 25% of its 5,000 members, it meant that only 16% of its membership actually voted in favor of the resolution.

In a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times, Michael Salberg, the Anti-Defamation League’s Director for International Affairs, wrote that the ASA vote was “based on a one-dimensional and biased perspective on Israel and the conflict” and quoted former Harvard University President Larry Summers who addressed the same issue a decade ago:

“Lawrence H. Summers, when president of Harvard, said it best when he was faced with a similar effort to wage an academic boycott against the Jewish state more than a decade ago: ‘Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent.’ More recently with regard to the American Studies Association, Mr. Summers rightly questioned whether university funds should be used to finance faculty membership in an association that is being used not as a scholarly association but as a political tool.”

“The group’s resolution blacklisting Israeli universities damages the cause of academic freedom, unfairly demonizes Israel, and certainly does nothing to advance the cause of a lasting Palestinian-Israeli peace.”

In a separate statement, ADL National Director Abraham Foxman, said:

“This shameful, morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest attack on academic freedom by the American Studies Association should be soundly condemned by all who are committed to the ideal that open exchange of ideas is the most effective way to achieve change. Targeting Israeli institutions solely because they are in Israel — the only democratic country in the Middle East where scholarship and debate are encouraged and flourish – is based on a myopic and fundamentally distorted perspective of Israel and the conflict and is manifestly unjust.”
“We call on academic institutions across the United States to enhance their existing relationships with Israeli universities and research institutions and stand resolutely in support of open exchange, dialogue and study.”

Kenneth Stern, the American Jewish Committee’s Director on Anti-Semitism and Extremism, said:

“This abhorrent action is blatant discrimination against Israelis. Why are Israeli academic institutions the only universities in the world to be shunned? Well, as ASA President Curtis Marez said, ‘one has to start somewhere.’”

“Frankly, Mr. Marez’s observation is shameful. Academic freedom is based on the principle that human civilization benefits from the free flow of ideas and knowledge. This resolution – ghettoizing knowledge simply because it is tied to Israeli academic institutions – violates the core principles of the academy.”

On Monday, Ronald S. Lauder, President of the World Jewish Congress, said, “This vote to boycott Israel, one of the most democratic and academically free nations on the globe, shows the Orwellian anti-Semitism and moral bankruptcy of the American Studies Association.”

“The Middle East is literally filled with dead from governments’ reaction to the convulsions of the ‘Arab Spring,’ but the American Studies Association singles out the Jewish State, the one Middle Eastern country that shares American values, for opprobrium? No wonder many Americans dismiss the academy as deeply biased and disconnected with reality.”

“The ASA should follow the example of the American Association of University Professors, which notes that any such boycott ‘undermines exactly the freedoms one wants to defend, and it takes aim at the wrong target.”

In The New RepublicLeon Wieseltier wrote:

“In a supporting document called ‘Answering Questions About the ASA Boycott from Department Chairs, Deans, Administrators,’ the ASA instructs its members that its mission is to ‘make a positive contribution to human understanding’ and ‘support diversity and equity’ and ‘contribute to solving world problems’ (there is no mention of scholarship, of course: these people long ago obliterated the distinction between academia and activism), but in truth only one ‘world problem,’ only one problem of ‘human understanding,’ exercises it, and it is the problem of the Palestinians.”

“They and they alone are the universal touchstone of decency. A few hours away from Palestine six million people are refugees in their own country, where they are being bombed by their government, and starving in the snow, and fighting polio; but never mind them, they are not Israel’s victims, and it is the turpitude of the Jewish state, not the actually existing misery in the region and the world, that offends the ASA. Compared with Aleppo, Ramallah is San Diego. But one has to start somewhere.”

In The American InterestWalter Russell Mead wrote:

“The ASA is hardly an organization whose pronouncements shake the earth, and its boycott resolution probably won’t join the Balfour Declaration and PLO Charter in the Arab-Israeli conflict’s pantheon of defining documents. But because it typifies a certain type of empty intellectual posturing on a complicated issue and because both supporters and opponents of the BDS movement engage in some over-the-top rhetoric about resolutions of this type, it is worth thinking about the support base for the kind of anti-Israel resolution that so many academics longing to feel cutting-edge about something seem to be drawn toward.”

“Other than the anti-Semitism it’s all very understandable, but a professional body that lets itself be dominated by these kinds of concerns doesn’t do itself much good. Sometimes the critics of these sanctions efforts go too far themselves, and dismiss the whole complicated mess as a simple episode of anti-Semitism run amuck. What’s happening is much more complicated, but the more I look at the half-baked anti-Israel resolutions the trendy left keeps proposing, the more confident I am that academic country boycotts and campus speech restrictions are two excellent examples of things this world can do without.”

In Time, Rabbi David Wolpe, of Los Angeles’s Temple Sinai wrote:

“It may not be immediately obvious to you that an Israeli professor who specializes in Faulkner is a threat to international stability, but you are sadly deceived. Because as the ‘FAQ’ sheet of the ASA helpfully informs us, the universities themselves are part of ‘the ideological and institutional scaffolding of the Zionist settler colonial project.’ If you thought such fusty pseudo-Marxism crumbled with the Berlin wall, welcome to the modern professorate, guardians of the good and moral scold of the only western style democracy the Middle East has to show.”

“The cost of this self-righteousness carries with it the stench of Anti-Semitism. On our troubled globe, where states do truly terrible things to their people, gassing them, slaughtering them en masse, impoverishing and immiserating them, I am aware of only one country whose continued existence has been called into question. Should Zimbabwe exist? Or Sudan? Or Syria? Only Israel is subjected to constant questioning of its right to remain a nation. Israel, a sliver of a country surrounded by tyrannical regimes or perpetually unstable governments, free for the moment from war because of strength and not because of neighborly goodwill, this Israel is the target of the opprobrium of preening academics the world over. The question is not whether members of the ASA are  anti-Semites, as individuals. All this is not because the world’s only Jewish state is uniquely evil. It is just uniquely Jewish.”

Meanwhile, the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association on Wednesday said it had also declared its support for a boycott in a statement entitled, Declaration of Support for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions:

“As the elected council of an international community of Indigenous and allied non-Indigenous scholars, students, and public intellectuals who have studied and resisted the colonization and domination of Indigenous lands via settler state structures throughout the world, we strongly protest the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and the legal structures of the Israeli state that systematically discriminate against Palestinians and other Indigenous peoples.”

The Forward wrote that the next battle ground on the debate would be at the annual conference of the 30,000-member Modern Language Association, which meets in Chicago for its annual conference, starting on January 9. Meanwhile, Peter Beinart, in The Daily Beast, asked why the ASA went beyond even what Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas had advocated last week, what Beinart also supports, a limited boycott of Israeli products from Judea and Samaria, rather than from the whole country.

Legal experts also objected to the ASA vote. Lawyers said move may open the group to a legal challenge, as the vote may have abrogated the ASA’s U.S. 501(c)(3) tax exemption charter, which does not allow non-profits to take political positions. As The Algemeiner reported on Monday, , Clinical Professor of Law and Director of the Securities Law Clinic at Cornell Law School, and the author of the LegalInsurrection.com blog said he, with the help of tax lawyer expert Alan P. Dye, Esq., Partner at Webster, Chamberlain & Bean, LLP, would challenge the ASA’s status because of the vote.

On Wednesday, David Abrams, a New York City-based lawyer placed an ad on the popular pro-Israel Elder of Ziyon blog, seeking out ASA members who objected to the vote and wanted to join a class action suit to challenge the move.

In an interview with The Algemeiner, Abrams said, “My idea is that there is a doctrine called ‘ultra vires’ which says that a corporation may not exceed the bounds of its organizational charter.”

Abrams said he felt moved to take on the case because “I am a proud supporter of Israel.”

16 Comments

  • Since the ASA is engaged in political activity, should they lose their tax exempt status ?

    Section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from supporting political candidates, and are subject to limits on lobbying. They risk loss of tax exempt status if these rules are violated. An organization that loses its 501(c)(3) status due to being engaged in political activities cannot then qualify for 501(c)(4) status.

  • Most of academia’s dislike of Israel is largely American self hatred. Many American leftist intellectuals feel guilty about the success of Western civilization over the past 500 years. So they are prone to condemn any society that shares or reflects Western values.

  • Israel and Egypt have gotten American military support since they signed a peace treaty. Do you seriously think that America should cease supporting an ally because of a Palestinian request that’s not supported by its leadership?

    Did you know that Palestine is the name that the Romans gave to Israel? That Jews have been in Israel/Palestine for 4,000 years? That Palestinians actually referred to both Arabs and Jews and that the Jews only changed their name from Palestinian to Israeli in 1948? That the Arabs have been in Palestine at least 2,000 fewer years than the Jews? That the Arabs went to war and lost their land in 1948 to Jordan, Egypt and Israel. That the Arabs are getting a 2nd chance at a homeland only because the Jews are offering them land that Israel won from Egypt and Jordan? That the Arab Palestinians have turned down all offers Israel has made because thanks to people’s ignorance, they think they can get all of Israel?

    And Dershowitz is a Democrat who supports Obama.

  • this article shows a true sickness. I am baffled at people’s quickness to jump at Israel for not having intellectual openness. quiet confusing. Israel believes in freedom of speech.

  • What do expect from academe, it’s loaded with a pack of leftists, bigots and affirmative action basket cases.

  • A S A = Anti-semitic Association

  • Israel give up your lies about Iran. The US citizens will not fall for another lie. Israel has drained the US of our money…$3.5billion plus every year while our people are hungry, homeless and jobless. Iran has the right to enrich a certain amount of uranium…not enough for a bomb..only the right wing “pundits” and Jewish organizations continue their lies…Professor Richard Falk and many other jewish people are not with you…you Zionists are on your own.

  • The ASA HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT ITS MEMBERS HAVE THE IDENTICAL ANTISEMITIC VIEWS AS HAMAS AND HEZZBOLLAH. THEY OBVIOUSLY REVERE THE SOCIOPATH MUHAMMAD WHO PERSONALLY DECAPITATED 900 UNARMED JEWS.

  • Dec. 17, 2013

    Associate Professor Curtis Marez
    Ethnic Studies Department
    University of California San Diego

    Dear Professor Marez,

    While I am not an alumnus of UC San Diego, I do live nearby in Rancho Mirage and have a deep interest in what our California institutions are teaching our children. I don’t know whether your activities as president of the ASA spills over to the classroom, but it seems likely to me that as president of the ASA, it’s only logical to assume that the organization’s preoccupation with punishing Israel is reflected in your lectures.

    You have been quoted as saying that the ASA’s boycott was imposed on Israel to express solidarity with [Palestinian] scholars and students deprived of their academic freedom. What a strange formulation. The founder of the BDS movement, Omar Barghouti who probably talked to the ASA about boycotting Israel, and who has created a worldwide boycott Israel movement is a PhD student in good standing at Tel Aviv U. Israel is doing absolutely nothing to curtail his educational freedoms, or his activities in undermining the country. Nothing more illustrates the freedom enjoyed by Israel’s Arab citizens than Israel standing back while one of its own works to delegitimize the country.

    Israeli universities are full of Arab students, many who graduate into professions that benefit themselves and all Israelis. Where is the academic deprivation amongst these students? These universities also have many Arab professors. How are they suffering academically? By the way, can you name a university in a Muslim country that has a single Jewish student? Don’t bother looking, there aren’t any.

    Perhaps the academic deprivation that concerns the ASA is at Al-Quds University which has just had its partnerships with Brandies and Syracuse universities cancelled. Al-Quds is a school for Palestinian Arabs that has partnerships with foreign universities. These partnerships were founded in part by the Ford Foundation for promoting peace and understanding. The partnerships were cancelled because Al-Quds recently held a pro-suicide bomber rally, which included demonstrators dressed in black military outfits, armed with fake automatic weapons – and doing the Nazi salute as they marched. It was not the first time Al-Quds sponsored a grisly hatefest against Israel and the Jews.

    Perhaps the academic freedom that so concerns you is at Haifa University that has just refused to award an honorary doctorate to Nobel prize winning Professor Robert Aumann whose right wing views were not compatible with the University’s philosophy. Wow, a Jewish university refusing to honor a distinguished Jewish professor because he’s not left wing enough? That should warrant a boycott or two.

    Maybe the academic freedom you are so concerned with has to do with Palestinian students held up at check points causing them to miss their exams, or arriving late to deliver class assignments. If that’s the case, then I agree that blacklisting Israel is a reasonable punishment. Any country that erects barriers to keep out terrorists should be punished. Speaking of boycotts: while you’re at it, maybe you should encourage the ASA to boycott Syrian educational institutions and instructors in response to Bashar Assad’s refusal to allow polio shots for kids in rebel areas.

    Professor Marez, we have never met. So for all I know, some of your best friends may be Jewish. You may even have a Jewish attorney or accountant or doctor. But I wish you would get your true feelings on the table. When asked why the ASA chose Israel instead of far worse human rights violators, you stated that you had to start somewhere. Please explain the logic in boycotting a minor violator while ignoring the worst. Is there not a moral sickness at work here? And is not the moral sickness a hatred of Jews and their country?

    Larry Shapiro

    • TellingTheTruth

      You are repeating fabricated misinformation from a hack job that massively cut down Marez’s original quotation so right-wingers like Dershowitz and Goldberg could repeat the same reductive 5 words endlessly without confronting the substance of what was said. The writer from the Atlantic repeats the same fabrication, abetted by a NY Times editor who cut back Marez’s quote to 5 words after the first version of the story included two paragraphs explaining the ASA’s position in more detail. Here is the rest of the quote: “He argued that the United States has “a particular responsibility to answer the call for boycott because it is the largest supplier of military aid to the state of Israel.” While acknowledging that the same could be said of a number of oppressive governments, past and present, he said that in those countries, civil society groups had not asked his association for a boycott, as Palestinian groups have.” Both of these things are true, but it’s far easier for right-wing hacks to generate a reductive meme that pretends this is all Marez said. It would appear that those producing this reductive meme are incapable of confronting the real arguments about this serious issue, if he is reduced to this level of irresponsible, shoddy journalism.

      • Much has been written about the military aid, $3 billion each for Israel and Egypt.

        FYI, American “foreign aid” is mostly provided to allies as a rebate on buying military equipment produced by American firms, including Raytheon’s Patriot missiles and radars, and other nice big ticket items, such as Lockheed-Martin F-16 fighter jets, etc.

        Keep in mind, in this context, “allies” really means “military allies,” as in when the US Army comes calling, they’d rather assume your little country has all the right military tools that might be required to do the job. America likes when it’s friends have the latest kit ready to go.

        As for the money, if you’ve ever redeemed a coupon, you know that even with the discount, you still have to fork over a lot of cash. It may not be the full price, but without the discount you wouldn’t have spent anything at all, so it makes sense for buyer and seller.

        This is how American firms get their money from foreign governments. Cut the coupon and American defense firms will sell less.

        “Foreign aid” is government leverage and the only form of “inducement” allowed by US firms in foreign countries. Real patriots want more coupons to induce more purchases. The defense business is America’s business.

    • Mr. Shapiro: That’s a fine letter.

      Could you explain :

      1. Who you are and what you do?
      2. Who is Mr Marez and what does he do ?

      Thank you

      Alan Bernson
      Boston, MA

    • beautifullu stated. Thank You

Leave a Reply

Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition.


Current day month ye@r *

More...

  • Book Reviews Opinion Robert Gates’ Memoir is a Jaw-Dropping Read (REVIEW)

    Robert Gates’ Memoir is a Jaw-Dropping Read (REVIEW)

    Former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates’s memoir follows the classic form, telling the story of his years at the Pentagon during the Bush and Obama administrations. He focuses on what he did and experienced personally as secretary, neither writing a broad policy treatise nor recounting the entire history of the administrations in which he served. In so doing, Gates provides penetrating insights about the inner workings of US national security decision-making. Had I been George W. Bush, I would [...]

    Read more →
  • Beliefs and concepts Book Reviews The Media, Israel, and Anti-Semitism (REVIEW)

    The Media, Israel, and Anti-Semitism (REVIEW)

    Pressing Israel: Media Bias Exposed from A-Z by Lee Bender and Jerome Verlin (Pavilion Press, Philadelphia, Pa. 2013) Sophocles said, “What people believe prevails over truth,” Pressing Israel: Media Bias Exposed from A-Z is ideal for the arm chair reader who would like a basic grasp of the terms used in the mainstream media’s presentation of the Arab-Israeli situation as is reported today. This is a book whose time has come. This is a book where the reader gains a [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Blogs William Shatner’s One Man Show Keeps Him in the Limelight (INTERVIEW)

    William Shatner’s One Man Show Keeps Him in the Limelight (INTERVIEW)

    JNS.org – On Thursday, audiences around the country can feel what it is like to be William Shatner, the Jewish actor best known for his portrayal of Captain James T. Kirk on “Star Trek.” Shatner’s one-man show “Shatner’s World”—which was on Broadway and toured Canada, Australia, and the United States—will be presented in nearly 700 movie theaters nationwide for one night only on April 24. Sponsored by Fathom Events and Priceline.com (for whom Shatner has famously served as a pitchman), [...]

    Read more →
  • Blogs Book Reviews The Origins of Palestinian Refugee Relief Efforts (REVIEW)

    The Origins of Palestinian Refugee Relief Efforts (REVIEW)

    Romirowsky and Joffe’s book Religion, Politics and the Origins of Palestine Refugee Relief is an important volume for those interested in truly understanding the origins of the Palestinian refugee issue. Utilizing a treasure trove of newly released documents, the authors link UNRWA’s (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine) origins to the Quakers/American Friends Service Committee (AFSC). For those readers who thought they knew most of the Middle East story, Romirowsky and Joffe’s version provides another twist. The authors meticulously [...]

    Read more →
  • Sports Israeli Soccer Team Faces Prospect of International Ban

    Israeli Soccer Team Faces Prospect of International Ban

    The Israel National soccer team could be facing a World Cup ban, and other soccer sanctions, unless it alleviates travel restrictions and increases field access for Palestinian players and coaches. The head of the Palestinian Football Association is pushing for international soccer’s governing body, the Federation of International Football Associations (FIFA), to issue a ban on Israel competing internationally, claiming Israel’s restrictive travel for Palestinians is equivalent to a form of oppression. “It’s not only the athletes,” Jibril Rajoub explains. [...]

    Read more →
  • Beliefs and concepts Book Reviews Jewish Author of ‘Eat to Live’ Dishes on Health Care, Nutrition, Disease Prevention

    Jewish Author of ‘Eat to Live’ Dishes on Health Care, Nutrition, Disease Prevention

    JNS.org – While the national debate on “Obamacare” rages on past the recent March 31 sign-up deadline, bestselling Jewish author Dr. Joel Fuhrman says the “current disease care model of what we call ‘health care’ cannot possibly be sustained.” “There is simply not enough money available to support a system in which the lion’s share of expenditures is devoted to acute care, with virtually nothing being spent on preventive medicine, i.e. health care,” Fuhrman says in an interview. “To make [...]

    Read more →
  • Arts and Culture Jewish Identity ‘Tears of Color’ Art Exhibit Shows Struggles of Israelis With Eating Disorders

    ‘Tears of Color’ Art Exhibit Shows Struggles of Israelis With Eating Disorders

    JNS.org – “This is how I want to be—without fear. Independent. I want to be like a bird. I want to spread my wings.” So reads part of the description beneath one of the 30 paintings on display until the end of May at the ZOA House in Tel Aviv. The collection represents the first-ever art exhibit of its kind: an exhibit created entirely by Israelis in treatment for eating disorders. Dubbed “Tears of Color,” based on one of the [...]

    Read more →
  • Beliefs and concepts Book Reviews Overprotective or Loving? Daughters Reflect on Jewish Mothers in New Anthology

    Overprotective or Loving? Daughters Reflect on Jewish Mothers in New Anthology

    JNS.org – Rachel Ament noticed that she and her friends often shared humorous anecdotes that were typically variations on a theme: overprotective, worrying Jewish moms who smothered them with love. That included Ament’s own mother. “My mom is probably every Jewish stereotype scrunched into one,” the Washington, DC, resident tells JNS.org. “At the root of all these stereotypical, worrying, overprotective moms, is love.” A social media writer for Capital One, as well as a freelance writer, Ament decided about three years [...]

    Read more →



Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.