New York Times Silently Changes ‘1967 Borders With Palestine’
Error: Contact form not found.
by Elder of Ziyon
On Friday, I noted that The New York Times sneaked in a new phrase in an article about Obama and Netanyahu, referring to the “1967 borders with Palestine” – a nonsensical phrase that the newspaper had never used before.
On Saturday, they changed it, as NewsDiffs shows:
That was the only substantial difference between those two versions of the article. But there was no acknowledgement of the correction, and of course the print version has the original nonsense phrase.
It is still wrong, of course: they weren’t borders but 1949 armistice lines, never agreed to as border by the international community as UNSC 242 makes clear. But the NYT has erroneously referred to them as “borders” for decades as I showed in my original piece.
Newspapers that subscribe to the New York Times News Service still have the old phrase as well.
Lebanon Announces Partial Ceasefire Between Israel, Hezbollah but Attacks Continue
Barcelona Sauna Apologizes After Jewish American Women Denied Entry Over Star of David Necklaces
Terror-Tied Group to Host ‘Assembly of Militants’ in Toronto to Mark Oct. 7 Attack Anniversary
French Far-Left Leader, Presidential Candidate Under Fire for Antisemitism Threatens Israel With Military Force
France Bans Israel From Major Weapons Show, Jerusalem Slams ‘Disgraceful Decision’
NYPD Implements ‘Most Extensive Security Plan Ever’ for Israel Day Parade Without Mamdani
Far-Left, Pro-Hamas Streamer Hasan Piker Banned From UK, Forced to Miss Appearance at SXSW London Festival
Ceasefire Very Likely to End if Israeli Attacks on Hezbollah Persist, Iranian TV Says
Israel’s Netanyahu Orders Attacks on Hezbollah in Beirut’s Southern Suburbs








What the Book of Genesis Can Teach Us about AI
The Media Keeps Getting the Story Wrong on Israel and Gaza’s Schools
Will the Art of a Deal Happen in Iran?
Israel’s Netanyahu Orders Attacks on Hezbollah in Beirut’s Southern Suburbs
Israel Is Losing Public Support Because It Has Completely Lost the Narrative



