Monday, May 21st | 7 Sivan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

September 4, 2016 2:33 am

Experts: Iran’s Decision to Fortify Nuke Site With S-300 Missiles Is ‘Very Peculiar’

avatar by Sean Savage /

Email a copy of "Experts: Iran’s Decision to Fortify Nuke Site With S-300 Missiles Is ‘Very Peculiar’" to a friend
Satellite view of the Fordo facility near Qom, Iran. Photo: DigitalGlobe.

Satellite view of the Fordo facility near Qom, Iran. Photo: DigitalGlobe. – On Aug. 28, Iranian state television broadcast live images of Russian-made, highly advance S-300 surface-to-air missiles being transported by trucks to the Fordo nuclear facility south of Tehran. The move by Iran to further fortify one of its most secretive nuclear sites has led to questions over its intentions at the site, while also raising doubts about their commitment to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) or Iran nuclear deal that was agreed to by Iran and the world powers last July.

During the weapons delivery, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a speech, “Continued opposition and hype on the S-300 or the Fordo site are examples of the viciousness of the enemy. The S-300 system is a defense system, not an assault one, but the Americans did their best for Iran not to get hold of it.”

The S-300 surface-to-air-missile was initially developed under the old Soviet Union, and its newer variants are regarded as the most potent anti-aircraft missile systems in the world.

Russia began delivering the highly advanced S-300 missile system last April, just months after many international sanctions were lifted against the Islamic Republic as a result of the nuclear deal.

The deal to supply Iran with the S-300 was originally signed in 2007, but was held up for several years due to international sanctions as well as objections by the US and Israel, that argued it would make a possible military strike on the site more difficult. There have also been concerns the system could end up in the hands of Iranian-backed terror groups such as Hezbollah.

“As per the nuclear agreement, very little is being done at Fordo,” he said. “So you have to scratch your head and wonder why the heck they did this at Fordo instead of Natanz [uranium enrichment plant], where, after all, there are 5,060 centrifuges and where they are not underground.”

The Fordo nuclear site, located 60 miles south of Tehran and built 300 feet below a mountain, was initially built in secret by Iran until satellite imagery forced the Islamic Republic to acknowledge its existence in 2009. In 2011, Iran told the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations nuclear watchdog, that it was planning to produce medium-enriched uranium, up to about 20 percent, at the site, which Western powers feared could be easily enriched into weapons-grade uranium.

Under the nuclear deal, Iran is not permitted to enrich uranium at the site for 15 years and its remaining 1,044 centrifuges allowed at the site will only by permitted for scientific research.

Elevated suspicion

Ilan Berman, vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council think tank, told this move elevates suspicion over what Iran is doing at Fordo.

“This certainly raises questions over their transparency and what they are using the site for,” Berman said. “This move tells you this is an important strategic site for Iran and they have serious doubts that the military option [for the US or Israel] is not off the table.”

Berman added he thinks this is a good indication how fragile the Iranians think the deal is, and that Fordo matters a lot to them.

Iranian Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps’ (IRGC) air defense force, told Iranian state TV recently that, “Our main priority is to protect Iran’s nuclear facilities under any circumstances.”

However, Esmaili did not indicate whether or not the system was yet operational, only adding: “Today, Iran’s sky is one of the most secure in the Middle East.”

Representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY), a member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, told, “This development begs the question that if Iran didn’t need S-300 surface-to-air missiles to protect Fordo before the Iran Nuclear Deal was implemented, why would it be necessary now? This is just further evidence that the unsigned ‘political commitment’ called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was not what it was hyped to be, unless, of course, you are Iran or Russia.”

Berman explained the real culprit here are the Russians, who see bolstering Iran’s defenses as a key part of their overall strategy in the Middle East.

“For Russia, which is relying on Iran for its campaign in Syria and more things, Moscow wants Iran more secure, not less,” he said. “A stronger Iran is better for them.”

The situation concerning the Fordo site comes amid further questions over the legitimacy of the nuclear deal with the P5+1 (US, UK, France, Germany, China and Russia) and Iran’s behavior.

The deal

report, released by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security on Sept. 1, which based its information from several government officials involved in the negotiations, indicated the US and its international partners agreed “in secret” to allow Iran to evade certain restrictions in the landmark nuclear deal in order for the Islamic Republic to meet its Jan. 16 deadline for international sanctions relief.

“The exemptions or loopholes are happening in secret, and it appears that they favor Iran,” said David Albright, a former United Nations weapons inspector and co-author of the report, Reuters reported.

Among the exceptions outlined, two allowed Iran to exceed the deal’s limits on the quantity of low-enriched uranium (LEU), which can be used to make highly-enriched and weapons-grade uranium.

Additionally, a US Defense Department report in early August stated that Iran has gradually improved both its cyber abilities and developed more advanced ballistic missiles since the singing of the nuclear deal with world powers in July 2015.

The Islamic Republic now has a “substantial inventory of missiles capable of reaching targets throughout the region, including US military bases and Israel,” the Pentagon said in an unclassified summary, Bloomberg News reported.

The Washington Institute’s Clawson believes that Iran may have placed the missiles at Fordo as a political statement.

“Domestic politics is driving this more than anything else,” he said. “Their presidential election is coming up next year and this is a way for them to show how tough they are.”

Despite the move by Iran to bolster the defense at one of its most secretive nuclear sites, Berman does not believe the US or the international community will do much to confront this.

“We are going to let this pass just like we let the Russian use of Iranian airspace pass as well,” said Berman, referring to Russia’s move to conduct airstrikes in Syria from a military base in Iran.

“You are seeing a lot of disjointed policy. There is nothing to deal with a rapidly expanding Iran-Russia relationship either in the US or Israel,” he added.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Martin

    I’m beginning to wonder whether the only valid agreement in conjunction with the JCPOA is a side-deal between Obama and the Ayatollahs that Iran will not attack the US until after Obama is out of office.

  • nat cheiman

    Its not peculiar at all. The Iranians are dishonest and have no intention of keeping to the terms of the agreement.

  • If you have nothing to hide then why are your hiding??

  • stevenl

    Empowering the enemy!

  • Yoel Nitzarim

    One would have to wonder why the US would take such a milquetoast approach such an obviously aggressive posturing by Teheran even with the upcoming presidential elections in the next year. What may Iran be hiding at this “secretive” nuclear facility, and how might the facility be employed in the near future to enrich nuclear-grade uranium despite the Iran deal? The bitter hated of the ayatollahs toward Israel and US assets in the region should not be underestimated as a motivating force to hit America targets and Israel long before the 15-year moratorium to break out as a nuclear power is reached.

  • brenrod

    Obama wanted to weaken the US and the west and he has suceeded

    • ray

      spot on. except his real name is ayatolla obama.

  • a Zambian citizen

    Germany works for Israel. YOU LOST WW2 … 😉

  • Greg Bacon

    What about an in-depth article about the 300 or so nukes that Israel has and why they consistently refuse to join the NPT or even let US personnel look at their nukes?

    You could also explain why Israel has the SAMSON option, which is their plan to nuke the entire planet if they don’t always get their way, sort of a nuclear hissy fit.

    Finish the article by looking into Israel’s chemical and biological weapons, again not subject to any treaties.

    And please, stop the Iranian war mongering. In case you haven’t noticed, Israel’s merc army, the USA, is sick and tired of fighting and dying for the glory of Eretz Israel.
    If Israel wants to attack Iran, go ahead, just leave us Americans out of your sadistic and twisted plans.

    • Mike P

      Greg, it is Israel that is fighting and dying for the US.

      The US has never fought a war for Israel and that’s exactly the way Israel wants it.

      Israel insists upon defending itself, by itself.

      Israel needs nukes because it is the only country on earth credibly and many times threatened with total genocide over decades.

      Something tells me that any annihilation of Israel or of Jews would actually make you happy and certainly wouldn’t make you sad.

      As for the Samson option, this is a theory without a good basis and the theory applies with even any credibility only to Israel’s current declared enemies, not to the world.

      All nuclear powers have pretty much the identical plan, which is what mutually assured destruction is about, which is exactly what has succeeded in preventing nuclear war so far during 70 years.

      But having a dual standard for Israel doesn’t bother bigots such as you, Greg.

    • Lawrence Wald

      >>>Israel’s merc army, the USA, is sick and tired of fighting and dying for the glory of Eretz Israel.<<<

      I had no idea that US army troops have ever fought and died for Israel. To prove your credibility, could you please give us specific examples with location and dates? Failure to do so would bring your credibility into question.