Tuesday, October 17th | 27 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
September 27, 2012 2:34 am

Obama and Clinton in Defense of Islam

avatar by Edward Alexander

Email a copy of "Obama and Clinton in Defense of Islam" to a friend

President Obama speaks in Cairo. Photo: Chuck Kennedy.

On June 4, 2009, addressing an audience in Cairo, Egypt, Barack Obama declared that “America is not—and never will be—at war with Islam” and that “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” True to his word, Obama has now carried his struggle against defamation of Islam to Pakistani television, where, in an official U.S. government film, he and his Secretary of State have recently been denouncing the Mohammed-mocking short video called “Innocence of Muslims.” They have excoriated this YouTube trailer frequently enough to reinforce the mad belief that every film produced, every book printed in this country comes within the purview of the government.  On the State Department film critique, the president declares that “we reject the efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.”   Mrs. Clinton adds that “the U. S. government had absolutely nothing to do with this video” and “we absolutely reject its content.” For the acts of savagery in Benghazi and elsewhere supposedly triggered by what the president called in his UN General Assembly address of 25 September the “crude and disgusting”  video,  Clinton has reserved  her  favorite epithet of severe disapprobation:  “unacceptable.”

This campaign on behalf of (supposedly beleaguered) Islam has already registered considerable successes.  Any reader of newspapers, and not only those in thrall to  liberal sycophancy,  will notice the way in which standard usage now reserves for Islam a place of honor denied to Christianity or Judaism.  Everywhere in the news media we find allusions to “the Prophet Mohammed,” capital-P and all.  The equivalent deferential usage would be “Christ our Savior” or “Moses our Teacher,” and either would be ludicrous to see in print anywhere but in a parochial religious publication or context.

How far back, one begins to wonder, will the Obama administration’s campaign against “negative stereotypes of Islam” eventually extend? What effect will it have on, for example, the college curriculum? In Dante’s Inferno, long a fixture of Great Books courses in America and other countries,  we find in Canto 28, verses 30-31 the “mutilated Mahomet,”  consigned to Hell along with “other disseminators of scandal and of schism.” Will this passage be excised, along with Gustave Dore’s famous illustration of it, when the imams decide to publicize it for riot incitement, or will it merely be condemned by the White House and State Department?

In the eighteenth century  play (later turned into one of Mozart’s greatest  operas) called “Le Mariage de Figaro” by Beaumarchais, we find the following speech, by a character who is a writer: “I put together a comedy of manners set in the seraglio (harem)…I think I can criticize Mahomet without scruples: straight away an envoy…from I don’t know where, arrives to complain that my verses cause offense in the Sublime Porte (the Ottoman capital), Persia, part of the Indian subcontinent, all of Egypt, the kingdoms of Barca (Ethiopia), Tripoli, Algeria and Morocco: and hey  presto! My comedy is incinerated, to satisfy Mahometan princes of whom none, as far as I know, can even read, while they bruise our backs, calling us Christian dogs.” Will the government have to censor, or at least censure, Beaumarchais?

Related coverage

October 16, 2017 4:55 pm
0

Trump Should End the Iran Nuclear Deal

On the day when Jews were celebrating Simchat Torah, US President Donald Trump was making history by speaking boldly against the...

Luckily, Mozart dropped this theme from his opera. But he was less lucky with his “Turkish” opera entitled “The Abduction from the Seraglio,” which deals with the clash of values between Christianity and Islam.  No conductor who wishes to live beyond opening night now dares to touch this opera, except in bowdlerized form—such as a  1997 American version  which changes the torture to be inflicted on the heroine by a sheikh into a lavishing of seductive gifts. Muslim threats of violence (beheading provided at no extra charge) have effectively removed the opera from the repertoire. (In 2006 the Deutsche Oper Berlin dropped Mozart’s Idomeneo from its schedule because of anonymous threats to performers and audience. The likely provocation was a scene in which the heads of Jesus, Mahomet, Buddha, and Poseidon are carried onto the stage.)

And what will be the fate of John Stuart Mill’s ON LIBERTY (1859), perhaps the most articulate defense of freedom of expression ever written, because of the passage, which many would apply  to September’s  rampaging mobs in  post-Qaddafi  Libya and post-Mubarak Egypt and post-Ben Ali Tunisia:

“Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided the end be their improvement, and the means justified by actually effecting that end. Liberty, as a principle, has no application to any state of things anterior to the time when mankind have become capable of being improved by free and equal discussion. Until then, there is nothing for them but implicit obedience to an Akbar or a Charlemagne, if they are so fortunate as to fine one.” Here we have not only an oblique allusion to the backwardness of “the East” but also a prescient sharp criticism of those who waxed euphoric over the Arab Spring before it entered its autumnal phase.

More is at stake in the Obama administration’s attempt to divert attention from the catastrophic failure of its policies of outreach, engagement, and apology than the fate of a wretched 14-minute film dredged up from obscurity by Islamists to justify their well-planned violence, carefully scheduled for the anniversary of 9/11.

Edward Alexander’s most recent book is The State of the Jews: A Critical Appraisal (Transaction Publishers).

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Thank you Professor Alexander for reminding us that freedom must be defended and that Islam is a totalitarian, militaristic Jew hating ideology that must either be submitted to or crushed. One or two tactical nukes on Tehran and Mecca would get the attention of the cowardly followers of Mohammed.

  • Jerry Hersch

    Are Western outposts “interlopers”…What is an ‘alien’ imposition in a basically homogeneous society.
    We have heard arguments for the past number of years about Hispanics and their integration into what we boastfully call a “Melting Pot”..arguments rife with myths and stereotypes. The sort of stuff that helped ignite the Pogroms.
    Islam is not a two-faced monolith divided Sunni and Shia..It crosses many cultures and socities all of which have imposed their own imprint…Just as Christianity is not just a Catholic-Protestant-Orthodox mix…Nor Judaism divided just between Sephardim and Ashkenazi.
    Had Judaism been a prosselytizing religion it would have more diversity..
    One has only to look at a dual Israeli society of Euro-Jews and those on North African/MidEast descent.. animosities and prejudice.
    We,America,is not a foe of Islam..just how it is interpreted ..in its modern context, just as Christianity has moved from the Council of Elvira,islam is coming to live in harmony with other groups.In some of its more radical interpretation preached to the poor and illiterate who have had little or no interaction with “others” it is a weapon.
    The Haredi in Israel have desecrated over the past month both Moslem and Christian places of worship.They have spat on Orthodox Jews..not Orthodox enough…and thrown stones..I’ve had a good size projectile bounce off a vehicle.that could have done harm..I was an “interloper”
    Prejudice fools not caring if damage is physical or mental live in all societies..in all religions

  • Jerry Hersch

    My wife who had started teaching at Albany Med in New York left teaching medical school during WWII to work on both the penicillin and the morphine projects.While on those projects she worked with physicain scientists from all over the nation including the South.Serious at work they were often took time to poke fun at each others backgrounds including religion.
    After the war at the time of Truman’s integration of the armed services..Strom Thurmond’s revolt..and the start of Jews “heading South” tensions were high.
    She joined a small group of physicians opening one of the first fully integrated medical facilities in the Deep South.Small town South Carolina.
    Within a couple of weeks warnings came as to what to joke about..what to say.. how to behave..veiled insinuations and anonymous notes..and even the refusal to be served in a couple of local stores.
    Yankee..Jew..race mingler..Yes the threats abounded in this nation..How many led to violence ??
    We can all remember the synagogue bombings of the 1960s..for these same supposed reasons.
    A synagogue ..by “supposed” Christians
    An embassy by “supposed” Moslems…

  • The author hits the nail on the head. Our 1st Amendment rights are in danger when we must tip-toe around the mention or reference to one religion…Do I hear censorship when our government makes such requests? All faiths have been subject to both praise and ridicule however did we choose riot, damage property or kill. The 9/11 timing for violance with the excuse of the video is an absudity as the video circulated for months earlier. They choose 9/11. It was a clear message to the West who should observe the rising tide of danger….as it has the making of ‘Islamization’ of America and I hope we speak out loud and clear…NO.

  • Sharia is moving very quickly to usurp the Constitution as the law of the land because Obama believes his only job..notwithstanding his oath of office…is to be a full time PR Director for CAIR..an unindicted coconspirator in the Holy Land terror prosecution.

  • Tabitha Korol

    A much-needed work, written bravely and truthfully, that should be read by all – and I’ll do my best to disseminate the information!

Algemeiner.com