Wednesday, March 21st | 5 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

July 26, 2013 10:43 am

TIME Magazine: Peace Talks May Fail Because of Israel

avatar by Zach Pontz

Email a copy of "TIME Magazine: Peace Talks May Fail Because of Israel" to a friend

A Palestinian and Israeli boy hug. Photo: Debbi Cooper.

TIME Magazine’s Jerusalem bureau chief, Karl Vick, published a list of reasons why he believes the newest round of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, announced last week, may fail, and Israel is at the top of the list.

Vick is no stranger to stirring up controversy with his coverage of Israel. A provocative cover story he penned in 2010, framed Israelis as being indifferent to the quest for peace, instead being more concerned with the value of real estate and “living the good life.”

In the first slot on his new list, titled “The Illusion of Progress: 9 Reasons Why Israeli-Palestinian Talks May Fail,” Vick writes that Benjamin Netanyahu’s vow Sunday to submit any final agreement to a public referendum “would likely sound the death knell for an agreement based – as any to emerge from [U.S. Secretary of State John] Kerry’s planned talks would have to be – upon the Oslo Accords, the 1994 framework for a Palestinian state…”

Furthermore, Vick claims that “polls consistently show most Israelis want a peace agreement but do not believe one will come, one reason surely being that most Israelis reject the specific concessions a deal almost certainly would entail. To take only one issue: Two out of three centrist Israelis in one recent poll refuse to divide Jerusalem, the city Palestinians insist must also serve as their capital.”

As his second-most likely reason for failed talks, Vick writes that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s coalition would hijack any attempt at a peace deal, and he even dismisses government coalition partner Yesh Atid’s leader Yair Lapid’s public declarations in support of peace as being disingenuous.

“The former anchorman says he wants talks, but perhaps only for the sake of talks: Lapid is among the centrists who is not willing to share Jerusalem. ‘Jerusalem is not a place,’ he told the New York Times in May. ‘It’s an idea,'” Vick writes.

Anonymous pro-Israel blogger Elder of Ziyon commented on the Vick article on his blog, criticizing the TIME journalist for failing to take Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to task for the very same promise.

“Mahmoud Abbas said the exact same thing, that he would hold a referendum,” Elder of Ziyon wrote. “Vick doesn’t see this as a problem (if he is even aware of it.) There is no doubt that the Palestinian Arabs would overwhelmingly reject any deal that does not include the ‘right to return’ and destroy Israel demographically, or that would allow Israel to keep Jewish neighborhoods around Jerusalem, things that are non-starters for Israel.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • wrapping up business from Dec 2015. I never heard back from Algemeiner. Please send me payment of $180 for publishing my photograph ( black and white image of two boys, one Arab and one Jewish). Below are my details and I”d appreciate hearing back from one of your staff this time. thank you , Debbi Cooper

    DEBBI COOPER Photographer
    Reuven Street 1
    Jerualem, Israel 93510
    tel +972 2 6717360

  • I know this article appeared a while ago, but I am only seeing it now. The photograph that appears of a jewish and arab boy hugging is taken by me and not stand with us. I know you are a reputable publication , and am asking that you have one of your editors contact me. Thank you, Debbi Cooper ( you can see on my website that I photographed that image.)

  • What else should be expected from beneath contempt ‘journalism’?
    Has Vick read or listened to the anti Jewish (NOT Israeli) egregious attacks by all forms of media (and school books paid for by the West)?
    Gutter snipes like the Jew hating Vick are a dime a dozen these days masquerading as moral even handed reporters.
    Not a single one of them asks even the simplest of questions:
    1 With whom should Israel talk, Hamas or the PLO?
    2 Since BOTH Hamas & PLO charters demand the destruction of Israel, what should the Israelis talk to these genocidal creatures about?
    3 From 1948 till 1967 (19 long years) there was no Israeli occupation of the West Bank or Gaza. There were no settlers. There were no settlements. Yet, there was no peace BUT the same attempt to EXTERMINATE the Jews
    4 After their stunning victory in 1967, the Israelis told the Arabs that they were willing to return all the conquered territories for PEACE. Jamal Abdul Nasser & the Arabs came back with the Khartoum Declaration in August 1967: No Peace, No Negotiations, No Recognition.
    Why does this imbecile Vick think that the Arabs have changed their minds yet preemptively blame any failure to Israel?
    IQ al Rassooli

  • mika

    NYTimes = CIA = Vatican

    The Vatican ratlines,..

    The persecution of Orthodox Christians via al-CIA-da (in Syria, Egypt, Kosovo, etc), Jews, and other “heretics” — it is all directed from ROME. Washington is a subsidiary of the Vatican.

  • E Pluribus Beagle

    Well it is Karl Vick. What did you expect.