Thursday, March 22nd | 6 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

November 24, 2013 1:24 pm

U.S. Senator Schumer: ‘Disproportionality’ of Iran Deal Makes Bi-Partisan Sanctions Likely

avatar by Joshua Levitt

Email a copy of "U.S. Senator Schumer: ‘Disproportionality’ of Iran Deal Makes Bi-Partisan Sanctions Likely" to a friend
U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Photo: WikiCommons.

U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Photo: WikiCommons.

U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer said on Sunday he was “disappointed” by the terms of the agreement reached overnight between Iran and world powers “because it does not seem proportional,” with the lopsidedness of the give-and-take likely to lead to bi-partisan support for further sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

“Iran simply freezes its nuclear capabilities while we reduce the sanctions,” the senator said in a statement. “It was strong sanctions, not the goodness of the hearts of the Iranian leaders, that brought Iran to the table, and any reduction relieves the psychological pressure of future sanctions and gives them hope that they will be able to gain nuclear weapon capability while further sanctions are reduced. A fairer agreement would have coupled a reduction in sanctions with a proportionate reduction in Iranian nuclear capability.”

“The goal of the administration is to eliminate all of Iran’s nuclear weapons-making capability by the end of the final negations; it is still my hope they can achieve that goal,” he said.

“As for additional sanctions, this disproportionality of this agreement makes it more likely that Democrats and Republicans will join together and pass additional sanctions when we return in December. I intend to discuss that possibility with my colleagues.”

Presenting the agreement on Saturday night, U.S. President Barack Obama asked the world to judge Iran on its ability to comply with the terms of the agreement, particularly the International Atomic Energy Agency inspections into all of its hidden nuclear laboratories. If Iran does not comply, Obama said renewed sanctions would be significantly harsher.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • albert rosenblatt

    Yossi Beilin [ former Israeli justice minister ] disagrees with Netanyahu — He feels it is a very good deal — and that Netanyahu is both very scared as well as stupid.

    • Francis Deutsch

      I do so agree with him and you.

  • Where was Schumer before this sucker’s deal was struck? He was nowhere to be found. As a Jew it is clear to me that he is a member of the Obama Court Jews for whom leftist ideology trumps Israel’s existence.

    When Iran gets the nuclear bomb, we will hear Obama say the same things that he has said about Obamacare: he has “discovered” that Iran cannot be trusted; he is “sorry” that Israel is in “this situation”.

  • Titus Greenwood

    Well, Chuck U. Schumer (LSD-NY), among all Liberal Socialist ideologues, should know well, that 0bama is no friend of Jews, or of Israel! There will soon, be a cot there in a FEMA Camp, for old Chuck U. as there will for millions of others.

  • yussi

    I dont doubt the presidents intention,but when dealing with murderers,supporters of world wide terrorism and people who openly call for your complete annihalation it is impossible to be idealistic. Realistic is in order and that requires a complete understanding that their word is meaningless…

  • Straightshooter

    Schumer´s got it right! Strengthen sanctions rather than rely on Iranian promises. Actions speak louder than words.