Thursday, May 24th | 10 Sivan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

May 8, 2014 10:22 am

WhatsApp Ban Shows Iran’s True Colors

avatar by Ronald S. Lauder

Email a copy of "WhatsApp Ban Shows Iran’s True Colors" to a friend
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with WhatsApp Founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton, in Silicon Valley, on March 5, 2014.

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with WhatsApp Founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton, in Silicon Valley, on March 5, 2014.

This week, the Islamic Republic apparently banned the popular WhatsApp messaging application, which is owned by Facebook, reportedly because Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is an “American Zionist” – a code word for “Jew.”

The state-run Iranian News Agency attributed the ban to Abdolsamad Khorramabadi, head of Iran’s Committee on Internet Crimes. Soon after, however, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani tweeted that the ban was not true.

Hard to tell what the truth is here. The Iranian government has been known to say one thing in Persian for internal consumption while saying something quite different in English to the rest of the world. Some suggested the report and its rebuttal represented jockeying among hardline and more moderate factions. A ban might be academic, because the Internet is severely restricted in Iran anyway. Twitter and Facebook are officially banned, although many Iranians access the sites through third-party providers and some regime figures, like Rouhani, use the platforms to communicate with the West.

The real meaning of the episode, however, is clear: As Iran has demonstrated many times, it is a dictatorship that uses anti-Semitism disguised as anti-Zionism in order to create bogeymen and control its populace. Its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has repeatedly denied the Holocaust, most recently during a speech in late March. Iranian proxies Hamas and Hezbollah continue to rain rockets on Israel.

Nothing has changed.

President Rouhani can tweet all he wants and smile in front of Western cameras, but his charm offensive cannot disguise the extremism, bigotry, cruelty, and repressiveness of the Iranian regime. Rouhani promised a change, including more openness. Yet on his watch, censorship of the Internet has been strengthened, not relaxed. Rouhani tries to present himself as a responsible statesman with whom the West can do business. Yet his regime still traffics in hatred.

We can only hope that the Iranian people are resourceful enough to evade the shackles of their government’s censorship, and that they are open-minded enough to see through their leaders’ attempts to manipulate them.

We must also remind those countries rushing to welcome back a supposedly more moderate Iran into the world community: It is not a new Iran, but the same Iran with a (not really so) new face.

Ronald S. Lauder is president of the World Jewish Congress. This column originally appeared on his blog at

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • I seriously don’t understand what good is going to come out of it.

  • That seriously sucks. WhatsApp is simply an application and what bad will it d to anyone! Its a means of communication.

  • Oh boy that sucks. Dont these country have freedom of speech?

  • National Council of Resistance of Iran, a broad coalition of democratic Iranian organizations, groups, and personalities, was founded in 1981 in Tehran, Iran on the initiative of Massoud Rajavi, the leader of the Iranian Resistance. For more information visit

  • BH in Iowa

    The 1979 US Embassy attack was probably the first clue to Iran’s true colors.

  • 9763546355

  • ChangeIranNow

    Just another clear example of how the Iranian regime struggles to stem the tide of technology, especially social media. It has already banned Facebook and Twitter and banning WhatsApp will just be the tip of the iceberg that will probably involve SnapChat, Instagram, Vine, Reddit, Tumblr and every other method of sharing uncensored information. The fact that Iran is doing this under the guise of objecting to Mark Zuckerberg because he’s Jewish is just one more nail in the coffin of Iranian President Rouhani’s claim of moderation. There are no moderates in a nation controlled by the whims of a single supreme religious leader accountable to no one.

  • kia

    Ironic how an article highlighting anti-semtism sounds a lot like blatent Iranophobia.

    • shloime

      a “phobia” is an irrational fear. there is nothing irrational about fearing a country with 10x the population and 80x the size, which continually threatens to wipe you off the map.

      so stop using big-sounding words if you don’t understand what they mean.

  • Fred

    Do not trust the smile of a crocodile.

  • How do you feel now, after President Rouhani’s use of his veto to prevent the ban? It pretty much invalidates the whole point that the article tries to advance, and proves the opposite, instead.

    • shloime

      i would say that rouhani is in charge of pr; the fact remains that the islamist republic of iran would ban an information service based on such criteria, and continues to pump out antisemitic drivel on a daily basis. and the real power in iran is khamenei, who has not changed his tune one bit.