Tuesday, July 5th | 6 Tammuz 5782

June 6, 2014 10:38 am

MLA Members Reject Resolution Condemning Israel

avatar by JNS.org

A Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) protest against Israel in Melbourne, Australia, on June 5, 2010. Photo: Mohamed Ouda via Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.orgThe membership of the Modern Language Association (MLA) did not ratify Resolution 2014-1, which condemns Israel for denying “academics of Palestinian ethnicity entry into the West Bank,” in a vote that concluded at midnight June 1.

The resolution stated that the entry restrictions violate international law, disrupt “instruction, research, and planning at Palestinian universities,” and restrict “the academic freedom of scholars and teachers who are United States citizens.”

But a report issued by MLA members opposing the resolution states that in 2012 only 142 Americans were denied entry to Israel and the disputed territories out of 626,000 who wanted to enter, a refusal rate of about 0.023 percent. The U.S. restricts entry to its own borders at a much higher rate—5.4 percent in 2012 for Israeli applications for “B” visas.

Related coverage

July 4, 2022 4:11 pm

Israeli Social Workers to Offer Psychological First Aid to Ukrainian Refugees in Moldova

A delegation of Israeli social workers has left for Moldova to aid Ukrainians who fled fighting in their country, as...

In order for a resolution to be considered the official position of the MLA, it must be ratified by a majority vote in which “the number of those voting for ratification equals at least 10 percent of the association’s membership, which was 2,390 votes this year,” MLA said on its website.

“There were 1,560 votes in favor of ratification and 1,063 votes against ratification. The vote therefore fell short of ratification by 830 votes,” said MLA.

Peggy Shapiro, an MLA member and Midwest director for the Israel education group StandWithUs, said in a statement, “Like other anti-Israel resolutions, the MLA resolution also erased all context to manipulate voters… It had only one purpose: to defame Israel. This resolution was discriminatory, singling out Israel for unfair and dishonest attacks.”

“We strongly support the principle of unrestricted scholarly travel, however this resolution only served to divide and politicize the MLA, rather than empower the organization to address more urgent matters facing higher education,” Israel Action Network Managing Director Geri Palast said in a statement.

MLA Members for Scholars Rights called the decision “a victory for responsible advocacy.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.