Guardian Website Spews Lies About Gaza Conflict
In the early hours of Tuesday, Israel launched a military operation against Hamas, Operation Protective Edge, in response to incessant Hamas rocket fire and the terror group’s refusal to agree to a ceasefire. Though the Guardian was relatively slow to respond to the story, at 13:45 Israeli time they finally launched a Live Blog on the war, titled ‘Israel steps up offensive against Gaza – live updates,’ edited by Matthew Weaver.
One of the first blog entries highlighted the analysis of Chris Doyle, Director of the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding (CAABU). (As BBC Watch has noted, CAABU is a pro-Palestinian advocacy group, and a well-established part of the Arab lobby in the U.K. “with no fewer than three MPs and two former MPs sitting on its executive committee.”)
Here’s an excerpt of the Guardian blog post:
The movement of Israeli forces and tanks to the edge of Gaza is a highly dangerous escalation, according to Caabu, the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding.
Related coverageJanuary 27, 2019 6:35 pm
Director Chris Doyle said:
A ceasefire must be followed by a completely new strategy for Gaza. This means the opening of the Gaza Strip not its closure. It means allowing legitimate economic activity to provide jobs, growth and hope. As stipulated in the Oslo Accords it also means ensuring that the West Bank and Gaza Strip remain part of one single territorial unit. There is no other alternative if Israelis and Palestinians want to enjoy security and peace.
The last thing the Middle East needs now is another bunch of pyromaniacs adding to the fire. Invading and smashing Gaza has never worked. It did not work in 1956, 1967, 1973, 1987-93, 2006, 2008-9, 2012 among other assaults, so why will an Israeli invasion work now?
There is no military solution to Gaza. And as horrific and futile an Israeli invasion would be, rocket attacks from Gaza are equally futile, wrong and when fired indiscriminately at civilians, a war crime.
Caabu has repeatedly argued that a failure to resolve the Gaza crisis will inevitably lead to a further conflagration …
First, note Doyle’s odd understanding of Israeli history. We’re evidently supposed to believe that the Suez Crisis of 1956, the Six Day War in 1967, and Yom Kippur War in 1973 – and even the 2006 Lebanon War! – all can be fairly characterized as examples of “invading and smashing Gaza“?
Further, concerning the actual recent wars in Gaza (2008-09 and 2012), and despite Doyle’s skepticism on the efficacy of military actions, it’s quite clear that both major IDF operations resulted in a dramatic and sustained decrease in Hamas rocket attacks.
Also of note is Doyle’s strategy for solving the conflict – ‘opening up Gaza’ – presumably by easing Israel’s blockade of illegal weapons, which conveniently overlaps with the demands set by Hamas, whose spokesperson earlier said that the group would not agree to a ceasefire until Israel’s blockade of Gaza ends.
Though Doyle does acknowledge that Hamas rocket attacks on Israeli civilians represent a war crime, he of course fails to factor in to the political equation Hamas’ refusal to accept Israel’s existence within any borders, their anti-Semitic ideology, and the explicitly genocidal threats of their leaders.
The words ‘War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing’ are of course iconic song lyrics, but the sentiments they represent don’t provide Guardian readers with anything resembling a serious prescription for solving the myriad of problems caused by Islamist extremism in the Middle East.
Adam Levick is the managing editor of CiF Watch, an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).