Friday, September 22nd | 2 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 7, 2015 12:39 am

How the Palestinian Authority Could Stop Obama’s Penchant for Internationalism

avatar by John Bolton

Email a copy of "How the Palestinian Authority Could Stop Obama’s Penchant for Internationalism" to a friend

The United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The Palestinian Authority is aggressively seeking to have itself declared a “state” by joining treaties and international organizations, thereby pressuring Israel and the United States to accept outcomes they long ago rejected.

In a fantasy that only seems sensible after years of incubating at the United Nations, the Palestinians believe they can create “facts on the ground” in the UN’s hallways, rather than on real ground in the Middle East.

While these disputes profoundly impact Israel and the region generally, they also have significant, often-unrecognized consequences for both America and the United Nations.

In their starkest form, they raise the question: Do the international organizations and treaty bodies prefer the active participation of the Palestinian Authority, or of the United States?

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

As 2014 ended, the Security Council narrowly rebuffed one PA effort to fix a time limit on negotiations with Israel over creating a Palestinian state under conditions that essentially resolve every disputed issue adversely to Israel.

The UN General Assembly had previously declared “Palestine” to be an “observer state” (a status nowhere found in the UN Charter), and UNESCO actually admitted “Palestine” as a member in October 2011.

The PA will likely renew its Security Council campaign early this year. The only remaining obstacle is the prospect that Washington will veto any such effort, as it always has before. The PA plainly hopes that President Obama’s hostility to Israel will allow a slightly modified version of the defeated resolution to pass.

In the meantime, the PA, pretending to be a “state,” claims to have acceded to a number of treaties, including the Statute of Rome, which created the International Criminal Court. In moving to join the ICC, the PA clearly envisions prosecutions of Israel for supposed war crimes, thus further undermining the Jewish state.

Indeed, the flip side of the campaign for UN-recognized Palestinian “statehood” is an assault on Israel’s legitimacy, as the “Zionism is racism” resolution once did.

For example, by continually raising the 1948 General Assembly Resolution 194 (the basis for Palestinian refugees’ alleged “right of return” to resettle in Israel), the PA invites the question of whether it really recognizes Israel’s right to exist.

Yet all of this will have dramatic consequences for the United States.

First, US law requires cutting off funding to UN agencies that admit the PA as a member state. (Congress first adopted this requirement following the PLO’s failed 1989-90 campaign to join UN specialized agencies.)

Thus, since UNESCO admitted the PA in 2011, Washington has withheld its UNESCO assessments. After two years of nonpayment, the United States lost its voting rights in 2013 pursuant to UNESCO’s Charter (as did Israel, which had also stopped funding).

On the other hand, since our assessed contribution was 22 percent of the agency’s budget, the loss of US funding was devastating to UNESCO. The Obama administration’s repeated efforts to weaken the legislative prohibitions have all failed.

The potential consequences for the entire UN system are enormous if PA memberships continue to grow. Many Americans already don’t want to be in the United Nations, or to pay our current assessment levels, and would welcome automatic defunding.

Even if Washington lost its UN General Assembly vote for nonpayment, it wouldn’t lose its vote — and veto — in the Security Council. America’s vote is written into the UN Charter, which can’t be amended unless (among other things) the United States itself consents.

As for the ICC, America is not a party. In my happiest moment of government service, I informed the United Nations that we were “unsigning” the Rome Statute.

And while the ICC thus faces no direct funding implications, the PA most definitely does. Under US law, America’s support to the PA (about $400 million a year) ceases if the PA presses to join the ICC.

On the other hand, ICC advocates have longed to persuade the Obama administration to reject the Bush position and re-sign the Rome Statute. But the Senate would then still have to ratify the treaty — and the chances of success there fall to zero if the PA becomes a party.

In short, these likely consequences of the PA’s efforts should spur the administration to intense efforts to prevent the Palestinians from marauding their way through the UN.

But who knows? The ultimate irony could well be that the obsessively multilateralist Obama administration winds up presiding over one of the greatest debacles for international organizations since the Senate rejected Woodrow Wilson’s Versailles Treaty.

And we’d have the Palestinian Authority to thank for it.

John Bolton is a former US ambassador to the United Nations. This article was originally published by The New York Post.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • charlie johnson

    The golfing parrot sees the world as a little white ball and himself as a giant with a big stick . His dream is to knock the little white ball around until it goes in a deep dark hole .So it is little wonder he has the glow of accomplishment when he raves about himself on TV.

  • Aron Simis

    The UN is a barely walking corpse. Like the defunct League of Nations it will vanish before 2020. Frankly, I don’t suppose the peace-pursuing nations will have much to regret about its extinction.

  • Yale

    Ambassador Bolton credits the Obama Administration with an ability and willingness to learn from its mistakes for which there is absolutely no evidence in the last six years.

    • D G BARRETT

      I did not see it that way. Bolton is very clear eyed about Obama intransigence. If Obama does anything to help pa, it would only be to hurt BB. But pa stupidity actually helping bb now.

  • zbrk

    “And we’d have the Palestinian Authority to thank for it.”

    Mr. Ambassador, and we have you to thank for this enlightening piece. Well reasoned, concise, and presented by one of the few people who was actually on the fields of this particular “battle.”

  • art

    abbas/pa/plo/hamas have clearly shown their complete rejection of all the US and Obama have tried to do. They have spit and s–t in the face of the US. They have also totally rejected Oslo, Wye, the Madrid conference,etc. The US has to stop turning a blind eye to the violations and terror of the pa. The US and Israel must stop being held hostage to the idea of Peace. abbas/pa/plo/hamas have played the US and Israel for fools and NEVER negotiated in good faith

  • Cheryl Rosenberg

    Would Obama be likely to support the PA’s push for statehood so that Hamas is sent a “signal” that the world prefers the PA over Hamas?

  • steven L

    We do not know what to expect from our Islamophile Pr. But he is trying his best to brake BB’s arm. IL cannot give i n no matter the cost.

Algemeiner.com