Wednesday, October 18th | 28 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 15, 2015 1:36 am

Oxford University Press Bans Pork Related Material From Books

avatar by Steven Emerson

Email a copy of "Oxford University Press Bans Pork Related Material From Books" to a friend

Koran cover. Photo: Wiki Commons.

Oxford University Press (OUP) has banned authors from depicting pork-related products in their children’s books in an apparent attempt to avoid offending Jews and Muslims, the Daily Mail reports.

The new prohibition came up during a conversation about free speech on Radio 4’s Today program and was referred to as “nonsensical political correctness.”

“I’ve got a letter here that was sent out by OUP to an author doing something for young people. Among the things prohibited in the text that was commissioned by OUP was the following: Pigs plus sausages, or anything else which could be perceived as pork,” said Radio 4’s Today presenter Jim Naughtie.

An OUP spokesman justified the new regulations.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

“Many of the educational materials we publish in the U.K. are sold in more than 150 countries, and as such they need to consider a range of cultural differences and sensitivities.”

However, these new measures have received considerable backlash from prominent figures.

Tory Member of Parliament (MP) Philip Davies stated that “no word is offensive. It is in the context in which it is used that is offensive … we have to to get a grip on this nonsensical political correctness.”

“That’s absolute utter nonsense. And when people go too far, that brings the whole discussion into disrepute,” agreed Muslim Labour MP Khalid Mahmood.

These new rules have serious implications for the freedom of speech, particularly in context of the recent deadly terrorist attacks in Paris initially targeting the satirical Charlie Hebdo publication.

“Jewish law prohibits eating pork, not the mention of the word, or the animal from which it derives,” said a spokesman for the Jewish Leadership Council.

This is not the first time that non-Muslims in Britain have attempted to self-censor in an effort to avoid actions they believed would offend Muslims. In 2007, organizers of a performance of a children’s play by Roald Dahl at a school in West Yorkshire originally removed the “Three Little Pigs” from the show, in favor of the “Three Little Puppies.” Councillors reversed that decision.

Likewise, two major banks in England in 2005 banned the use of piggy-banks in advertising or as gifts for children because of a perception that the banks would offend Muslims.

Steven Emerson is the Executive Director the Investigative Project on Terrorism (www.investigativeproject.org) where this article first appeared.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Julian Clovelley

    I got this article through the email with a warning from my internet service provider that it looks like spam…

  • BH in Iowa

    Soon they go after the Arkansas Razorbacks.

  • charlie johnson

    Is it not strange that this great institute of higher learning is censoring so many words in books?Before the USA became a nation by populating the continent of fleeing Christians and some Jews the great university was called ( along with another) to put together the first official Bible. We call a combination of old and new testiments,Just at a time when individuals were tortured for printing one themselves.Firstly.The Pope opposed this book,Secondly it was feared by the elites that the peons would learn to read and then place their loyalty on a higher plane than the Royals who controlled the minds of their slaves.The book burning culprits got their reputation from that era. So King James had his own reasons to put this Bible into print but it was done. Many persons have read the book. Many of the ignorant learned to read because of the book. There was more people not obligated to the Pope to find out what scriptures really said.From that point there was a radical change in the people of the world.The ordinary were given the opportunity to read and decide for themselves about the possible existence of a higher power without permission from some of the powerful elites. But now we see the great educators going backwards. The caveman syndrome . The preachers of ignorance.

  • charlie johnson

    So, You might guess the tracks will lead to banning the entire book Animal Farm by Orwell .( Pig and all) It would be considered offensive by the elite who produce our thoughts for us.

Algemeiner.com