Saturday, October 21st | 1 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 20, 2015 7:13 pm

In Defense of Europe’s So-called Far Right

avatar by Daniel Pipes

Email a copy of "In Defense of Europe’s So-called Far Right" to a friend

Dutch politician Geert Wilders. Photo: wiki commons.

Sunday a week ago, the French government sponsored a solidarity rally featuring an array of foreign leaders and all domestic political parties joining together in a “sacred union” (a term recalling World War I) against the massacres at Charlie Hebdo magazine and the kosher market.

Make that all the political parties except one — the National Front (NF) headed by Marine Le Pen, ostensibly excluded because it does not subscribe to “republican values.” In reality, it was barred because, uniquely among French political parties, it opposes immigration; and other politicians fear that the NF gains in the aftermath of the massacres. Likewise, the government yesterday forbade a demonstration by the secularist Riposte Laïque organization that called for “Islamists out.”

Although myself a classical liberal with libertarian tendencies, in the center of the Republican party in the United States, I welcome the strengthening of the National Front and many of the other parties vilified as being on the “far right.” Here is why:

Granted, some European parties actually have a fascistic quality, in particular Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungary. But the others being maligned are in fact populist and insurgent, often with leftist economic programs, especially concerning the welfare state. They are creatively centrist, forming a novel combination that draws on right and left in both their policies and their supporters. They represent the healthy, normal, legitimate, and constructive response of a people under stress. Moreover, they address what’s on many minds.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

For example, in the case of the latest atrocities, Le Pen was, as usual, the only French leader boldly to come out and identify their cause: “We are fighting an ideology, that of Islamist fundamentalism.” In contrast, President François Hollande blatantly lied: “Those who committed these acts, these fanatics, have nothing to do with the Muslim faith.” (His prime minister, Manuel Valls, did a bit better: “We make war … against radical Islam.”)

In addition to the NF in France, similar parties include the United Kingdom Independence Party, the Swiss People’s Party, the Freedom Party of Austria, Alternative for Germany, the Danish People’s Party, the Progress Party (Norway), the Sweden Democrats, the Finns Party, and – leading the pack – the Party for Freedom (Netherlands), founded by Geert Wilders, whom I consider to be Europe’s most important politician.

Two concerns top their agendas: the European Union and Islamism. The EU arouses negative responses for a variety of reasons – the British want out, the Germans want to spend less on others, the Greeks want less austerity: all feel oppressed by the supra-national experiment that began modestly in 1951 as the European Coal and Steel Community. Only EU bureaucrats and the well-off, buffered from the realities of everyday life, contend that things are just fine.

On Islamism, the response across Europe is unified. From Spain to Norway, one hears about too many immigrants, too much accommodation, too many social pathologies, too much Islamic supremacism, too much Shari’a (Islamic law), and too much violence. Increasing numbers of Europeans fear Islamism, grieve the loss of their traditional culture, and worry about their children’s future.

Legacy parties, the media, and academics engage in a campaign of denigration, marginalization, and ostracism against these parties to place them beyond the pale, as though they were the new Nazis. This is dangerous and futile. Dangerous because, denied acceptability and deference, members of these parties will be more likely to express themselves through extremism and violence. Futile because the numbers in this legion are inexorably on the rise. For example, the Sweden Democrats have doubled their support in each of the past four elections. Survey research finds Le Pen and Wilders leading the polls in their respective countries. As they continue to gain new adherents, many will before long have an important voice in European countries.

Rather than engage in name-calling and attempts at exclusion, established institutions should encourage the populist parties to moderate, become more sophisticated, and fully participate in the political process. Although these tend to be undisciplined, with some paranoid and unacceptable elements, they’re learning as they go, erratically becoming more reputable. Yes, many of them have dubious backgrounds – but so too do long-established parties in countries such as France and Sweden.

Whether welcome or not, the insurgents are coming. The future will be better for all concerned if they assume their expected role with the establishment’s cooperation, not vilification. They deserve courtesy and respect.

This article was originally published by the Washington Times.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Eric R.

    Daniel,

    That LePen, daughter of a Holocaust denier and who advocates bans on yarmulkes (to go with the hijab ban, even though Jews have done nothing wrong) is actually preferable to the present French political parties (which is sad but probably true), tells me not only how bleak and hopeless Europe is for Jews, but how truly f*cked Europe is (not that the latter point bothers me, though). Even Wilders, as I recall, wants to ban Shechitah.

    Farage is a good guy, though, and it is a shame that he gets lumped in with these others.

    Eventually, the nativist parties will come to violent blows with the Muslims, and the coming civil war in Europe will be bloody. Jews need to get out before then, as both sides will attack the Jews.

    Finally, what does it tell you about the state of European “democracy” when a Jew is safer walking the streets of Putin’s Moscow or war-torn Kiev than in supposedly “civilized” Western Europe?

    • Wilders-voter

      Yes, Wilders wants to ban barbaric practices of any religion. Religion is no justification for torturing animals, or mutilating children – girls or boys. If someone wants to live in Europe, he will have to be civilized and secular. There is no place for Bronze Age garbage here.

      • “If someone wants to live in Europe, he will have to be civilized and secular” Wilders-voter writes. Wheras the EU and its leadership are secular and atheistic the overwhelming majority of the Europeans are Christians as they are baptised as Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Anglicans, Lutherans and so on.
        It’s not very democratic though, that the European Christians accept to be governed & ruled by this atheistic secular minority in the EU-parliaments.

  • Mickey Oberman

    Thank you, Mr. Pipes.

    Perhaps this is the commencement of a sorely needed awakening.

    Let us hope so.

  • Carla Isselmann

    Yes, but poor Geert Wilders is again indicted by the dutch justicial leaders, the OM, because of ‘hate-mongering’ and they will do all they can to silence him!

Algemeiner.com