Friday, March 23rd | 7 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

January 26, 2015 1:11 pm

The New York Times Reports the ‘Ordinary Life’ of a Palestinian Terrorist

avatar by Jerold Auerbach

Email a copy of "The New York Times Reports the ‘Ordinary Life’ of a Palestinian Terrorist" to a friend
Office of The New York Times, in New York City. Photo: WikiCommons.

Office of The New York Times. Photo: Wiki Commons.

Even when New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief Jodi Rudoren is otherwise occupied, its coverage of Israel is worse than dismal; it is palpably distorted, if politely biased. Case in point: Isabel Kershner’s report (January 22) on the 23-year-old Palestinian whose knifing rampage on a Tel Aviv bus resulted in the stabbing of a dozen Israelis, several of whom are still hospitalized with serious wounds.

Terrorist assailant Hamza Matrouk, readers were informed, lived an “ordinary life” in a simple farming village in “the Israeli-occupied West Bank” (also known as biblical Judea and Samaria). Residents indicated that he was “quiet and introspective.” Yet “for young people and others in the village,” who were “angered by the war in Gaza” (now months ago) and by “recent tensions over the revered Aqsa Mosque” (tensions fomented by Palestinians on the Temple Mount, the holiest Jewish site), the knife-crazed assailant had become, predictably, “an instant hero.” As a neighbor declared: “We are proud of him. . . . Every Palestinian should be proud of him.”

Judging from her reporting, Ms. Kershner may also be proud of him. Matrouk must now be included among those individuals whose “spontaneity” is unencumbered by any organizational backing – as though Hamas, Hezbollah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Al-Aqsa Brigade, among others, provide insufficient inspiration for terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. He “was not considered an extremist” nor, Kirshner was informed, was he “known to be affiliated with any Palestinian political or militant faction.” He was just an ordinary 23-year-old, she reported, who found electrical work where he could and considerately helped his mother in her Ramallah clothing store.

Under arrest for his terrorist rampage, Matrouk cited the Gaza fighting, Al-Aqsa tensions, and “radical Islamic content on the Internet” as inspiration for his knife-slashing assault on innocent Israelis. To Ms. Kershner, however, his “story” has nothing to do with Palestinian or Islamic incitement and Hamas rocket attacks against Israelis: “it is one of dislocation in a conservative society.” But that may say more about her than about him.  To be sure, his parents are divorced; his mother and children lived in a refugee camp for six years before moving to the simple village of Al Jib, which Ms. Kershner takes pains to point out is within view of “the high-rises of a nearby Jewish settlement.”

Ms. Kershner compares Matrouk to another “recent assailant” (a.k.a attempted assassin), who tried to kill Rabbi Yehuda Glick for his temerity in advocating Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. Muataz Hijazi by name, he “also experienced a form of dislocation” after his family returned to Jerusalem from the United Arab Emirates. She concedes, however, that other Palestinian terrorists “had lived in the same houses since birth.” Unwittingly, she undercuts her own empathy for “dislocated” Palestinian assailants by including them with comfortably rooted terrorists.

Matrouk’s mother, she notes, “was careful not to condone her son’s act for fear of reprisal by the authorities, but she justified it.” It seemed so obvious, especially to a Times reporter in Jerusalem, when she explained: “All the Palestinian people are following what’s happening in Al Aqsa and Gaza, and he is one of the Palestinian people.” Ms. Kershner did not care to note that nothing is happening in Al Aqsa, except for Muslim prayer. And Gaza has been quiet for months, while Hamas doubtlessly prepares to dig more tunnels and rebuild its rocket supply. Matrouk was “said to be pious” and “prayed regularly at mosques.” And, his mother reported, “from a young age, we have always said we should do good things in order to go to paradise. In his opinion, this was a good thing.” Strange how paradise for Muslims is filled with murdered Jews.

End of story, at least for Isabel Kirshner. But for any thoughtful reader, hardly. Her abject embrace of Palestinian victimization is palpable. Her unwillingness to interview a single Israeli victim of Matrouk’s murderous assault is appalling. Her seeming inability to think critically, or write analytically, beyond a mother’s defense of her son is disgraceful. It is almost enough to make a reader yearn for Jodi Rudoren, who seems to be easing herself from Jerusalem coverage. If so, her torch has been passed to a worthy disciple.

Jerold S. Auerbach is a frequent contributor to The Algemeiner.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • E benAbuya

    Alas, the “Yellow Hag Rag”; formerly “The Gray Lady”

  • Leo Staschover

    Hold all that hysterical, negative comment! Something wrong here!

    Isabel Kershner’s son is in the IDF and, according to Wikipedia, has been widely accused of pro-Israel bias.

  • Ivan Gur-Arie

    What sort of crapare the Journalism schools graduating nowa days.?

  • BH in Iowa

    The same NYT that buried Shoah stories in the 1930s.

    Einmal nazi….. immer nazi.

  • Barry G

    The prerequisite of writing for the Times in the Middle East is being a useful idiot.

    Between them, Rudoren and Kirshner have yet to pen an objective piece showing the Palestinians as the authors of their own misfortune.

    It is ALWAYS about the Israeli occupation and aggression.

    Useful idiots indeed!!

    • Gene S in Scardale

      Right on Barry G and BH in Iowa

  • judithg

    why bother reading the nytimes. what could this anti-semitic piece of evil crap have to offer any normal person. worse yet, its stupid dolts are too lazy and ignorant to get their stories straight. budget considerations i suppose. of course, they could always get the stipend from their arab funders increased . all they have to do is lick a little harder. or is that, suck.

  • Pinchas Baram

    great critique by Prof. Auerbach of Isabel Kirshner’s kiss-ass approach to Palestinian terrorists. She is biassed beyond words, one more whore in the media.

  • nelson marans

    What can one expect from the biased New York Times? It is par for the course. If one wants accurate coverage choose the Wall Street Journal instead.

  • nelson marans

    What can one expect from The New York Times. It is par for the course and for accurate coverage one should choose the Wall Street Journal.

  • Kirshner is another Der Sturmer wannabe.

  • art

    T HE NYT and its mideast reporters are horribly immoral. They cowardly back and empathize with murderers and have helped define the new anti semitism and Jew hatred and are responsible, in part, for the murder of Jews.they empower the terrorists and assure more Jews will die

  • Mickey Segal

    The most outrageous part about this article is considering return of a Palestinian Arab from the Emirates to be a dislocation that justifies or explains terrorism. If that is the case, implementing a “right of return” widely would be expected to lead to a huge wave of terrorism against Israel by the newly dislocated. Is the NYT now arguing that the “right of return” would be suicidal for Israel? Do they not think through the implications of their claims, or do they just not care about the implications of their advice?