Thursday, September 21st | 1 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 27, 2015 3:41 pm

Anti-Semitism, Old and New

avatar by Irwin Cotler

Email a copy of "Anti-Semitism, Old and New" to a friend
Auschwitz Entrance. Photo: Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum.

Auschwitz Entrance. Photo: Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum.

This past week, I had the privilege of participating in the first-ever UN General Assembly forum on global anti-Semitism, which, as it happened, took place at a critical historical moment: the eve of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the most brutal extermination camp of the 20th century – and site of horrors too terrible to be believed, but not too terrible to have happened.

Of the 1.3 million people who died at Auschwitz, 1.1 million were Jews. Let there be no mistake about it: Jews died at Auschwitz because of anti-Semitism, but anti-Semitism did not die. And, tragically, as we have learned only too well, while it begins with Jews, it doesn’t end with Jews. In France and elsewhere, Jews are the canary in the mineshaft of evil.

The underlying thesis of my remarks at the UN was this: We are witnessing a new, sophisticated, global, virulent, and even lethal anti-Semitism, reminiscent of the atmospherics of the 1930s, and without parallel or precedent since the end of the Second World War.

This new anti-Jewishness overlaps with classical anti-Semitism but is distinguishable from it. It found early juridical, and even institutional, expression in the United Nations’ “Zionism is Racism” resolution – which, as the late U.S. Senator Daniel Moynihan said, “gave the abomination of anti-Semitism the appearance of international legal sanction” – but has gone dramatically beyond it. This new anti-Semitism almost needs a new vocabulary to define it; however, it can best be identified from an anti-discrimination, equality rights, and international law perspective.

Related coverage

September 20, 2017 4:35 pm
0

Does the President Have the Right to Expect Loyalty From his Attorney General?

This article was first published by Gatestone Institute. Recent news reports describe the president chastising his Attorney General Jeff Sessions for disloyalty. According...

In a word, classical or traditional anti-Semitism is the discrimination against, denial of, or assault upon, the rights of Jews as people to live as equal members of whatever society they inhabit. The new anti-Semitism involves the discrimination against, denial of, or assault upon, the right of the Jewish people to live as an equal member of the family of nations – or to live at all – with Israel emerging as the targeted collective Jew among the nations.

Observing the complex intersections between old and new anti-Semitism, and the impact of the new on the old, Per Ahlmark, Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, pithily and presciently concluded some 15 years ago: “Compared to most previous anti-Jewish outbreaks, this [new anti-Semitism] is often less directed against individual Jews. It primarily targets the collective Jews, the State of Israel. And then such attacks start a chain reaction of assaults on individual Jews and Jewish institutions … In the past, the most dangerous anti-Semites were those who wanted to make the world Judenrein, free of Jews. Today, the most dangerous anti-Semites might be those who want to make the world Judenstaatrein, ‘free of a Jewish state.'”

What has been called a pandemic of anti-Semitism is underpinned by four indicators.

The first indicator of the new anti-Semitism – and the most lethal manifestation of it – is what may be called genocidal anti-Semitism. This is not a term that I would use lightly or easily. I am referring here to the Genocide Convention’s prohibition against the direct and public incitement to genocide. Simply put, if anti-Semitism is the most enduring of hatreds, and genocide is the most horrific of crimes, then the convergence of the genocidal intent embodied in anti-Semitic ideology is the most toxic of combinations.

This genocidal anti-Semitism can be seen, for instance, in the state-sanctioned incitement to genocide of Khamenei’s Iran, a characterization I use to distinguish it from the people and public of Iran, who are otherwise the targets of Khamenei’s massive domestic repression.

It can be seen, as well, in the charters of such terrorist movements as Hamas and Hezbollah. Indeed, the Hamas charter not only calls for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews, wherever they may be, but also for the perpetration of acts of terror in furtherance of that objective. What is less well known – if known at all – is that the Hamas charter is replete with anti-Semitic tropes, including the notion that the Jews were responsible for the French revolution, the First World War, the Second World War, the League of Nations, the United Nations, and that no war has broken out anywhere without Jewish fingerprints on it.

Genocidal anti-Semitism can also be found in the religious fatwas, or execution writs, where genocidal calls in mosques and media are held out as religious obligations, where Jews and Judaism are characterized as perfidious enemies of Islam, and where Israel becomes, as it were, the Salman Rushdie of the nations.

Moreover, hate-filled demonstrations in Europe this past summer and since were replete with genocidal chants of “Jews, Jews to the gas,” accompanied by the firebombing of synagogues, attacks on Jewish community centres, and assaults on Jewishly identifiable people and places, all of which caused the President of Germany’s Central Council of Jews to remark:

“These are the worst times since the Nazi era. On the street, you heard things like, ‘the Jews should be gassed, the Jews should be burned.'”

Eight synagogues were firebombed in France in July alone, and there were attacks and threats to other French Jewish institutions long before the recent terrorist killing of four Jews in a kosher supermarket. Indeed, one suspects that had it not been for the terrorist assault on Charlie Hebdo two days earlier, the attack on the supermarket might have gone as unacknowledged as the ongoing threats and assaults in France these past years.

In short, Israel is the only state in the world and the Jewish people are the only people in the world today who are the objects of standing threats by governmental, terrorist, and radical religious groups, while in a cruel inversion of the Holocaust, Israel and Jews are themselves accused of genocide.

This brings me to the second indicator of the new anti-Semitism: the globalizing indictment of Israel and the Jewish people as the embodiment of all evil, including racism, imperialism, colonialism, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and even Nazism. And this serves as a validator for the third indicator, political anti-Semitism: the denial of fundamental rights to the Jewish people, and only to the Jewish people.

In other words, if genocidal anti-Semitism is a public call for or incitement to the destruction of Israel – and Israel and the Jewish people are the embodiment of all evil, warranting the assaults upon them – then political anti-Semitism is the denial of Israel’s right to exist to begin with, the denial of its legitimacy, or the denial of the Jewish people’s right to self-determination, if not even their denial as a people.

As Martin Luther King put it, political anti-Semitism constitues the “denial to the Jews of the same right, the right to self-determination, that we accord to African nations and to all other peoples of the globe.”

Which brings me to the fourth and final manifestation of anti-Semitism, and one that ought to be of particular concern to the United Nations: the laundering or masking of anti-Semitism under universal public values. This includes the laundering of Jew hatred under the protective cover of the UN, the authority of international law, the culture of human rights, and the struggle against racism.

The laundering of anti-Semitism under the protective cover of the United Nations found dramatic expression this past December, when the UN General Assembly – in yet another annual discriminatory ritual – adopted 20 resolutions of condemnation against Israel, and only four resolutions against the rest of the world combined.

This laundering of anti-Semitism under universal public values erodes the integrity of the UN, diminishes the authority of international law, corrupts the culture of human rights, and shames the real struggle against real racism.

As such, it has dramatic consequences not only for Jews but for everyone. Once again, and as always, it may begin with Jews, but it does not end there.

Irwin Cotler is a Member of the Canadian Parliament, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, and emeritus Professor of Law at McGill University in Montreal.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Rick K

    Mr.Pfaeffle has a fresh idea, that Arabs are not anti-semites. I suppose Hitler also was not an anti semite.

    Arabs love to hate.

    • While not all of Islam is filled with hatred, we remember that some are more evil than others. Some! No generalising!

  • Silvana kasinski

    Professor Irwin Cottler is z very intelligentsia man, witha a great knowkddge of 5000 thousand years os Jewish Antissemitism and what it means to our people, who even só have managed to survive. What frightens me the most is that Sweden recognizes two terrorist organizations,
    Hamas and Hezbollah as the state of palestine and now the European Eunion has followed suíte
    after the UN has horribly mixed up Sionism with terrorism.
    Where is the US an
    D Canada?

  • It is completely wrong approach to the problem of Israel and the Jews. The very wrong strategy of Israel and those who allegedly “defend” it is: they only try to defend themselves, while they need to attack. Attack those who spread in Internet all nasty things about Israel and Jews; attack UN for not accepting Israel; make stances about deportation of Arabs from Israel, because they have already their state: Jordan; they must blame lame Russia and Putin for continuing abuses of the Chechens, Tatar, Jews and others.They need to praise the power of Israel and say that it is not global hunt against Israel, but against Europe and European civilization,- and France is the most vulnerable, much more than Israel. This Tyrant Putin has big influence on the Muslim world (including of course Iran)in the Middle East and he is likely behind many terrorist attack on Israel (and even in France–Charlie Hebdo). But the grate mistake (even a crime)is that Israeli Foreign Minister (former Soviet citizen), Avigdor Liberman want to continue the friendship with Russia. Everything is upside down.

  • Joh. Pfaeffle

    ANTISEMITISM, IT IS THE JEWS WHO ARE THE ANTI SEMITES. THE PALESTINIAN ARABS ARE THE SEMITES NOT THE JEWS.

    • MO

      Screaming words from the rooftops (or in all caps on the internet)makes them neither true nor sensible. Mr. Pfaeffle is a self-proclaimed “self-employed historical revisionist”.
      https://www.linkedin.com/pub/johannes-pfaeffle/88/822/17a

      • herr pfaffffeee is confirming what the World knows of denial! No credibility herr pif!

    • Dante

      You are utterly wrong.
      1. The Jews (at least most of them) are Semites in the sense of descending from a Semitic people, although the non-Semitic medieval Chasars partly had adopted Judaism as well.
      2. You cannot be serious by accusing the whole Jewish people of what you understand by “antisemitism”.
      3. The word “antisemitism” is a euphemism coined by European 19th century Jew haters to make their own ideology sound more “scientific”. “Antisemite” is thus a synonyme for “Jew hater” (particularly those who hate the Jews as a people or “race”) and not for someone with an antipathy towards semitic language speakers – such as the Arabs. The Nazis even avoided the term “antisemitism” when the “Semite” Jerusalem Mufti and later SS Gruppenfuehrer (=Lt. General) Muhammad Amin al-Husseini stayed in Germany.

  • June Getraer

    Thank you to Irwin Cotler, a rational voice of clarity in a forum of dissonance.

  • Rebecca Camhi-Nachmia

    This is truly very frightening. As Jews we are not safe anywhere in the world except for Israel, and Israel is our only home; we must therefore all unite in order to defend it.

    • Riemoya

      There are still many supporting and praying for Israel and for the peace of Jerusalem on a daily basis. However, Israel and her people needs to be united and not at variance with each other for that is where the enemy will intensify its fiery darts!

    • A Jew is not much more safe in Israel. Under any circumstances Jews alone will have to Fight ever more vigorously to defend themselves. It is imperative that all nations defend their own people, whatever their Religious persuasion!

  • steven L

    A 2,000+ year old disease of the mind, certainly highly contagious and incurable.

  • Ivan Gur-Arie

    Is not the world grotesque? Is not the UN the international pimp of Anti Semitism? The Jewish people will survive, but the world is in decaying decline. History is a series of events that recur. When an inability to know right from wrong takes hold, then darkness will descend once again.Man makes history and man is responsible for the darkness.

Algemeiner.com