Saturday, March 17th | 1 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

February 13, 2015 10:32 am

Are You Defying God’s Will By Rejecting Measles Vaccination?

avatar by Bernard Starr

Email a copy of "Are You Defying God’s Will By Rejecting Measles Vaccination?" to a friend

A Torah scroll. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Many religious fundamentalists rationalize their rejection of measles (and other) vaccinations by claiming “We have faith in God, not man.” In his February 10, 2015, New York Times op-ed article arguing for measles vaccination, pediatrician Paul Offit writes: “It seems to me that if religion teaches us anything, it’s to care about our children, to keep them safe.” Fundamentalist vaccination deniers will wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Offit, but, unfortunately, will insist that safety comes from God, not man.

They maintain – despite frequent evidence to the contrary – that their faith will prevent or heal disease, that they don’t need or want scientific intervention. What’s more, they believe that if their faith does not succeed in healing or protecting their loved ones from illness, then this outcome is God’s will.

But do these beliefs mandate that they reject all scientific innovations? Does any religious scripture call for that? I don’t think so. Even if one could cherry-pick bible verses that could be interpreted to support these claims, there is an important overarching religious principle to consider. If one believes in the doctrine of creationism–that God created man–one should also embrace its corollary: that God’s creation of humans includes the manifestation of human intelligence to improve life on this planet. And indeed, we (including religious fundamentalists) have celebrated (and used) human advancements throughout history for bettering our lives. Rejecting those life-enhancing or life-saving contributions must then be seen as defying God’s will. Since most religious beliefs implicitly acknowledge that these life enhancing innovations emanated from God-given abilities, they shouldn’t be defied.

A popular parable graphically illustrates the consequences of such defiance. You may have heard it but it’s worth repeating. It illuminates this discussion.

As the story goes, there’s a raging flood in a town from days of torrential rains and the overflowing of a river. The water level is rising and people are fleeing, first by foot and auto. As the water level continues to rise, residents frantically enlist small rowboats and anything else that can float. One man, Jack, climbs to the roof of his house as the water reaches the first floor. A fundamentalist believer, he raises his arms and prays fervently to God to save him. A rescue worker passes in a rowboat and shouts to Jack, “Jump into the boat.” “No,” says Jack, ” I have faith. God will save me.” Then a helicopter drops life preservers to help people swim to safety. One lands right on Jack’s roof but he ignores it . “God will save me, he shouts.” Later, as the water continues to rise, threatening to engulf Jack’s roof, another helicopter hovers above and drops a rope. Jack waves the helicopter away, again declaring “God will save me.”

But alas, Jack drowns. When he reaches heaven and faces God he protests: “I’m a man of faith. I prayed and waited. Why didn’t you save me?” God answers: “I sent a boat, then a life preserver, and finally a helicopter. But you rejected all of them.”

So imagine a parent whose child dies from measles lamenting, “God, I had faith that you would protect my baby. Why did you take my child?” And God’s response: “I sent you the measles vaccine and you rejected it.”

The powerful message of the parable is that “miracles” are often manifested through God’s creations  intelligent humans – and the products of their God-given talents and abilities.

An orthodox rabbi once pointed out to me that God makes relatively few direct interventions in the Bible and that many miracles described in the Bible are performed by men and women who rise to tackle challenging circumstances. And that continues to be true today. People exercise divine abilities by tapping into their higher consciousness.

The story of Queen Esther is a good example of an “ordinary” biblical figure performing a miracle. According to the Old Testament (Torah) narrative, Esther miraculously saves the Jewish people from genocide by courageously defying protocol and enlisting the intervention of her husband, Persian King Ahasuerus (Xerxes l).

In modern times, among the many miraculous discoveries, innovations, and interventions, we have the miracles of modern medicine–including vaccinations that have saved millions of lives.

In the case of vaccinations developed by God’s creations, faith in man may also be an expression of faith in God – especially if you believe in creationism.

Bernard Starr, PhD, is a psychologist, journalist, and professor emeritus at the City University of New York, Brooklyn College. His latest book is“Jesus, Jews, and Anti-Semitism in Art: How Renaissance Art Erased Jesus’ Jewish Identity and How Today’s Artists Are Restoring It.” He is also author of “Escape Your Own Prison: Why We Need Spirituality and Psychology to be Truly Free.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Werner Strasser

    Sorry, but one cannot have it both ways, claiming we are the product of evolution and then stymieing it.

    Let the fittest survive. Measles would no longer be a threat if we had realized immunity via evolution.

    Immunization certainly works: It looks like that all those fabulous immunization are making us resistant to immunization?

  • Mimi

    It is disappointing to see this here, a show of blanket and blind acceptance of vaccinations and a unity with those whose vile behavior is akin to assault – both of these in the name of science as a god. All vaccines are equal in this scenario, because just as in the real world, there is no accountability on the part of the pharmaceutical companies or the medical professionals. Only the unlicensed and clearly unqualified are accountable. It might be worth considering the argument if only there were full accountability, not just abusive domination. The “defying God’s will” part is an eye-opener as well. Another show of abusive mentality, but there is a good point in there – and that is that those who believe life comes from and is maintained from medical science, and live that faith accordingly, have their god.

    • Bernard Starr

      “Blind acceptance”???? What on earth are you referring to? If the word blind applies at all its to blind rejection of vaccination There is massive evidence that vaccinations have—-and continue—to save millions of lives (see the link to the DAILY BEAST ARTICLE THAT I HAVE A HYPERLINK TO IN THE ARTICLE). There is no verified or credible evidence that vaccinations do harm. If you have such evidence please cite the specifics!!

  • z

    Vaccines = Vatican/CIA gov mafia bio-weapon against the “heretic” population

    Vaccines are laced with cancer causing viruses, heavy metals and other poisons that cause serious neurological damage, and death.

    Roman Catholics are “vaccine” exempt by the gov mafia, now why do you suppose that is?

  • Bernard Starr, undoubtedly there are many who are mistaken in their faith or its application in this world. I’m not now saying they are right or wrong about vaccinations in the context of faith, but let’s not make vaccinations a primarily religious issue.

    Dig into the other side of this debate and you may not come off as so sure of your position. There’s plenty of evidence proving your case isn’t nearly as sound as you think.

    Furthermore, if the abundance of evidence against vaccinations is accurate, and much is, you’ll find yourself responsible for many deaths and much suffering. Are you prepared to answer for it?

    You need facts; you need the truth, not propaganda and professional bias and partisanship. You are dealing with lives, not harmless theory and practice.

    • Bernard Starr

      I’m not making it a religious issue. I’m addressing those who have made it a religious issue and I’m showing that in some respects their religious rationale for rejecting vaccination undermines an overarching fundamental religious doctrine. Are you willing to take the responsibility for the millions who would undoubtedly would die if we abandoned vaccinations? And show me your “plenty of evidence.”