Thursday, September 21st | 1 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
March 2, 2015 3:50 pm

John Kerry: A Cossack in a Sukkeh

avatar by Edward Alexander

Email a copy of "John Kerry: A Cossack in a Sukkeh" to a friend

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (left) meets with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia on Jan. 5, 2014. Photo: U.S. Department of State.

John Kerry generally enters into diplomacy concerning Israel like a bull in a china shop; or, shall we say, like a Cossack in a sukkeh. (That is a simile that would have been familiar to Kerry’s Yiddish-speaking paternal grandparents, originally named Kohn.) It therefore came as no surprise when, in a nearly apopleptic outburst  to a congressional committee on February 25, he assailed Benjamin Netanyahu for having the temerity to accept an invitation from the U. S. Congress to warn of the imminent danger of allowing Iran to acquire the capacity to develop and the ability to “deliver” nuclear weapons, including Special Delivery to Israel.

Kerry alleged that Netanyahu (“the prime minister”) had already shown extremely bad judgment about the Middle East back in 2002 when “the prime minister was profoundly forward-leaning and outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq.” “And,” he snidely added, “you remember how that turned out.” Whether that invasion was wise or foolish, Kerry himself had made exactly the same judgment about it on October 11, 2002 when he voted (as he had also speechified) in favor of the invasion. “Bibi” did indeed in 2002 recommend “taking out” Saddam Hussein, though  whether he did it in “forward-leaning” position I couldn’t say. Of course Ariel Sharon was PM at that time, and Bibi had testified, publicly, as a private citizen. But one does not expect fine distinctions from people like Kerry, who first came to prominence in 1971 by accusing the entire American chain of military command of being “war criminals.”

Although it is an open secret that both the president and Mr. Kerry detest Netanyahu (who is a standing affront to their Brobdingnagian egos,  it was far more than personal hostility that Kerry was expressing here. Kerry takes his views of history from people who blame Israel for every misery on the planet except avian flu and would like to see not only the Democratic Party but America itself sever its traditional, value-laden bond with Israel in favor of an alliance, based on  realpolitik, with the fanatically Islamist regime of Iran. Here, for example, is Kerry in October 2014 blaming Israel for ISIL/ISIS: “As I went around and met with people in the course of our discussions about the  ISIL coalition, the truth is  there wasn’t a leader I met with in the region [Middle East] who didn’t raise with me spontaneously the need to try to get peace between Israel and the Palestinians, because it was a cause of recruitment and of street anger and agitation that they felt –and I see a lot of heads nodding –they had to respond to. And people need to understand the connection of that. And it has something to do with humiliation and denial and absence of dignity, and [the Islamic holiday] Eid celebrates the opposite of all of that.”

What lurks behind Kerry’s vituperative assault on Netanyahu is the world view of people like Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, who blame Israel for talking President Bush into that invasion (though even those two conspiracy theorists knew that Ariel Sharon, not Netanyahu, was PM at the time). But nothing could be further from the truth. In 2007 Lawrence Wilkerson, a member of the US State Department’s policy planning staff and later chief of staff for Secretary of State Colin Powell, said that “the Israelis were telling us Iraq is not the enemy—Iran is the enemy.” He added that a large number of  Israeli officials had told their American counterparts that “if you are going to destabilize the balance of power, do it against the main enemy, [and] not be distracted by Iraq and Saddam Hussein.” Wilkerson noted that these urgings of the Israeli officials were triggered by reports in December 2001 that the Bush administration was seriously planning an attack on Iraq. In the weeks preceding Sharon’s meeting with Bush on February 7, 2002, numerous Israeli officials told the Bush administration that Iran was a far greater threat to America and to everybody else than Iraq.

Related coverage

June 30, 2016 3:51 pm
6

Entebbe: Are We Heeding the Lessons?

July 4th marks the 40th anniversary of the rescue of Israeli hostages at Entebbe. Today we are surrounded by international terrorism....

Much as Kerry loathes Netanyahu, he dislikes Israel even more, and is committed to a détente with Iran that will “burnish” his master’s presidential legacy. Besides, having already declared that the ongoing  Syrian catastrophe (120,000 dead, 20 million refugees)  is a less dire calamity for the world than global warming,  he would take the reduction of Israel to sandy wastes by his Iranian friends with equanimity. For John Kerry a second Holocaust would be much less harmful to the globe than a conjectural increase of one tenth of a degree on the global thermometer.

Edward Alexander’s next book is Jews Against Themselves, forthcoming in spring from Transaction Publishers.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • why are you hiding Obama’s interview from your readers? He spoke for 20 minutes the day before Netanyahu and you are hiding it from klal yisroel

    TRANSCRIPT:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/02/us-usa-obama-transcript-idUSKBN0LY2J820150302

    VIDEO:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/02/us-usa-obama-idUSKBN0LY2GA20150302

    why do you feel the need to mislead klal yisroel by cherry picking primary sources to release to the klal? why not inform kal yisroel fully? why fear publishing the transcript and video of Obama’s full interview with Reuters conducted the day before Netanyahu spoke? Why hide info from the klal?

  • victoria brandeis

    AS FAR AS I SEE THERE ARE THREE LEADERS……BIBI, MERKEL AND PUTIN

    THE REST TRULY FIT IN WITH KOREAS ‘SPONGE BOB’……AND, A BRAIN SURGEON IS NOT NEEDED…..

    WEAKEST LINKS……AMERICA FRANCE ENGLAND SPAIN AND THE
    REST…….

  • martin

    Kerry the only guy to get a purple heart for a splinter in the butt

  • Reform School

    ‘Cossack in a Sukkeh?’ Maybe. Deleting the social service agency, preposition and article leaves a clever euphemism for his boss.

  • Edward Cohen

    ” Besides, having already declared that the ongoing Syrian catastrophe (120,000 dead, 20 million refugees)”
    The number of dead is estimated at well over 200,000. The number of refugees is estimated at around 3 million.

    • Edward Alexander

      Refugees from the Syrian calamity? Joseph Rago’s interview with General John Allen (WSJ, Dec. 2014), the U. S. Special Envoy in the war against ISIS, summed up Allen’s conclusions on this grim topic as follows:
      “There are some 20 million refugees fleeing Islamic State or the Syrian civil war.” (WSJ, Dec. 2014) Islamic State currently controls a third of Syria.

  • jb willikers

    Kerry is more an idiot in a China shop.

  • Yale

    The great irony of Kerry’s blaming Israel for the rise of ISIS is that ISIS is a Sunni response to the growing power of Iran and the Shi’ites in the Middle East. Obama/Kerry’s proposed detente with Iran will quickly become the prime recruiter for ISIS.

  • SPKTRUTH200

    This isn’t the first time BIBI did this stunt to an American president.He did it to Clinton too…and Kerry a 100% Zionist, obviously is sickened by the psychopath Bibi. LOL.

    • len

      sir you speak orwellian truth,you have eyes sir,but you refuse to see,you have ears sir,but you refuse to hear,Netanyahu responded to a request by Congress to address the legislative branch of the american government about a matter that Israel is well informed about.unlike our american president who thinks he was elected king,congress was doing its duty as a seperate branch of government to get the facts and as much knowlege on the iranian danger that it possibly can as is its duty.if this irks you sir this is your problem.after listening to the israeli prime minister i think he is quite grounded in his sanity,understanding and clarity in informing this legislative body, something we could use a little more of these days in washington.no sir ,no matter how hard you and your ilk try to besmirch this churchillian figure of the 21rst century it will only make you look more foolish.your emperor sir ,it seems,has no clothes!!

      • Michael

        You might be interested to know that Netanyahoo engineered his own “invitation” to speak to Congress. He demonized our President for the dumb Republicans, who never saw a Jewish political donor they did not like.

Algemeiner.com