Monday, October 16th | 26 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
March 3, 2015 12:49 am

Obama’s Self-Professed ‘Confusion’ About Islamic Terror

avatar by Raymond Ibrahim

Email a copy of "Obama’s Self-Professed ‘Confusion’ About Islamic Terror" to a friend

Earlier this month, Obama tried to shield Islam from criticism by depicting Christianity as equally violent and intolerant. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

During the National Prayer Breakfast earlier this month, US President Obama tried to shield Islam from criticism by depicting Christianity as equally violent and intolerant (via comments about crusades, inquisitions, and “high horses”).  Much lesser known is that he also tried to shield Islam by invoking Christian virtues.

In many ways, his comments on “humility” might be the strangest of his entire speech—to the point that Obama himself got visibly confused by his own lack of coherency and even admitted it.

The transcript of the portion in question follows, interspersed with my comments and observations.

Said Obama:

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

So this [Islamic State type violence] is not unique to one group or one religion.  There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.  In today’s world, when hate groups have their own Twitter accounts and bigotry can fester in hidden places in cyberspace, it can be even harder to counteract such intolerance. But God compels us to try.  And in this mission, I believe there are a few principles that can guide us, particularly those of us who profess to believe.

Two important points here to establish context for what follows: 1) Obama is referring to the atrocities being committed by the Islamic State—the beheadings, crucifixions, rape slavery, immolations—which he claims are common to all religions; 2) By invoking “God” and offering principles to “those of us who profess to believe”—a phrase he really stresses in the video—Obama is clearly addressing American Christians in particular.

Continues Obama:

And, first, we should start with some basic humility.  I believe that the starting point of faith is some doubt—not being so full of yourself and so confident that you are right and that God speaks only to us, and doesn’t speak to others, that God only cares about us and doesn’t care about others, that somehow we alone are in possession of the truth.

These are surely some strange remarks in the context of this speech. Obama calls on Americans in general Christians in particular to exercise some “humility” and “doubt”—and he treats the two as interchangeable in meaning, which they most certainly are not.

Humility, of course, is a well-recognized Christian virtue.  It is the exact opposite of pride; a modest if not humble opinion of oneself, one’s shortcomings.   But what does that—exercising humility—have to do with our understanding of Islamic violence and terrorism, which is, after all, the topic under discussion?  Are we not to judge and condemn it—since we’re apparently no better; is this just a reiteration of the president’s “high horse” comment earlier?

Furthermore, while Christian humility encourages self-doubt, it does not encourage doubt concerning right and wrong, good and evil.  The same Christ who advocated humility repeatedly condemned evil behavior and called on people to repent of their sins.

Finally, what exactly are we supposed to “doubt”—that the Islamic State is evil?  That they too “are in possession of the truth”?

Due to the incoherency of this speech, Obama himself eventually crashed on his own words and was left dumbfounded for a few seconds—six long and awkward seconds to be precise:

Our job is not to ask that God respond to our notion of truth—our job is to be true to Him, His word, and His commandments.  And we should assume humbly that [six-second pause] … we’re confused and don’t always know what we’re doing …

Be sure to watch the video (around the 11-minute mark) where it is clear that Obama’s own contradictory comments cause him to pause for an inordinate amount of time before he concludes that “we’re confused”—apparently a subconscious reference to his administration.

If Obama truly believed that “our job is to be true to Him, His word, and His commandments”—and assuming “He” is God of the Bible, not Allah of the Koran—then he would be speaking truth, calling a spade a spade, and coming to the aid of those countless innocents being slaughtered, raped, and enslaved by the Islamic State and in the name of Islam—just as the Crusades did one-thousand years ago (only to be demonized today, including by Obama).

In short, just as the American president misrepresented episodes from Christian history to exonerate Islamic terror during the National Prayer Breakfast, so too did he misrepresent Christian virtues like humility to create doubt and moral confusion concerning Islamic terror.

And in the end, it was he—the president of the United States—who was left confused by his own nonsensical platitudes.

Raymond Ibrahim is author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians.  A Mideast and Islam specialist, he is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an associate fellow at the Middle East Forum, and a Hoover Institution Media Fellow, 2013.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Dante

    Sorry, I did not see my first comment.

  • Dante

    Thank God that in the 1940’s, the US president was Roosevelt and not Obama!

  • Iran Rejects Obama’s Call for 10-Year Nuclear Freeze

  • Dante

    Thanks to God that the 1941’s America had a president Roosevelt and not Obama! His. “humility” and “doubt” would have rendered Europe either National Socialist or Stalinist and Asia under Japan’s Faschists and rapists.

Algemeiner.com