Friday, March 23rd | 7 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

March 9, 2015 11:24 am

The Grandeur of Western Illusions

avatar by Ruthie Blum

Email a copy of "The Grandeur of Western Illusions" to a friend

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Photo: via Wikimedia Commons.

This week, a photo of a dress went viral on the Internet, with people from all corners of the globe expressing an opinion about it. The article of clothing in question is nothing special, though its fame has made it a hot commodity on the market. No, what is causing this particular “fashion” sensation is the fact that the garment’s colors are a matter of controversy. Indeed, viewers of its picture are sharply divided between those who see stripes of gold lace on white fabric, and those who see them as black and blue. I am among the former.

As it happens, the actual dress, according to its designer and subsequent photos taken in a different light, prove the latter to be correct. But, even after knowing this, neither I nor others in the gold-and-white camp are capable of seeing the item’s true colors for what they are.

Explanations for this, too, have been circulating since the onset of the color war. The discrepancy apparently has to do with a trick the brain plays on the optic nerve of part of the population, under certain conditions — or something to that effect.

Confronted with such a phenomenon, one cannot help but be reminded of the saying: “Who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?”

This slightly bastardized line from the Marx Brothers movie “Duck Soup” is an ironic way of saying that facts shouldn’t get in the way of what someone is told to believe, no matter how obviously false.

Where the colors of the dress are concerned, the situation is reversed: Our eyes really are deceiving us. And once it was demonstrated to me beyond a doubt that the colors are not as I had initially imagined, I immediately changed my position. Due to an optical illusion, I still may not be able see that the dress as blue and black, but I now know that it is. So I no longer believe my own eyes. Instead, I rely on the facts to set me straight. Like a pilot experiencing vertigo, I must put my faith in the accuracy of the instruments in the cockpit.

The same policy should be applied to historical and current events: One should trust what he sees, unless provided proof that what he thinks he is witnessing is an illusion. But, of course, this would force many individuals and groups to abandon either what they have been taught to think or what they have been viewing in the wrong light.

The issue of reality versus the perception of reality is one that has captivated philosophers, religious thinkers and mystics throughout the ages. More recently, however, it has come to be used as superficial rhetorical tool in political discourse and debate. The idea that there is no such thing as truth — that there are only subjective perspectives and narratives — has gained popularity and momentum, particularly among Western liberals. It is a comfortable concept for the Left to espouse, especially when engaged in defending otherwise indefensible behavior on easily refutable grounds.

The Nazis and the Soviets knew how to use this form of “useful idiocy” to their advantage. But their propaganda machines paled in comparison to that which the Islamists have at their disposal today.

Yes, the Web allows them endless access to hearts and minds, through virtually infinite eyes. It is thus that Islamic State’s Jihadi John can perform gruesome decapitations for all to behold, while simultaneously accusing the United States and Britain of brutality, and receive the benefit of the doubt about his motives from the White House. It is thus, too, that Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei can announce on YouTube and Twitter that Israel will be annihilated by his nuclear bombs, while his puppet Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is in Vienna assuring Secretary of State John Kerry that Iran’s nuclear program is “peaceful.”

It is understandable for people who enjoy freedom and democracy to have difficulty grasping that their condition is not to be taken for granted.

It might even make sense for such people to assume that anyone who deviates from this seemingly natural state of affairs must have been driven to dastardly deeds by those more fortunate than he. Too bad it’s not true, because if it were, all crime could be eradicated by social work, and military aggression, handled through diplomacy, would be a thing of the past by now, not the tsunami of the present and wave of the future.

Brain tricks that make black look like gold are entertaining. Those that have been leading the West to see light where there is darkness are putting us all in great peril.

Ruthie Blum is the editor of Voice of Israel radio ( This article was originally published by Israel Hayom.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Julian Clovelley

    Unfortunately it is often those who most criticise the projection of falsehood as reality who are the most reluctant to dispense with their own delusions

    To understand what is happening to the mentality of people it is sometimes helpful to treat the religious view as one entity, and not as several independent and separate ones. The religious view creates a self perpetuating “Scheinwelt” – a parallel reality ,that without closer scrutiny seems to explain the world we perceive through our senses. The religious view is shaped to fit the host or target culture, making for example saints out of a pantheon of gods, that can intercede in the same manner as the ancient gods – and incorporating festivals into its own structures – for example the Saturnalia became “Christmas”

    The religious view seeks to provide bogus non scientific explanations, because rational science and properly researched history and archeology negate religious belief. Thus evolution is countered by “Creationism” and when that flags Creationism is remoulded to form “Intelligent Design” a concept as idiotic as explaining Gravity with “Intelligent Falling”

    Religions rely on bringing people up from babyhood in a myth-based Scheinwelt. It begins with various rites such as lopping off the foreskin or “christening” with water. Nothing really actually happens except the strengthening of irrationality through the use of ritual. The mental assassination of intellect continues through superstitions related to dietary laws, and a plethora of “essential” rituals, festivals and holidays – and the outpouring, on a huge scale, of pious bosh.

    Not satisfied with decrying science, religion turns itself to the faculty of medicine with a pattern of inane spells and faith healing. Mental illness it deals with through belief in, and exorcism of, spiritual entities. And then there is history. Religions base themselves on ridiculous myths that run counter to the knowledge accrued by historical research – inventing as the tool of irrationality, the concept of faith as belief in things unseen – and applauding that irrationality as spiritual purity.

    Lets get real with Judaism – which contains beliefs common to Christianity – Not one shred of the Torah is historically accurate. But somehow most Jews, and most Christians, do not seem responsible enough to openly admit that the entire book of Genesis is a fabrication comprised of largely pre-existing legends, and assembled sometime around the eighth century BCE or later. They maintain the delusion that the Exodus was a real event – Moses a real person not dissimilar to his Torah portrayal. Most Christians still do not grasp that the New Testament is largely myth – beginning with the ridiculous nativity story and ending with the ludicrous concept of the Atonement – and of “original sin”

    One can project all of this into the religious view in other religions, with their own dress codes, rituals, and dietary codes, their own gods and prophets and their own mythologies and “theologies” supplanting logical thought and real history
    I am all for breaking out of this nightmare Scheinwelt of delusion – which to me does not even impinge on the question of the reality of transcendence or divinity. Our existing religions set us up from childhood for irrational behaviour, gullibility, and academic and intellectual – as well as cognitive psychic and spiritual backwardness.

    But if we want to change this – it is no good pointing to the flaws in another religious culture, because these are in fact part of a continuum that includes our own delusions. Change in this continuum starts closest to home, in your own delusions, your own favoured religious view, whatever form it may take. Fundamentalism, irrationality displacement from reality and the racism and prejudice and cultural fear and hatred that often accompany them are all diseases of the religious view – whatever label you put on it

    Including “Zionism”