Wednesday, May 24th | 28 Iyyar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 20, 2015 8:03 am

Why Won’t the Government Admit Tennessee Shooting Was Islamic Terrorism?

avatar by Steven Emerson

Email a copy of "Why Won’t the Government Admit Tennessee Shooting Was Islamic Terrorism?" to a friend
Tennessee killer Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. Photo: screen caption.

Tennessee killer Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. Photo: screen caption.

Dylann Roof and Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez have a lot in common.

Their terrorism shocked the nation, creating a uniform sense of profound sadness, pain, and confusion. Both young men thought they were justified in arming themselves to the teeth and trying to slaughter as many of their fellow Americans as possible. This, they believed, would advance their individual causes.

For Roof, that cause was white supremacy. He took nine innocent lives inside a church because they were black.

Related coverage

September 19, 2016 6:32 am
0

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

JNS.org - Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. “The...

The FBI says it still is trying to determine precisely what Abdulazeez thought he was doing. Investigators reportedly are trying to learn more about a months-long visit Abdulazeez made to Jordan last year.

Reports indicate that law enforcement has found no evidence he acted in concert with anyone else. But his murder of four U.S. Marines in Chattanooga Thursday came in the culminating days of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month, which Islamic State terrorists have used to call for waves of attacks on just about anyone, anywhere.

“Muslims everywhere, we congratulate you over the arrival of the holy month,” ISIS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani said in a recording last month. “Be keen to conquer in this holy month and to become exposed to martyrdom.”

In a blog he posted just three days before the attack, Abdulazeez wrote about the companions of Islam’s prophet Muhammad, “Every one of them fought Jihad for the sake of Allah,” he wrote. “Every one of them had to make sacrifices in their lives.”

Because Abdulazeez targeted a military recruiting center and training facility, the obvious question is whether he was inspired by the Islamic State (ISIS) or other jihadist groups. The President ordered security bolstered at Defense Department facilities in case other people planned similar terrorist attacks.

Roof’s terrorist attack at Charleston, South Carolina’s historic Emmanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church last month focused attention on the violent threat from other domestic sources, racists, anti-government “sovereign citizens,” and others. A New York Times story focused on researchers who believe that threat has been underestimated while the threat from radical jihadists “has been overblown.”

That assertion seems more difficult to support today.

Since May 1, we have seen the following: two heavily-armed gunmen die as they tried to storm a contest involving cartoons depicting Muhammad. Boston police and the FBI shot and killed Usaama Rahim after Rahim lunged at them with a military knife. Earlier, authorities heard Rahim tell an associate he was “going to ah go after them, those boys in blue.” Rahim also “liked” ISIS on his Facebook page and published other statements embracing radical Islam and jihad.

FBI Director James Comey says arrests in several other cases likely prevented attacks around Independence Day weekend. Now we have Abdulazeez. His death toll might have been higher if not for the swift, effective response of local law enforcement in Tennessee.

An overblown threat?

The Times story cites data from the New America Foundation indicating that, since September 12, 2001, “nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims.”

That’s a convenient starting date. And the data can be influenced by factors ranging from effective law enforcement interdicting plots before they become attacks to simple, dumb luck.

If Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had one more accomplice, if would-be Times Square Faisal Shahzad or underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had just a little more sophistication, had organizers of thatMuhammad cartoon contest in Garland scrimped on security costs, that death toll might quickly flip in favor of killings by Islamists.

Would watchdogs of racist/anti-government terror accept arguments that their threat is somehow overblown? Of course not. It is a macabre race for supremacy that benefits no one. Both are real threats. Law enforcement should take each seriously.

Abdulazeez’s attack fits a pattern of other Islamist terror strikes, attempted and successful, in the United States. In 2009, Nidal Hasan murdered 13 people, mostly his fellow soldiers, at Fort Hood after getting the blessing of American-born al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. That same year, Carlos Bledsoe converted to Islam and appears to have been radicalized in Yemen before he opened fire on a Little Rock army recruiting office, killing Army Pvt. William Long and wounding Army Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula.

Two years later, Naser Jason Abdo was arrested with explosive materials and weapons at a Texas motel near Fort Hood. He planned to detonate a bomb outside a restaurant popular with base personnel, and then shoot as many survivors as possible.

He was stopped thanks to an alert gun store clerk who called police. When his distraught mother asked why he did it, Abdo explained: “The reason is religion, Mom.”

As a Muslim, he said he had to do something in response to American military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. “When bad things are happening,” he said, “you have to do something about it.”

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev offered a similar justification for the Boston Marathon bombing, scrawling a note as he hid from police, writing: “The U.S. Government is killing our innocent civilians … I can’t stand to see such evil go unpunished, we Muslims are one body, you hurt one you hurt us all, well at least that’s how Muhammad (pbuh) wanted it.”

ISIS claimed responsibility for the failed Garland, Texas, shooting. Reports indicate that gunman Elton Simpson may have been in communication with ISIS recruiters or supporters before driving from his Arizona home with Nadir Soofi to Texas, dreaming of slaughtering as many people as they could.

In short, if there are fewer American dead from Islamic jihadists than from American racists and anti-government fanatics, it is not because the threat doesn’t exist or somehow is exaggerated.

Saying the Islamist threat is potentially greater in no way diminishes the horror Dylann Roof unleashed at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. And it should not be seen as an argument that law enforcement should ignore the threats posed by white supremacists, “sovereign citizen” adherents who believe they are outside legal jurisdiction, or other violent anti-government ideologies.

Roof hated black people, believing they “raped our women, and … are taking over the country.” But thus far, law enforcement has not identified any organized movement that urged him to kill. There seems to be no communication with racist leaders who actively tried to help him carry out the slaughter.

For susceptible Muslims, those messages are ubiquitous, dating back to Awlaki and al-Qaeda, and updated daily by ISIS. Yet, despite the best efforts of law enforcement, reports indicate Abdulazeez was unknown to the FBI before he started shooting Thursday.

An overblown threat? It was all too real for Gunnery Sgt. Thomas J. Sullivan, Staff Sgt. David A. Wyatt, Sgt. Carson Holmquist, and Skip Wells, not to mention their grieving families and friends.

Please, advocates of this claim, tell us how many dead Americans it will take before we reach the threshold of a legitimate threat.

Steven Emerson is the Executive Director the Investigative Project on Terrorism (www.investigativeproject.org) where this article first appeared.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • judorebbe

    The Fort Hood murders were merely a case of “workplace violence”.
    The Chattanooga murders are merely a case of “drive-by-the-workplace violence”.

Algemeiner.com