Tuesday, January 19th | 6 Shevat 5781

October 22, 2015 2:37 pm

Former State Department Official Says Nuclear Deal Will Not Moderate Iran

avatar by David Daoud

Former State Department official David Aaron Miller (pictured) said that there were no signs that Iran intended to moderate after the signing of the nuclear deal. PHOTO: Wikipedia.

Former State Department official Aaron David Miller. Photo: Wikipedia.

A former U.S. State Department official who served as an adviser on Arab-Israeli negotiations explained why he believes Iran will not moderate its stance after the nuclear deal is implemented in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday

Aaron David Miller, an author and Middle East analyst, began by asserting that Iranian moderation after a nuclear deal “was always a long-term bet,” and that it was “clear now…that the Islamic Republic [of Iran] regime is not moderating its repressive and authoritarian character but consolidating it.”

Evidence of this, wrote Miller, was Iran’s increasing involvement in Syria, now alongside Russian forces.

“Qassem Soleimani, head of the Revolutionary Guards al-Quds force, is personally directing a coordinated effort with Russia, the [Assad] regime, Hezbollah and pro-Iranian Iraqi Shia militias,” wrote Miller, noting that the, “Iran, Russia, Assad alliance is a new and likely enduring Middle East reality.”

Related coverage

January 19, 2021 12:07 pm

Analysis: Saudi Overtures to Wary Biden Team Driven by Worries Over Iran, Economy

After months out of the global spotlight, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has swept back to centre stage with...

Further proof, according to Miller, is Iran’s recent test of the Emad (Pillar) guided long-range ballistic missile, which could potentially carry a nuclear warhead.

Miller claimed that the test, which may have already violated the JCPOA and U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, demonstrated Iran’s determination to upgrade its military capacity, thus increasing its “ability to throw its weight around the region,” which is “hardly an encouraging sign of moderate predispositions.”

Moreover, Miller posited, even Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s approval of the JCPOA was an attempt to “consolidate the revolution and not weaken it.” By securing the removal of sanctions, and thus raising the standard of living of Iranians, Khameni’s consent to the deal was intended to “ensure regime longevity,” and not to moderate its policies.

Based on these facts, the potential for a fundamental change in the regime is “scant indeed.” Even the possibility of Iran opening up economically does not mean the regime would loosen its authoritarian and repressive nature, wrote Miller, as the past examples of China, Vietnam the former Soviet Union and Cuba have demonstrated.

Miller ended on a pessimistic note, concluding, “Anyone who thinks Iran is on a linear course to moderation ought to lay down until the feeling passes.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.