Sunday, March 18th | 2 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

November 22, 2015 7:44 pm

Media Watchdog Seeks to Stack Lecture by ‘Blatantly Biased’ New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief

avatar by Ruthie Blum

Email a copy of "Media Watchdog Seeks to Stack Lecture by ‘Blatantly Biased’ New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief" to a friend
A CAMERA-sponsored billboard on a New York City building, part of an ongoing campaign to criticize The New York Times' Israel coverage. Photo: CAMERA.

A CAMERA-sponsored billboard on a New York City building, part of an ongoing campaign to criticize The New York Times’ Israel coverage. Photo: CAMERA.

Earlier this month, the Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) sent out a letter urging supporters to attend a November 30 event at which New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief Jodi Rudoren will be speaking.

As one of the Times’ key critics, CAMERA regularly lambastes the paper’s coverage of Israel-related issues, especially those involving the conflict with the Palestinians. The media monitor often highlights Rudoren’s articles in particular, citing examples of what it deems to be her blatant bias and severely imbalanced journalism.

The CAMERA letter reads:

The New York Times continues to display a troubling anti-Israel bias which has been the subject of a number of CAMERA studies and publications. Current Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief Jodi Rudoren perpetuates this pattern, having shown herself to be an advocacy journalist, presenting a slanted narrative rather than objective coverage. CAMERA has documented and analyzed much of her reporting, including on the recent wave of terror attacks against Israelis.

On Monday, November 30, Rudoren will appear at the JCC on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. As part of “The Israel Forum” at the JCC, Rudoren will speak at an event titled, “Report from the Ground: Is this a Third Intifada?”

Please make every effort to attend the event. Rudoren and Times editors must be made aware that readers do not appreciate slanted coverage that characterizes terrorists as innocent victims — even “Boy Scouts” — and ignores the real victims: Israeli children, senior citizens, soldiers, civilians, police, even the reputation and legitimacy of the Jewish state. Be there and speak for them.

CAMERA Director Andrea Levin told The Algemeiner what she would like to see from people taking her advice and being part of the audience at Rudoren’s talk.

“A lot of readers are very unhappy with The Times, with the anti-Israel bias that permeates coverage,” she said. “The JCC event is an opportunity to hear the Jerusalem bureau chief first hand and ask questions. The overarching Times problem, in CAMERA’s view, is its failure to report honestly and fully the aggression against Israel, including the lurid incitement against Israel and Jews that fuels violence and blocks hope of peaceful coexistence.”

Levin continued: “Attendees might ask Ms. Rudoren why, for instance, she recently wrote that a 20-year-old Palestinian caught on video charging Israelis with a knife in his upraised hand was, in her words, a teenager with a ‘boy scout’-type knife. It was actually a balisong, banned in many countries as a weapon. What prompts a reporter in the midst of a campaign of stabbings to insert ‘boy scout’ about a perpetrator — to think ‘boy scout’ — with all its wholesome connotations? The Times correspondent has a chance to explain at the JCC — and the public can weigh the answer to this and lots of other questions.”

Levin told The Algemeiner that, as of last week, the event was completely sold out.

“I’m hoping at least some of those tickets were purchased by people who intend to ask challenging questions,” she said.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Florres

    Why is Algemeiner pretending that the NYT is not absolute evil incarnate?

    The NYT time is the most corrupt period of the Catholic Church incarnate.

  • Arthur

    Why is attempted to have some pro-accuracy voices in the audience “stacking”? CAMERA is not seeking to create a walk-out or otherwise deny Ms. Rudoren her right to speak, as has happened to so many Israeli speakers (and particularly to so many pro-Israel speakers). Looking at CAMERA’s letter and what CAMERA Director Andrea Levin says in the article, it seems that they are only seeking to have an audience that is informed enough about the issues to press Ms. Rudoren on some of the more questionable aspects of her reporting, a clear example of which is provided. This is what we want to see in a free society, where the open debate of ideas is meant to be a defense against the misinformation that often is used to inspire hatred.

  • Herb Glatter

    from my experience, the audience at this venue will be applauding Rudoren and the New York Slimes. occasionally i wander over to her FB page. she will reply to a comment when it points out the bias in her articles as have been articulated here and vociferously defend her work.