Monday, July 23rd | 11 Av 5778

February 12, 2016 3:43 am

An Opposing View to Netanyahu’s Proposed Security Wall

avatar by Alon Ben-Meir

Email a copy of "An Opposing View to Netanyahu’s Proposed Security Wall" to a friend
PM Benjamin Netanyahu walks with IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkott along Israel's border fence. Photo: Twitter.

PM Benjamin Netanyahu walks with IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkott along Israel’s border fence. Photo: Twitter.

The demagoguery of Prime Minster Netanyahu seems to have no limit — demagoguery in a sense that he says and acts on anything to buttress Israel’s hold on the West Bank in the name of national security. This time around, Netanyahu came up with another absurd idea, proposing a “multi-year plan to surround Israel with security fences to protect ourselves in the current and projected Middle East.”

Netanyahu went on to say that: “In our neighborhood, we need to protect ourselves from wild beasts.” Knowing Netanyahu and his sentiment toward the Palestinians, using inflammatory language is customary for him, as he views every Palestinian as a would-be beastly terrorist.

It is obvious from everything we know that the purpose of building such a fence, which runs through a significant portion of Palestinian territory, is to make the expropriation of Palestinian land permanent.

At the same time, he continues to expand settlements in the West Bank and more than likely will build new ones while providing more than 10,000 soldiers to protect the settlers, ensuring that Palestinians will never establish (under his watch) their own state; of course, all of this is in the name of national security.

Netanyahu knows only too well that no fence, however high and regardless of the material it is made of, will prevent a determined terrorist from finding a way to penetrate it.

True, he will introduce the newest technology to detect any attempt to pierce through the wall; however, he seems to ignore the fact that Palestinian militants have perfected the art of building tunnels through which insurgents can still wage attacks on Israeli civilians or military personnel, even at the expense of getting killed in the process.

Netanyahu himself raised the question of the tunnels, stating: “If you’re thinking of erecting a fence there you have to take into account that they could tunnel underneath it. The people who said that there is no significance to [retaining] territory in the modern age should go to Gaza.”

Let us go to Gaza then; what do we find? Hamas has been able to build scores of tunnels underneath the fence that separates Gaza from Israel, and have successfully been able to go through the tunnels and attack Israeli forces and civilians.

Although Israeli forces found many of these tunnels during Operation Protective Edge in July 2014 and destroyed the majority of them, Hamas is now at work building new tunnels, knowing that no matter what security measures Israel takes, it will not find all the tunnels. Hamas is still in a position, should they chose to do so, to cross the fences from underneath.

Netanyahu also seems to ignore the fact that no fence, however sophisticated it may be, can stop rockets from being fired at Israel. During that same operation, Hamas was able to launch more than 3,000 rockets, which reached much of Israel’s urban areas and caused tremendous havoc.

True, most of these rockets were intercepted; however, it was not the fence that intercepted them but the Iron Dome air defense system, demonstrating the ineffectiveness of the separation wall.

Netanyahu appears to ignore another reality in northern Israel along the Lebanese border, where Hezbollah is in possession of tens of thousands of short and medium range advanced rockets that can reach just about every part of Israel. What kind of fence, one might ask, does Netanyahu have in mind to stop Hezbollah from firing dozens of such rockets simultaneously?

Of course, Netanyahu conveniently did not talk about Hezbollah in Lebanon, because he has no plans to occupy any part of Lebanon.

In reaction to Netanyahu’s plans to build a wall that encircles Israel, one of his main coalition partners, Education Minister Naftali Bennett, who is far more to the right than even Netanyahu, stated “The prime minister spoke today about how fences are needed. We are wrapping ourselves in fences. In Australia and New Jersey there is no need for fences.”

Coming from an individual who is sinister and dangerous, Bennett is not against the wall because he feels that walls will not be effective, but because he believes that all of the West Bank belongs to Israel. Given the opportunity, he would annex much of the West Bank outright — why then build a wall in one’s own land?

Netanyahu has never been committed to a two-state solution and is using the current violent flare-up, the so-called “knife Intifada,” as an excuse to cement Israel’s hold on much of the West Bank. His plan amounts to establishing small cantons for the Palestinians where they can exercise a sort of autonomous rule, while remaining under the watchful eye of the Israeli security forces.

A big part that gives Netanyahu the license to do what he wants is the sad complacency of the Israeli public, who has fallen into the national security trap that Netanyahu has so masterfully used to spread fear and dread among Israelis.

He successfully brainwashed the majority of Israelis to believe that the Palestinians pose a present and imminent danger and must be dealt with, not as human beings with whom one can reason, but wild beasts who are determined to destroy rather than coexist with Israel.

Netanyahu’s presumed recipe as he stated it, to “…surround the entire state of Israel with a fence, a barrier”, is nothing short of building a large prison for all Israelis.

To be sure, instead of reaching out to the Palestinians and the whole international community to reach an agreement with the Palestinians, he seeks to turn Israel into a garrison and apartheid state, detested by and isolated from the international community.

I wonder what the founders of Israel, who were dreaming of a just, moral, progressive, and compassionate Jewish state, would say had they been able to witness the moral decadence of a so-called leader who is shattering their noble dream and putting Israel’s very existence at risk.

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a professor of international relations at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • John Train

    @ Ben-Meir….This are Your Palestinian Peace Partners:

    1. Fatah official: Murdering Israelis is Palestinian “right”

    2. Jamal Muhaisen at memorial for killer of 2:”It is the right of our young men
    to cause Israeli women to cry,” says Fatah official, about terrorist who murdered two Israeli men leaving two young widows

    3. PLO official:Terrorist murderer of 2, Muhannad Halabi, is a “role model for generations of young”

    4. PA municipality erects memorial for terrorist Halabi on road already named after the terrorist

    5. A rally in murderer’s honor “turned into a national wedding”

  • john Train

    As a US military officer with extensive experience dealing with the Palestinians , Lebanese, Jordanians, Egyptians and Saudi Arabians and as a Christian I find that Alon Ben-Meir is delusionally dangerous both to the United States and to Israel

    Arafat on numerous occasions stated that if he really attempted to make peace he would be murdered. Most of the high level Palestinian officials I have dealt with have a vested interest in maintaining their thuggish hold over the Palestinian population. The US and Ben-Meir have not only sold out the Israeli population have also sold out the Palestinian population.

    Minor point : the article says that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s remarks (“wild beast”) is inflammatory. The words should have been translated as”predatory” which is accurate. The stronger (mis)translation is a tool of the left by which they knowingly inflict on America’s Jewish left who don’t know better. On the other hand referring to “dirty Jewish feet trampling on Muslim holy places” is not mentioned as being inflammatory.

    When ever we had a young officer who was so delusional as Ben-Meir, we would assign him to work directly in the field with the Palestinians. He would soon become exasperated with them and with the Ben-Meirs of the world. Unfortunately, Ben-Meir’s s students will go to the State Department, think tanks, and other universities and spread the stupidity, poison and vitriolic attacks on Israeli leaders. Ben-Meir should not be given a platform in your fine publication.

  • this ex-israeli author is a notorious hater of Netanyahu. anything Netanyahu does– anything– the author will slam and condemn. why you print his verbose drivel is beyond me.