Friday, December 15th | 27 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
April 1, 2016 7:39 am

Columbia University Gives Platform to Anti-Israel Blasphemy

avatar by Mara Schiffren

Email a copy of "Columbia University Gives Platform to Anti-Israel Blasphemy" to a friend
The Columbia University campus in New York City. Photo: Columbia.

The Columbia University campus in New York City. Photo: Columbia.

When protesters at a pro-Israel event at UC Davis unfurled a banner reading “1948=1492,” thereby drawing a connection between Israel’s founding in 1948 and Christopher Columbus’ discovery of America in 1492, it was “intersectionality” in action. Anti-Israel activists have appropriated this academic theory, which holds that oppressive social structures reinforce each other at every level, resulting in heightened oppression.

Illustrating this trend, the Center for Palestine Studies (CPS) at Columbia University recently held a lecture titled, “Palestine Re-Covered: Reading a Settler Colonial Landscape,” by Abdul Rahim al-Shaikh. Al-Shaikh is an associate professor of philosophy and cultural studies at Bir Zeit University, and a Fulbright Visiting Senior Scholar at CPS. The audience of approximately sixty people continued to trickle into one of the smaller semi-circular lecture halls in Jerome Greene Hall, even as al-Shaikh began. He opened with the aforementioned “intersection” between 1492 and the Zionist return to the land of Israel in the mid-nineteenth century:

The moment of 1492 is an intersection between the conquest of America and the conquest of Palestine. . . . 1492 is occupied by the threshold of the longstanding amalgam between the neo-American colonial enterprise and Zionism. Since then, the idea of America and the idea of Israel managed to form the power that realized the Zionist myth.

By employing the magic of intersectionality, al-Shaikh blamed Israel for an event that took place 456 years before its rebirth. Evoking “the myths of history being the West, and the West being history,” he claimed that Columbus’ colonization of the Indies both prefigured and predetermined the linguistic conquest of Palestine, later resulting in “geographic amnesia” among Palestinians towards their own land.

Related coverage

December 14, 2017 4:03 pm
0

‘Tis the Season to Recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital

If there ever was a time to move the United States embassy to Jerusalem, ‘tis the season. This week marks Hanukkah,...

Al-Shaikh declared that Columbus’ baptizing of native people in the Indies was the equivalent of the program by Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, to revitalize the Hebrew language in Israel by renaming “hills, valleys, streams, and bridges” throughout the land:

Long before social and cultural engineering was employed in modern nation states, Columbus . . . gave personal baptized names . . . to the Indians.  By the same token . . . in 1952, Ben Gurion was also in charge of determining Hebrew alternative words for foreign words.

During the question-and-answer period, Nadia Abu El-Haj, CPS assistant director and a Barnard College anthropology professor, pointed out the incomparability of these events. By denying that the Indians possessed language, she maintained, Columbus was effectively denying them personhood, whereas Ben-Gurion was merely implying that the Arabs were non-indigenous. Al-Shaikh, however, doubled down, insisting that the word Ben-Gurion used for the inhabitants was “zar,” which “means alien, literally alien, who is not an earthly being.”

In fact, the primary meaning of “zar,” a biblical word with a long history of common usage, is “stranger” or “immigrant alien.” Al-Shaikh’s contention was at best, incorrect, and at worst,disinformation for a presumably non-Hebrew speaking audience.

Throughout his talk, al-Shaikh was extremely sensitive to how the use of language shapes consciousness — which in his case meant the employment of propaganda. To that end, he employed the term “war criminal” repeatedly when referring to Israeli politicians Shimon Peres and Ariel Sharon, frequently called Rehavam Ze’evi “the fascist” minister of tourism, and asserted often that Palestinians whose families were uprooted during the War of Independence were “ethnically cleansed.” Such examples exemplify the active fashioning of perception through the use of language as part of his stated project of “counter cultural engineering.”

To illustrate “a Palestinian audio-visual response to the Zionist project,” al-Shaikh showed the audience a late 2015 music video by Palestinian heartthrob Mohammed Assaf, winner of the second season of “Arab Idol.” Assaf, whom al-Shaikh described simply as “a simple young man,” sang passionately of the murderous campaign of knife attacks in Israel as mobs of young Palestinian men hurtled rocks at Israeli targets and engaged IDF soldiers. The lyrics were unabashedly violent:

Oh motherland, these are your sons. They rose to fight the occupiers . . . The resistance will win.  And victory will come and Al-Aqsa will be free . . . Some were martyred, some were injured, their blood blossomed. And our precious blood is still spilling; [it] will draw the map of independence in our soil.

Mesmerized by the video, an audible “wow” arose from the audience. During the Q&A, several people personally thanked him for showing it, thereby demonstrating their appreciation for the incitement of Palestinian terrorism against Israeli civilians and others, such as the American tourist killed recently in Jaffa.

In closing, al-Shaikh stated blithely, “It is my serene hope that I have managed to strike a balance.” Yet his bigoted argument reflected a simplistic Manichaean view of good versus bad far more than any rigorous, informed reading of the past. In this, it drew more on antisemitic fervor than on a scholarly search for the truth. 

Mara Schiffren, who has a Ph.D. from Harvard University in the Study of Religion, is currently working on a book about historical Israel. This essay was commissioned by Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Rivky Serwatien

    Typical left wing moronic response.

  • Antonio Garcia

    Muslims are religious fascists.

  • Elliott Vizel

    Anti-Semitism all dolled up as a post-modern micronarrative – kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.

  • What can you expect from the worst antisemitic college in the US?
    http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/10-worst-anti-semitic-campuses

    Columbia used to be an an excellent school with way above average academic records.
    Now their degrees are not worthy of use as toilet paper. What happened?

    Are they getting their orders from the arab Gulf states or from Iran?

  • ricardo

    All this misdirection by the pro-terror intellectuals is both hypocritical, in that they claim that Israel is evil and employs violence, while they at the same time extol the virtues of their own far more violent society; and it’s anti-factual, when they presuppose that social values are a constant, and focus solely on Israel, employ such anachronistic parallels as Columbus merely to further their own hostility while refusing to acknowledge that:

    A: cultural values evolve over time
    B: EVERY region in the globe was resettled at some time in human history, often numerous times.
    C: Even the antisemitic UN Human Rights group, whatever their real name, espouses freedom of movement where lawful, and the Jews’ flight to Israel was for the most part lawful
    D: The Jews wanted to live in peace with their neighbors, but the crazies espoused the massacre of Jewish neighbors, even those living hundreds of kilometers away in swamps, and even those whose families had lived in the same towns since antiquity.
    E: The pro-terror crowd, even the “academics” (whose qualifications are certainly questionable when they conduct such anti-factual campaigns) insist that of all the nations founded in the period close to Israel’s establishment, including the Partition of India & Pakistand with the flight of 12 MILLION Mohammedans from India, ONLY Israel should remain unignored, un-normalized, unintegrated into the world bodies, and unaccepted as a country whose roots and history are the same as many others, and whose operative value systems far exceed most other countries in the world.
    and
    F: Most significantly, the Jews accepted the partition. The Arabs didn’t, still don’t, and have made clear that they never will. They want it all, with no vision of Jews continuing to live somewhere. Or, indeed, to live, period.

  • Pedro Santamaria

    But!…. But! 1942 is ALSO the year when Isabel and Fernando, Kings of Spain, expulse Jews from Spain !!!

    • Pedro Santamaria

      Sorry 1492 !!! (Was a lapsus)

  • rachel robinson

    In the year 1492 Spain also expelled its Jewish citizens out of the country. Maybe Columbus was Jewish an was looking for a place for those expelled Jews to settle in and he found a new land that was very sparsely populated and there was no anti Semitism there so he thought it would be a good place for Jews to escape to. There were of course no Palestinians anywhere in the world then, surely not in America and there was the Land God promised the Jews many years before 1492 but just as in Spain Jews were exiled from their land way before 1492. So Columbus discovered America for the Jews to settle in it, and many Jews did.

  • WIZ

    Typical right wing article.

    • ricardo

      Typical unanalytical, unrealistic Left-wing response.

    • So, you’re saying that hating on Jews is a left-wing value?

    • Zvi

      Being “right wing” article does not mean it is not true. In fact, most”left wing” articles are biased against Israel and contain false accusations or interpretations.

    • My family is maternally Chippewa. Reading the article and having seen tactics like his for decades now, I would say he has absolutely no credibility to be hired for this kind of work and has no education whatever in law. I mean, if he is going to fling words like “war criminal” around like the lint from his sweaters, he’s a guy who’s out on the campus who should today be held to account for his slanderous speech. Slander has to be proved through law to be properly applied to groups and individuals in public. You, sir, she the one who I would have on the stand. My family was compensated for proved violations of law. Suha Arafat, for example, seems to have ripped off Gaza’s public funds and had fun in Paris. Remember that? Remember how you all were kicked out of Kuwait?

Algemeiner.com