Tuesday, September 28th | 22 Tishri 5782

June 15, 2016 6:34 am

On Paris Peace Talks, Israel Must Resist the Sirens’ Song

avatar by Yoram Ettinger

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) with US Secretary of State John Kerry in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) with US Secretary of State John Kerry in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

In 850 BC, the legendary Greek author Homer introduced the mythical king of Ithaca, Odysseus, as a role model of leadership. Sailing home from the battlefield, Odysseus overcame temptations to dwell on wishful-thinking rather than reality. He overcame supreme seduction to stray away from the proper course of navigation, and join the beautiful Sirens, who lured sailors with their seductively hypnotizing voices, music, and beauty and led them to shipwreck on the rocky coast of their island.

In 2016, the modern-day Sirens of the Western media and policy-making try to divert Israel from the proper course of combating terrorism, contending that “one’s terrorist is someone else’s freedom fighter;” that Palestinian terrorism is reaction to occupation; that Palestinian terrorists are “lone wolves,” not institutional; and that Islam is a religion of peace, not terrorism. However, contrary to the actions of freedom fighters, Palestinian terrorism — a branch of the 1,400-year-old inherent Islamic terrorism — has targeted Jewish and mostly Arab non-combatants deliberately, institutionally and systematically, as prescribed by the Quran, the Palestinian Covenant, and Palestinian hate-education in schools, mosques, and the media.

Moreover, Palestinian terrorism has plagued the Middle East since the 1930s — before the 1948 establishment of Israel and the 1967 Six Day War — focusing on Israel’s existence, not “occupation;” triggering civil wars, subversion, and terrorism in Egypt (1950s), Syria (1960s), Lebanon (1970s and 1980s), and Kuwait (1990); assisting Saddam Hussein’s and Assad’s repression of Iraq and Syria; and systematically siding with anti-US and anti-Western rogue regimes, such as North Korea and Iran.

In 2016, Israel’s leadership is cajoled by modern-day Sirens from the US, Europe, and Arab countries to stray away from its national security course of navigation, which has been charted by costly geo-strategic experience, security constraints and requirements, historical reality, and commitments made to constituents.

Related coverage

September 27, 2021 2:41 pm

New York Times Publishes Yom Kippur Correction on Jewish Sovereignty in Land of Israel

The New York Times issued a Yom Kippur correction for an article that had falsely stated that previous periods of...

The modern-day Sirens attempt to allure Israel to join a tempting, seemingly-unprecedented regional peace-for-our-time initiative, pampered by peaceful Arab talk, US and NATO security guarantees, possibly Western troops on Israel’s borders, and a lavish economic package. Israel is enticed to accept a demilitarized Palestinian state on its borders, the re-division of Jerusalem, the uprooting of Jewish communities in the Land of Israel, and the miniaturization of its size — in the increasingly tectonic Middle East — to a 9-15-mile-sliver along the Mediterranean, over-towered by the mountain ridges of Judea and Samaria, which are the “Golan Heights” of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Ben Gurion international airport, Israel’s major freeway (#6), and 80% of Israel’s population and infrastructure.

The contemporary Sirens try to smog Israel’s critical requirements of strategic depth for potential upheavals in Jordan and Egypt, which would cause havoc domestically, regionally and globally, and pose a survival threat to the Jewish State. Middle Eastern realism requires security contingencies for future — rather than present day – lethal threats, emerging dramatically, unpredictably and frequently.

The 2016 proposed regional peace initiative is the latest in a litany of Western and Arab peace initiatives – introduced since 1948 – which have been wrecked on the rugged surface of the Middle East. These initiatives have stipulated dramatic Israeli concessions, and therefore fueling – not extinguished – violence, as demonstrated by the 1993 Oslo Accord and the 2005 disengagement from Gaza, resulting in unprecedented Palestinian incitement, hate-education, terrorism, missile salvos and non-compliance with agreements.

Just like Homer’s Sirens, the contemporary Sirens expect Israel to sacrifice long-term principles, values, and national security on the altar of short-term pleasure and convenience. They attempt to dupe Israel’s Odysseus into an illusory vision, camouflaging regional Islamic/Arab reality, which would lead to an Israeli shipwreck on the 14-century-old Middle Eastern rocks: inherent intra-Muslim fragmentation, endemic instability, unpredictability, intra-Muslim terrorism, the absence of democracy and civil liberties, tenuous rogue regimes, and more.

Israel is expected to be hoodwinked into assuming that a retreat to the pre-1967 lines (with minor modifications), would convince Muslims to accord the “infidel” Jewish state that which Muslim “believers” have not accorded each other since the 7th century: peaceful-coexistence and compliance with agreements. Israel is expected to assume that “land-for-peace” is a constructive option in the Middle East, where concessions are defined as a symptom of weakness, resulting in intensified pressure and terrorism.

The 2016 Sirens are trying to lure Israel into underestimating the dominant role of supremacist Islam, Arab ideology and clannish, tribal and local loyalties even among “secular,” “moderate” and “modern” Arab leaders, as well as the unbridgeable gap between Middle Eastern and Western ethos, values and state of mind.  The Sirens wish to afflict Israel with the suspension-of-disbelief, defining the Arab Tsunami of the last five years as an Arab Spring, transitioning toward democracy and peaceful-coexistence.

Israel is expected to abide by wishful-thinking, deluding itself that the 14-century-old Middle East brutal reality could be subordinated to — and shaped by — peace process procedures, diplomatic formalities, and written agreements, in a region known for lack of civil liberties, frequent and drastic regime changes, huge walk-talk gaps, and systematic non-compliance with agreements. Therefore, Israel is expected to tolerate a Palestinian state, notwithstanding the track record of its highest authority — the PLO — as the role model of international terrorism, rogue regimes, oppression and corruption.

The Sirens expect Israel to embrace Western oversimplification, conventional “wisdom” and the misperceptions that the Palestinian issue is a crown-jewel of Arab policy-makers, the crux of the Arab-Israeli conflict, a core-cause of Middle East turbulence, and a trigger of anti-Western Islamic terrorism. None of which is reality-driven.

Israel’s 1948 Odysseus, David Ben-Gurion, was enveloped by Israeli and American Sirens, who attempted to trick him into postponing the establishment of the Jewish state and conceding land in the Negev, Galilee, and Jerusalem. However, with a population of 650,000 Jews, a meager military, barely any economy, and less than a skeleton of international relations, Ben-Gurion stayed his course in defiance of immense Arab and international odds, which were assessed by the CIA as, potentially, “another Holocaust.”

Will the 2016 Israeli leadership — benefiting from 6.7 million Jews, a powerful military force, a robust economy, and an all-time-high global integration — be seduced by the Sirens, or will it follow in footsteps of Ben-Gurion, embracing the Odysseus legacy?

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.