Saturday, September 23rd | 3 Tishri 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 12, 2016 6:33 am

Why Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei Is Supremely Confident

avatar by Ziva Dahl / JNS.org

Email a copy of "Why Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei Is Supremely Confident" to a friend
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.org – One year after they signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, known as the “Iran deal,” the Iranians are secretly attempting to procure illicit nuclear technology and equipment. So says Germany’s domestic intelligence agency. It appears that the mullahs are supremely confident that America and the West will do nothing to enforce the agreement.

Looking back on the Iran nuclear deal and the singular role Iran’s American lobby, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), played in the formulation and promotion of the agreement, it’s clear that Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s past experience with President Barack Obama has given him good reason to believe the current US administration will continue to play ball.

Iran designated NIAC as the Iranian lobby in the US and coordinated its efforts with government agencies in Tehran. To its American audience, NIAC, founded in 2002 by Iranian Trita Parsi, presented itself as “the largest grassroots Iranian-American organization advancing the interests of the Iranian-American community.” But only our government seemed to believe this. When polled, Iranian Americans felt that NIAC was a lobby for the ayatollah’s Islamic Republic.

From its inception, years before the Obama presidency, DC-based NIAC and its allies advocated that the US must offer broad “economic, security, and diplomatic concessions” to Iran; “embark on a policy of unconditional dialogue and sanctions relief” to normalize relations; and in the interest of regional stability, encourage an Iranian “sphere of influence.”

Related coverage

September 20, 2017 4:35 pm
0

Does the President Have the Right to Expect Loyalty From his Attorney General?

This article was first published by Gatestone Institute. Recent news reports describe the president chastising his Attorney General Jeff Sessions for disloyalty. According...

Much of what we know about NIAC’s activities comes from internal documents of a 2008 defamation lawsuit NIAC filed against an Iranian US. journalist who had called NIAC and Parsi “key players in the lobby enterprise of Tehran’s ayatollahs in the United States.”

Court evidence exposed NIAC’s central role in promoting Iran’s geopolitical interests. Parsi, NIAC’s first and only president, has ties to Tehran and maintains a long-term working relationship with Iranian Foreign Minister and chief nuclear negotiator Mohammad Javad Zarif.  The court dismissed the case in 2013 and found that Parsi’s work for NIAC was “not inconsistent with the idea that he was first and foremost an advocate for the [Iranian] regime.”

Parsi dangled “access to Iranian markets” before various business interests. Perhaps Boeing was one of them? He advocated “respecting” the Islamic Republic, insisting that Iran and the US shared common goals. A 2008 NIAC document stated that, in one month, NIAC met with more than 50 Democratic and Republican members of Congress.

In articles and a book, Parsi urged the US to distance itself from Israel, “the sole force behind…the sanctions against Iran,” and launched a campaign to minimize the importance of Iran’s systemic antisemitism, which he called irrelevant.

The 2008 election of Obama gave the Iranian lobby an ally in the White House. Had Khamenei been able to personally select a US president, he could not have chosen one more aligned with his goals than Obama. Both were convinced that the US was the source of problems around the globe and both were committed to US-Middle East disengagement.

During his 2008 presidential campaign, Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran via William Miller, former US ambassador to Iran, to assure Khamenei that he would like Obama’s policies.

Echoing the 50-year Iranian blame-claim against the CIA, Obama, in his 2009 Cairo speech, said that the US “played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government” and, later that year, parroting NIAC messaging, stated the US “seeks a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect.”

Throughout his first term, Obama displayed his eagerness to engage with Iran, sending letters to Khamenei and repeating NIAC’s talking points regarding Iran’s important potential leadership role and the need for rapprochement.

In a 2011 Huffington Post article, Parsi advocates for Iran’s legitimate role in the Middle East and asks, “Is the United States ready to share the region with Iran?”  In a 2012 letter to Obama, NIAC urges negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program “to prevent war,” painting critics of détente as warmongers.

In his second term, no longer restrained by re-election realities, the American president pushed detente with the terror state and a nuclear deal in keeping with NIAC’s lobbying goals. The Obama administration defined the Iran situation as a choice between “a nuclear deal or war,” a dichotomy straight out of NIAC’s (and Iran’s) playbook.

In December 2014, Obama told NPR that Iran’s “legitimate aspirations” should be respected. He speculated that the Islamic Republic “could be a very successful regional power.” Interviewed in The Atlantic, Obama claimed that the regime’s anti-Semitism is just an “organizing tool,” used “at the margins” and didn’t override Tehran’s other strategic interests. Again, NIAC messaging.  Convinced that Israel was an impediment to rapprochement with Iran, Obama put “daylight” between Washington and Jerusalem, a recommendation promoted by Parsi.

Throughout the Obama presidency, NIAC continued to proselytize State Department, Department of Defense, White House, and CIA personnel; briefed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; and met with Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett. Two former NIAC staffers are important advisors to the president and the State Department on Iran policy.

The Iranians used their influence to manipulate a malleable, inexperienced American president — a man predisposed to the idea of Iranian Middle East hegemony — to capitulate to the world’s most prolific state sponsor of terror. They realized that Obama was desperate for a nuclear deal to jump-start his transformative foreign policy legacy, and used this vulnerability.

In David Samuels’s New York Times interview in May, Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, bragged about creating an “echo chamber” within the media and organizations outside of the White House to sell the Iran nuclear deal to the public. He failed to mention that it was Iran — through NIAC, its American lobby — that created an “echo chamber” within the Obama administration to promote the deal in the first place.

Khamenei took the measure of our president and played Obama like a fiddle, with NIAC as its bow. He’s now reaping the benefits of this sophisticated shell game.

Ziva Dahl is a fellow with the Haym Salomon Center with a Master of Arts degree in public law and government from Columbia University and an A.B. in political science from Vassar College.  Her bylines appear in the New York Daily News, the New York Observer, and The Hill.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Laird A. Doctor

    There is an old saying, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck. Obama has said, “the most beautiful sound in the morning is the(Muslim) call to prayer.” He has bowed down before the leaders of most of the Mideast nations with the obvious exclusion of Israel. The consisted disassociation with Israel and closer ties to the Mideast Muslim nations by Obama has made it clear to me that the duck is a Muslim! I believe that one of the greatest enemies to Mideast stability and the advancement of militant Muslim activities is none other than Obama. He has single-handedly devastated the American military to the point that it’s fundamental missions cannot fully be implemented. The Department of Defense has been relegated to be a paper tiger. Yes, the tiger still has sharp teeth, but Obama has put a permanent muzzle on it. With the national debt rapidly closing in on equally with the Gross National Product, there will never be enough funds to rebuild the Defense Department. I do not believe that Israel can ever again count on a relationship, as it used to be, with America before Obama.

  • Reform School

    In Racist-in-Chief Obama’s “Americker”—as he calls it— wealthy donors from Nyack and NIAC all sound the same.

  • Theodore Crawford

    Thank you, Ms. Dahl, for bringing the insidious nature of the Iran Deal into stark clarity.

  • Lia

    Fiddle yes, not violin …

  • Obama is Iran’s patsy and the sooner he leaves office an goes to camel land land the better. Trump and America have overwhelming problems that Obama has left behind that need fixing. Nothing now is more terrifying than realisation of what “Yes We Can” truly meant.

  • Diana Epstein

    Excellent article!! Thanks you for this most articulate and compelling piece!

Algemeiner.com