Saturday, October 21st | 1 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
August 16, 2016 12:38 pm

British Jews Applying for German Passports? The New York Times Is on It!

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "British Jews Applying for German Passports? The New York Times Is on It!" to a friend
A German passport. Photo: Wikipedia.

A German passport. Photo: Wikipedia.

Just how ridiculous was the New York Times news article about British Jews applying for German citizenship — and the Times’ decision to place the story on the front page, above the fold?

Let us count the ways.

First, the story involves a tiny number of people. The Times reports that after the Brexit vote in June, “the German embassy in London said it had received at least 400 requests from Britons for information about German citizenship under a legal provision known as Article 116. At least 100 are formal applications by individuals or families, said Knud Noelle, an embassy official.”

The Times doesn’t say how many of those 100 applications are by Jews and how many are by others. At least some of them are almost certainly from people who had a Jewish grandparent and now belong to some other religion, or from descendants of what the Times describes as “other minorities and political opponents” of the Nazis.

Related coverage

October 20, 2017 1:51 pm
0

Hamas Supporter to Receive Award From Harvard Student Group

He has publicly endorsed Hamas, and secretly schemed with Hamas' supporters to thwart US-led peace efforts in the Middle East. Now Nihad Awad is preparing for a prestigious...

Assume, generously, that 90 of the 100 are Jews. That amounts to a mere three hundredths of one percent of the United Kingdom’s Jewish population of 288,000. That total Jewish population number appears nowhere in the Times article, perhaps because including it would demonstrate how marginal and fringe a phenomenon is the one that the Times is inflating into a top-of-the-front-page story. Just for perspective’s sake, the other day, 2 million people in Aleppo were without water because of the war in Syria, and the Times played that story at the bottom of an inside page.

Got that? Two million Syrians could die of thirst because of ISIS and Bashar Assad, and the Times doesn’t particularly care. But 90 British Jews apply for German passports, and the Times puts the story, bizarrely, at the top of page one.

Another way that the Times article about the British Jews is ridiculous is that it fails, entirely, to mention Israel. As the Algemeiner reported in January, 774 British Jews emigrated to Israel in 2015, an increase of nearly 25 percent over the year before. That’s more than seven times as many as have applied for German passports, yet somehow the Times top-of-the-front-page story on British Jews moving to Israel is — well, that’s a story the Times never wrote, never mind placed at the top of the front page, maybe because it might contradict the newspaper’s persistent efforts to depict Israel as an undesirable war zone, besieged by violent terrorists and ruled by racist religious extremists.

Finally, fully 400 words — a third of the text — and one of the two photographs that appear with the Times article concern one Thomas Harding:

The great-grandson of Alfred Alexander, a prominent doctor in Berlin whose patients included Albert Einstein and Marlene Dietrich, Mr. Harding, 48, said that his desire for citizenship stemmed from a project to restore his great-grandfather’s home, which was seized by the Nazis and only recently returned to the family.

The summer house, on Berlin’s westernmost border in Gross Glienicke, Germany, and near what used to be a Nazi airfield, was awarded a landmark status in 2014 and turned into a memorial for truth and reconciliation.

The project was the focus of his recently published book, “The House by the Lake.” Villagers of Gross Glienicke had initially reached out to him for a separate project researching the village’s Jewish families, including his.

Sound familiar? It should; last month, the Times published an entire 900-word dispatch from Berlin about the same guy and the same house. It began:

BERLIN — Thomas Harding, a Briton in his late 40s, led the way into a decrepit single-story wooden structure on an overgrown lakeside plot on Berlin’s westernmost border in Gross Glienicke. “There used to be French doors there that opened onto the terrace,” he said of his Jewish great-grandparents’ weekend house. “And behind there,” he said pointing to the wall on the right, “There was Elsie and Bella’s bedroom, with a door into the living room.”

The house, which had been built by Mr. Harding’s German Jewish great-grandfather Alfred Alexander in 1927, is the subject of his book “The House by the Lake,” which traces German history through the five families that occupied the property. The book became a best seller in Britain when it came out last fall and was released last week in the United States.

Maybe Mr. Harding has a particularly industrious or well-connected publicist, or maybe he himself has some high-level Times connections. About the only thing missing is a one-click-ordering link to the book’s Amazon page. Or maybe the Times is so overstaffed, and has so much empty newsprint to fill, that it feels compelled to cover the same marginally newsworthy story two times, with two different reporters. I tweeted at a London-based New York Times editor of international news and at the reporter of the front-page story featuring Mr. Harding, asking them about the duplication and whether Mr. Harding had some Times tie, and I got no response. Perhaps the whole situation is just the latest example of what I call the Times’ post-Holocaust Holocaust obsession.

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.  

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Stan Nadel

    Man bites dog story makes the front page, 10,000 dogs bite men story gets no coverage–that’s how the news business works.

  • Also it would be relevant to know the average amount of applications per month before the Brexit vote, don’t you think?

  • If you have no news, make something up. The bigger the lie,the better.

  • Please put me on your mail on list. Thanks

  • Jonathan Hoffman

    Nothing wrong with applying for a passport of an EU member after the UK referendum. Nothing at all.

    And as for ‘not mentioning Israel’, Israel has nothing to do with this story.

  • Marie van Wyk

    Why is Israel always made to be the so-called culprit? Jealousy. As the saying goes: Jealousy makes you nasty!! People secure in their skin would ALWAYS recognise excellence in others and give credit!
    And Israel and the Jewish people are a model of moral and intellectual excellence and joie de vivre!

  • I suspect that most if not all the Jews, if there were any (how did they know they were Jews anyway?) who applied were not British subjects but merely living in the UK, but because they had a grandparent or other close relative who had their German citizenship revoked by the Nazis they were eligible for German citizenship. I knew someone from a Jewish person from New Zealand who could not work in the UK because of the ridiculous and racist EU laws but her grandfather had been born in Germany, so by getting a German passport she could work in the UK.

  • richard sherwin

    the NYT’s famous for working on the ww2 canadian foreign office principle ‘one jew is two many’….so what’s new…. where’s it’s treatment of half a million mid eastern and north african jews absorbed by Israel compared to arab refusal to absorb even less palestinians. resulting in the fake demogs of ‘palestine’….? if one’s too many, what are half a million?

  • Al Talena

    NY Slime

  • Curt

    ” it feels compelled to cover the same marginally newsworthy story two times, with two different reporters.”

    Obviously, the second reporter didn’t think the first story was worth reading.

Algemeiner.com