Friday, July 20th | 8 Av 5778

August 16, 2016 6:05 am

The New York Times at 120

avatar by Jerold Auerbach

Email a copy of "The New York Times at 120" to a friend
The New York Times newsroom, 1942. Photo: Wikipedia.

The New York Times newsroom, 1942. Photo: Wikipedia.

One hundred and twenty years ago, on August 18, 1896, the precociously ambitious 28-year-old publisher of the Chattanooga Times, Adolph S. Ochs, purchased the financially flailing New York Times. Rejecting the sensationalist “yellow journalism” of its competitors, Ochs preferred a “clean, dignified and trustworthy” newspaper that would, in the enduring front-page motto that he introduced two months later, provide “All the News That’s Fit to Print.”

Six months previously, a Jewish lawyer-turned-journalist named Theodor Herzl had published a pamphlet entitled Der Judenstaat, propelling Zionism to world attention. In its first mention of Herzl  the Times identified him as “originator of the Zionist scheme.” With the approaching Zionist conference in Basel in August 1897, it paid closer attention to “The Jewish State Idea,” warily wondering “is it feasible”?

In Europe and the United States, the Times concluded, “There are many Jews who oppose the founding of this State on the ground that it could only be a small, weak State, existing by sufferance.” It was also “urged” – although the Times did not identify those doing the urging – “that Israel’s mission is no longer political, but purely and simply religious, and that the establishment of the State would do incalculable harm, and could do no good.” Indeed, it would inevitably raise the lurking menace of dual loyalty that has haunted the Times ever since.

Once the delegates in Basel endorsed the idea of Jewish statehood “with great enthusiasm,” the Times became even warier. Identifying Herzl as “the so-called ‘New Moses,’” it reprinted a sharply critical article from the American Israelite, the newspaper of Reform Judaism, excoriating him and his followers as “romantic Zealots” lacking “the least intention to benefit Judaism.” The establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, it firmly declared (and wishfully hoped), was “an impossibility.” The author of that diatribe was Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, who guided Reform Judaism’s embrace of the United States as the American Zion.

Rabbi Wise was also Adolph Ochs’s father-in-law. Married to his daughter Effie, their daughter Iphigene would marry Arthur Hays Sulzberger, launching the family dynasty that has remained loyal to Och’s determination that the Times would never appear to be a “Jewish” newspaper. Sulzberger succeeded Ochs as publisher in 1935, just in time for the Times to ignore the worsening plight of European Jews confronting the looming threat of Nazi Germany. Fearful lest the Times be identified as a “Jewish” newspaper, he insisted that the targeting of Jews for extermination be ignored and reports of Nazi genocide buried on its inside pages. Future executive editor Max Frankel would lament its “staggering, staining failure” to report the Holocaust, which in Laurel Leff’s haunting book title was Buried by The Times.

Sulzberger’s antipathy to the very idea of Jewish statehood, and his agitation over Zionist advocacy, were expressed in his enthusiastic support for the staunchly anti-Zionist American Council for Judaism. It received extensive favorable Times coverage vastly disproportionate to its size or influence. The newspaper’s post-war focus on Jewish “terrorists” in Palestine, in conjunction with its repeated reiteration of Rabbi Judah Magnes’s bi-national alternative to Zionism, reached its apogee of apprehension once Jewish statehood was imminent. Disregarding the exultation of Jews in Israel following its Proclamation of Independence, Times foreign correspondent Dana Adams Schmidt focused on “a tendency to authoritarianism in the nascent Jewish state.”

Discomfort with Zionism, conspicuous among its Jewish reporters and columnists, has framed Times coverage of Israel ever since. Jerusalem bureau chiefs Thomas Friedman and Jodi Rudoren embedded criticism of Israel in their reporting, while Anthony Lewis and Roger Cohen (among others) became cheerleaders against the Jewish state from Washington. In editorials and op-eds the Times transformed Palestinians into the new Jews, whose struggle for statehood, unlike the aspirations of Zionists before 1948, it has avidly embraced.

Times journalists unknowingly followed in the ideological footsteps of Joseph M. Levy, its first Jewish Jerusalem-based correspondent. After the Arab riots in 1929 he consorted with Rabbi Magnes, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and renegade British civil servant H. St-John Philby (who would convert to Islam and father the notorious double agent Kim) to use the Times as their forum to thwart Zionist efforts.

In Exodus 6:3 God identifies the human lifetime as one 120 years. The New York Times of Adolph Ochs and his Sulzberger descendants has reached that biblical benchmark. But if ”what’s past is prologue” (as Shakespeare suggested), “All the News That’s Fit to Print” will continue to reflect their abiding discomfort with the thriving Jewish state in the ancient homeland of the Jewish people.

Jerold S. Auerbach is completing a book about The New York Times, Zionism and Israel 1896-2016.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • naro

    you bloody bastards. you erased my post. go to hell idiots. I am done with your web site. lechu leazazel.

  • naro

    Ad mea veesrim to the NYTimes. Now die.
    The NYTimes is struggeling and is on financial life support. The Mexican Arab Carlos Slim is now the biggest investor in the company. It carries little ads, and I wish readers would ask its advertisers to boycott this degenerate propaganda outlet for Israel haters.

  • Dislike! If JFK was president today, today’s NYT would accuse him of being a right wing extremist for reducing taxes, reducing unemployment, increasing GDP and blockading Cuba to stop the Soviet Union from positioning missiles less than 100 miles from Florida.
    In the 1975 ‘Zionism = Racism’ UN debate the NYT was totally on Patrick Moynihan’s and Haim Herzog’s side fighting a losing war of words against East European and Arab dictatorships. On the other hand, today Thomas Friedman & Co have become virulently anti-Israel, anti-Zionism often bordering on (partly Jewish) anti-Semitism. Shame on them!

  • “…the establishment of the State would do incalculable harm, and could do no good.”

    Indeed, the “New York Times” was wrong about Israel in 1897, and continues this “meshegas” in 2016.