Wednesday, May 24th | 28 Iyyar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
September 12, 2016 2:50 pm

Lawyer Suing Facebook Scoffs at Purportedly Fruitful Anti-Incitement Meeting Between Israeli Ministers, Social Media Execs

avatar by Ruthie Blum

Email a copy of "Lawyer Suing Facebook Scoffs at Purportedly Fruitful Anti-Incitement Meeting Between Israeli Ministers, Social Media Execs" to a friend
Shurat Ha-Din-The Israel Law Center. Photo: Facebook.

Shurat Ha-Din-The Israel Law Center. Photo: Facebook.

The head of the organization behind a billion-dollar lawsuit against Facebook for its alleged enabling of incitement to terrorism on its pages told The Algemeiner that she was “not impressed” by Monday’s purportedly fruitful meeting between Israeli ministers and executives of the social-media giant.

“It is nothing more than the usual public-relations stunt,” said attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner — founder of Shurat HaDin-The Israel Law Center, an NGO whose mission is to combat terrorism through lawfare — in reference to the get-together of a visiting Facebook delegation with Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan to discuss methods for putting a stop to the incitement phenomenon. Following the meeting, all in attendance announced they would work together to fight the spread of hate-filled material that leads to physical violence.

“Even as they spoke, Facebook was proving a platform to terrorist incitement and recruitment,” Darshan-Leitner said. “And all it would have to do to — if it so decided — is press a button and remove the content in question.”

Related coverage

May 24, 2017 2:32 pm
0

Mother of American Victim of Palestinian Attack Calls for International Pressure on Palestinian Authority Over Terror Payments

The mother of an American victim of a 2015 Palestinian terror attack in the West Bank issued a clarion call...

Nor is this the first time Facebook has agreed to cooperate with Israel in the effort to combat incitement, she added. “But all that happens as a result is some grandiose joint announcement, while the dangerous activity itself continues unabated on the site,” she said.

Darshan-Leitner told The Algemeiner that it was not in Facebook’s financial interest to eradicate the pages in question, which, she said, garner millions of likes, shares and comments — the platform’s lifeblood and source of massive profits. “The Hamas online magazine, for example, has four million followers,” she said.

“Until it is hit where it lives — in the pocket — Facebook won’t cease enabling terrorism,” she asserted, “which is why we are moving ahead with our class-action suit.”

Darshan-Leitner said she was optimistic about winning, due to American anti-terrorism legislation.

She concluded by saying, “Now that Facebook has made the journey from Palo Alto to Jerusalem to talk about incitement, maybe it can take the next step and actually do something about it.”

Darshan-Leitner began her legal battle against Facebook last October, at the height of the Palestinian “lone-wolf intifada,” which had begun a month earlier.

Neither incitement nor antisemitism, she told The Algemeiner at the time, was “new in the Palestinian Authority or in Gaza. But, typically, [they have] been disseminated through sermons in mosques, teachings in schools, speeches in public squares and on TV. Today, [they are] being spread like wildfire through social media networks.”

Regarding the claim that such networks can only react to incendiary material, rather than prevent it from popping up, Darshan-Leitner asserted then — and reiterated on Monday — that “it is ridiculous to say that Facebook cannot monitor these things. Notice its millions of algorithms that know exactly what you like to wear and eat, who your friends are, what music you’re interested in, etc. How else do ads aimed specifically at you mysteriously appear in your feed and on the side of the page? If it’s got algorithms for consumer purposes, it can have algorithms for other purposes, as well.”

As was reported in The Algemeiner a few months ago, Israeli lawmakers drafted legislation that could force Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and other social media platforms to remove incitement.

“There should be some measure of accountability for Internet companies regarding the illegal activities and content that is published through their services,” Justice Minister Shaked said in June at the 6th Annual International Cybersecurity Conference in Tel Aviv.

In July, Erdan accused Facebook and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, of not doing enough to prevent incitement against Israel, and said the social network was “sabotaging” Israeli police work.

As The Algemeiner reported throughout the surge in terrorism that began a year ago this month, many young Palestinians posted their intention to kill Israelis on Facebook before actually setting out to do so — and often succeeding.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Holy Shirt

    Mark these words, Suckerpurge has held the solution in his pinko finger since Day Go.

  • stevenl

    Zuck Sucks! He is an antisemite who tries to save what he can!

  • Ephraim

    She is right. Doing nothing is NOT doing enough! Unfortunately, the self-hater in charge will never stop antisemitism unless he is forced to. Remember that ‘test’ where a pro-Israel account and a pro-terrorist account were each set up on Facebook? Facebook pulled the plug on the pro-Israel account, but could find nothing wrong with the terrorist one. Yes, that is antisemitism, and Zuckerberg is dead guilty. Good luck with your lawsuit!

  • Facebook is run by a bunch of white-shoe, CYA execs.

    All these jerks are doing on their visit is covering their butt, making it appear as though they fight incitement.

    It’s a load of nonsense.

    They likely have teams of MBA’s inside Facebook advising management that anti-Semitism is good for business.

  • Zuckerberg is a real piece of work when it comes to stopping anti-Semitism.

    A worse self-hating Jew probably could not be found for his job, no matter whether he really hates his people or not.

  • Lia

    Yeah woman!!!

  • Currently, there is no measure of accountability for social media companies that permit Anti-Israel incitement on their servers. Social media will continue to test free speech limits until a credible use of litigation forces them to remove terrorist incitement.

  • Hamanslayer

    Of course Nitsana Darshan-Leitner is absolutely right, and she should be encouraged in every way by both Jews and non-Jews who are pro Israel.
    However, what this report does not tell you — and I believe Ms. Darshan-Leitner has demonstrated this with actual Facebook posts — is that Facebook practices an ignominious bias, allowing incitement and insults against Jews and Israel (as permitted by protected free speech), but censoring any similar negative posts by pro-Israel commenters against Islamists, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and so on (as being against the Facebook community policy).
    The moment Facebook starts to practice total even-handedness you will see a wave of change in the attitudes of many pseudo-liberal celebrities, and even many academics — who you might think have a mind of their own, but often do not.

  • Yaakov

    Who gets how much money if they win?

    • “Yaakov”–sounds to me that you really don’t give a darn about justice.

      In fact, you sound like an anti-Semite.

    • ZG

      The victims of Palestinian terror.

    • Lucifer69

      Not relevant. Idea is to hit them in the pocket.

Algemeiner.com