Monday, March 27th | 29 Adar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
November 4, 2016 3:48 am

Jews, Moderation and Wine

avatar by Jeremy Rosen

Email a copy of "Jews, Moderation and Wine" to a friend
Wine at the Carmel Winery in Israel's Mt. Carmel area. Photo: Lisa Stern.

Wine at the Carmel Winery in Israel’s Mt. Carmel area. Photo: Lisa Stern.

When Noah comes out of the ark, the first thing he does (after thanking God) is plant a vineyard, and then make wine. But then he gets drunk and rolls around naked in his tent. You might think that being shut up with one’s family and zoo animals for a whole year would be enough to make anyone drink. Later on in the text, Abraham’s nephew Lot will get drunk and commit incest.

The Torah does not ban alcohol. Quite the contrary. It was a crucial part of Temple ceremonial practices and remains an important element of ritual today. What Noah and Lot show is that any good thing can be taken to extremes. What starts as a genuine pleasure can soon lead to degradation.

The first archaeological evidence we have of wine dates back some 7,000 years — to remains found in jars in Persia that were associated with religious and burial customs. The earliest winery, which goes back some 5,000 years, was found in the Caucasus Mountains.

Related coverage

March 27, 2017 6:50 am
0

New York Times Reviewer Insists Jihadist Attacks in US Are ‘Relatively Few’

Writing about a Showtime documentary titled “American Jihad,” a television reviewer for the New York Times reports that the film...

Throughout the ancient world, wine and blood were used in pagan worship. In Rome, men and women doused themselves and bathed in both, and the association was perpetuated in the Christian ritual of Communion, in which the wine one drinks miraculously turns into blood. Little wonder that such a mindset soon twists into claiming that Jews drink Christian blood on Passover. The blood libel has now migrated into much of Islam.

Because of this association of wine with pagan worship, the Mishna and Gemara forbade Yayin Nesech — wine that is poured out (to other gods). Anything to do with paganism was treated extremely strictly. In times gone by, water was often contaminated, and most people avoided it. Instead, the poor drank beers of different kinds, and the rich drank wine. Wine was associated with banquets and, of course, with the philosophical symposia in ancient Greece. Ordinary wine, Stam Yayin, was banned in the Talmud in order to avoid fraternization and the chances of intermarriage. It was not a one way process. Both Christianity and Islam at various stages forbade their faithful from marrying Jews.

I should add that the issue of intermarriage is neither a racial nor an exclusivist issue. Genuine converts have always been welcomed, regardless of race, if their motives were a genuine commitment to Torah. The issue is continuity. Statistically the chances of the children of such unions ending up as committed Jews is minimal.

But the law regarding wine is usually practical. In almost all cases, a degree of laxity crept in, because with increasing travel and commerce the ban simply wasn’t practical in many situations. So by the time Jewish law became codified in the Shulchan Aruch (16th century), this is an abstract of how the law appeared (Yoreh Deah 114):

Ordinary wine of Idol Worshippers is forbidden to the touch or to drink (because of use in Idolatry). But nowadays idolatry is rare and ordinary non-Jewish wine is forbidden to avoid intermarriage…other strong drink is also forbidden similarly but only where it is sold, but one may bring it home and drink it there…but others permit it and that is the custom in our communities

This last comment, by the way, was referring to the custom in Europe. Under Islam, drinking wine was confined to the lax and the wealthy.

As with many issues, attitudes varied from place to place. Some were strict. Others were not. All sorts of variations can be found in Jewish law.

I have lived through a change in religious fashion. Once even the strictest authorities allowed non-Jewish wine at supervised Jewish functions, as well as drinking liquors and whiskeys without supervision. Nowadays, the most restrictive rules have become the norm. Fifty years ago no one thought that whiskeys (whisky applies exclusively to Scotch) needed supervision. Indeed, the major halachic authorities around the world dismissed issues. But nowadays the haredi world no longer accepts anything that is unsupervised, even vegetables and fruit.

So, what is kosher wine? Not what it says. There used to be, it is true, non-kosher additives to wines to clear the sediments, such as dried blood or isinglass from a non-kosher fish. But in truth they were not technically a problem because of the minute quantity and the fact that they had no impact on taste or color. Sure, there have always been cases of abuse and illegality. But so have there been among haredi butchers and grocers. In Jewish Law, we follow the majority. Kosher wine is not an issue of ingredients. It is simply saying that the process of wine-making (which is almost entirely mechanized nowadays) has been observed, to guarantee that no human has touched the precious fluids.

There are explanations as to why we have become so unbelievably strict. One is the fact that intermarriage has become so much greater a problem than it ever was, so anything that might be regarded as a safeguard is latched onto with a passion by those who care about it. And social drinking is such a feature of our society (and a cause of much that goes wrong) that the desire to limit it is not unreasonable. The other is that with the massive expansion of the kosher supervision industry, any excuse for increasing its range and monopolies is seen as a great obligation, as well as jobs for the boys.

The issue of intermarriage, though, would not explain why we cannot bring the stuff home and drink it around the Shabbat table, where the chances of running into a sexy non-Jewish model are sharply reduced. So we fall back again on the current fashion for extremes. As I have often said, I have no beef with those who wish to go to the most restrictive extent of religiosity. Just so long as they do not try to impose it on everyone else, as if it were the only option.

Wine has a very mixed history of good and bad effects. But in moderation, it oils the wheels of human interaction. We are commanded to drink it but to beware of the excess that can reduce a human being to the lowest level of animal behavior. One only has to see drunken haredi youngsters throwing up on the streets of Jerusalem, Golders Green, and Brooklyn on Purim to see how drunkenness demeans.

Sigmund Freud accused Moses of being a killjoy and imposing unreasonable restrictions. But the truth is that he and the Torah tell us to enjoy life and rejoice. It’s just that one also needs to be disciplined, and the Torah’s restrictions are intended to get us to think before we go too far. Sadly, even the most religious often take one and not the other.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Reggie Green

    The Haredi cult strikes again

Algemeiner.com