Tuesday, January 16th | 29 Tevet 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

December 28, 2016 1:04 pm

How Many Jewish Children Are Too Many for the New York Times, Obama?

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "How Many Jewish Children Are Too Many for the New York Times, Obama?" to a friend
The UN Security Council. Photo: Twitter

The UN Security Council. Photo: Twitter

In a lead, front-page news article headlined “Defying U.N., Israel Prepares to Build More Settlements,” the New York Times conveys an explanation for the United States failure to veto an anti-Israel resolution at the United Nations Security Council.

“The addition of more than 100,000 settlers during Mr. Obama’s tenure convinced him that it was time to change the approach at the United Nations, aides said,” the Times reports. The Times doesn’t identify who these “aides” were or otherwise explain why limiting Jewish population growth in the West Bank is a project worthy of presidential attention

A deeper look at some of the math in the Times article makes Obama’s action seem even more peculiar. The Times reports:

In 2009, the year Mr. Obama took office, 297,000 people lived in West Bank settlements and 193,737 in East Jerusalem. That increased to 386,000 in the West Bank by the end of last year and 208,000 in East Jerusalem by the end of 2014, according to Peace Now, a group that opposes settlements.

The math doesn’t work. The number 386,000 minus 297,000 is not “more than 100,000,” as the Times or the unnamed “aides” say. It is 89,000, or “less than 90,000.”

As for the East Jerusalem residents, their 7.3% population growth rate over the 2009 to 2014 period was lower than Israel’s overall population growth rate of 10.5% during the same period. The Times omits that context.

Also omitted by the Times is the growth of the Palestinian Authority’s population. The Times quotes the Obama “aides” complaining about “[t]he addition of more than 100,000 settlers” — but it doesn’t mention at all that in the same period, the Palestinian Authority’s Arab population in the West Bank and Gaza grew by a reported 747,218 people, according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics.

What other numbers might put the “100,000 settlers” in context? Well, there are the 3,743 persons killed in anti-Israel terrorism, or the tens of thousands of Israelis killed in wars waged by the Arabs who refused to accept Israel’s existence. Or the six million Jews killed in the Holocaust, a demographic disaster from which world Jewry has yet to recover, and one made possible, in part, precisely because of the British 1939 White Paper policy of limiting Jewish immigration to Israel so as not to throw off the demographic status quo balance with the Arabs. Sound familiar?

Nor does the Times attempt to explain how much of the growth in the number of settlers results from migration — Israelis moving from one side of the Green Line to another — and how much results from childbirth, or Israelis who already live in settlements having more children. If the issue that so disturbs President Obama is that the Jewish mothers and fathers of East Jerusalem are having too many children, maybe he wants to propose a solution rather than simply allow the United Nations Security Council to condemn the newborns? What’s his answer? An old-fashioned Chinese Communist-style one-child policy, with state-enforced abortions? Making like the Egyptian Pharaoh and drowning the newborn Jewish children? And if “100,000” additional Jews is too many, what is an acceptable number of Jewish children to Mr. Obama? Are Jews in the Jewish quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City, in Ariel, in Efrat, in Gilo, in Maale Adumim, in Modiin Illit supposed to check with President Obama, or Secretary of State Kerry, for a permission slip before getting pregnant?

The Times doesn’t probe any of these questions. The editors and reporters there may not even know anyone who might pose them, or, if they do, they don’t deem them worth including in the story. This isn’t to say that Israel must retain every inch of the West Bank forever, or that there isn’t some possible American policy interest in making a future Palestinian state geographically viable. It’s simply to say that the Times is committing bad journalism here by failing to question the Obama administration’s assumptions or put them in context. When reporters and editors convey to readers the opinions of anonymous “aides” without subjecting their ideas to even a modicum of skepticism, the reporters and editors are engaging in stenography, or propaganda, not journalism. Definitions aside, the Times reporters and editors aren’t providing readers much useful help in putting the news in perspective or context. For that you need some other newspaper — like the one you are reading right now.

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here. 

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • oneyankandthey’reoff

    One presumes that once the yanks have convinced the Israelis to reverse the settlement process the descendants of white European settlers will leave the USA so they can return the land to the indigenous Americans whom they stole it from? Or is the self-styled ‘Land of the Free’ being characteristically hypocritical again?;)

  • Lia

    Mr Stoll, you are one of my all-time heroes!

  • There was never an Arab-Palestinian State in Greater Israel and there will never be – face it.
    The Ottoman land records of Palestine confirm that the Arabs did not own land, they were sharecroppers. Over 90% of the land was owned by the government the balance was owned by absentee wealthy Arabs from Lebanon who sold it to the Jews at premium prices.
    It is time to implement population transfer for all the Arabs who create violence, riot and attack Jews and anyone else. They could be relocated to the home and land of the million Jewish people, expelled from Arab countries or Jordan.
    YJ Draiman.

    Tell the Obama White House official to return occupied Texas and other states to Mexico and the rest of the United States to the Indians. Clean your own house before you interfere with other nations internal issues.
    The Jews have a history with The Land of Israel going over 4,000 years. It built two Jewish Temples in Jerusalem, etc. The Americans have only a few hundred years of occupation theft by force of land and resources and deliberate destruction of the Indians.
    YJ Draiman.

  • jankel

    If some people want absolutely to kill Jews! We have a lot of Leftiists we can make a gift of to them..?

  • watsa46

    When the other side refuses to come to the table, what are you supposed to do? When the other side is involved in terrorism as a counteroffer, what are you supposed to do?