Monday, October 23rd | 3 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 22, 2017 7:28 am

Will ‘Fewer Editors’ Improve New York Times Coverage of Jewish News?

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "Will ‘Fewer Editors’ Improve New York Times Coverage of Jewish News?" to a friend
Office of The New York Times, in New York City. Photo: WikiCommons.

The New York Times headquarters. Photo: Wiki Commons.

The top editors of the New York Times came out with a memo promising newsroom budget cuts and “fewer editors.” The Times also issued a report based on a “newsroom survey” that “we should do less coverage of incremental news.”

On the evidence of the newspaper itself, the Times has already implemented its own advice. (Though it is kind of funny, and symbolic, that the newspaper has apparently decided to reinvent itself based on interviews with its own staff, rather than with customers or potential customers).

Consider four recent highlights — or, more accurately, lowlights — of Times coverage of Jewish issues:

• A Times news article about a deadly fire in a Tehran office building reports that it was “built in 1962 by Habib Elghanian, an Iranian-Jewish businessman,” and that “[a]fter the 1979 revolution, Mr. Elghanian was accused of spying for Israel and was executed.”

Related coverage

October 22, 2017 1:22 pm
0

Israeli Government Cultivates Allies at First Christian Media Summit

JNS.org - Recognizing that it's easier to communicate with journalists who are prone to be supporters of Israel than those with a perceived anti-Israel bias, the Israeli...

The Times doesn’t say whether the accusation of spying for Israel was an accurate one or a false one. For an example of an alternative way to handle this, check out the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles: “He was falsely charged and convicted of spying for Israel.” Or:

[T]he 66-year-old Elghanian was later arrested on February 17, 1979 on trumped-up charges of spying for Israel and the United States. After several months in prison, he was given a one-hour sham trial and accused of supposed crimes against the nation of Iran and the Palestinian people. Despite the lack of evidence in his case, a three panel revolutionary court found him guilty and Elghanian was promptly executed by a firing squad on May 9, 1979.

• A dispatch from Jerusalem under the byline of the new Times bureau chief there, Ian Fisher, reports, “American policy, like that of many other nations, has long been that the future of the holy city can be determined only as part of a broader peace agreement and that putting the embassy there would prejudge the outcome.”

That may be the State Department’s policy, but it isn’t “American policy.” The “American policy” was set forth in the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, which includes the language: “Statement of the Policy of the United States,” followed by three provisions: that Jerusalem “should remain an undivided city in which the rights of every ethnic and religious group are protected;” that “Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel;” and that “the United States Embassy in Israel should be established in Jerusalem no later than May 31, 1999.”

• The Times has been on a rabid promotional kick for a writer called Ayelet Waldman, lavishing on her the sort of extended attention — a “By The Book” interview in the Sunday Book Review; a generally favorable review of her new book; and a long feature article on the front of the Sunday Style section — that it reserves only for a favored few.

The Times reports on Ms. Waldman’s use of the illegal drug LSD, saying, “Countless prescription pharmaceuticals had failed to stabilize her chronic mood disorders, including depression and Bipolar II disorder, and, more recently, her premenstrual dysphoric disorder, a particularly disabling form of premenstrual syndrome. Her tempestuous psyche, she said, was tearing apart her marriage and raising thoughts of suicide.”

Yet, none of the extensive recent Times coverage of Ms. Waldman in connection with her LSD use and her book about it mention her other career, organizing an anti-Israel book project. It’s a strange and conspicuous omission, especially since a piece of the anti-Israel book project somehow found its way into the New York Times Magazine.

• Another Times error by way of omission came in its coverage of the confirmation hearing of James Mattis as defense secretary. Numerous press outlets reported that during the hearing, Mr. Mattis identified “Tel Aviv” as the capital of Israel. Israel’s capital is Jerusalem. Yet the Times news article about the confirmation hearing failed to include any account of the “Tel Aviv” comment.

Will “fewer editors” improve the problems with the Times journalism? It’s hard to predict. What can be safely said is that even with the number of editors the paper has now, there’s more than plenty of room for improvement.

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here. 

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Isahiah62

    Will ‘Fewer Editors’ Improve New York Times Coverage of Jewish News?

    SHORT ANSWER: NO
    NY SLIMES lying for LEFT since 1922 …Duranty lied for Stalin. And of course Stalin blamed the Jews for the famine- a lie STILL believed and parroted by LEFTIES, neonazis and other jewhaters today.

  • Joseph Feld

    Nothing much seems to have changed at ‘All the News that is Fit to Print’. The founders were German Reform Jews who went out of their way to minimise Jewish issues like the Holocaust and to take positions that tried to be more Gentile than the Gentiles. The original ‘Times’ here in London makes a good effort to offer a range of informed opinions and the NY Times could learn from The Times.

  • robert Davis

    …in favour of Israel and as usual the nyt will reject them. Then the authors can complain to President Trump so he can fine that rotten, antisemite paper.

  • robert Davis

    The nyt is a TOTALLY ROTTEN FRUIT and cannot be saved, it must be destroyed with huge fines until it gets bust. People should send out editor letters in fato the nyt

  • Michael Garfinkel

    Elise Labott of CNN, who was suspended for two weeks in 2015 for tweeting “House passes bill that could limit Syrian refugees. Statue of Liberty bows head in anguish” has been all over that network similarly mischaracterizing the status of Jerusalem.

    Labott made no mention of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, and (almost) surprisingly, none of the pundits on CNN made mention of this either.

  • Mr_Cohen

    This quote is from The Abandonment of the Jews by David S. Wyman:

    Popular concern for Europe’s Jews could not develop without wide-spread knowledge of what was happening to them. But the information gap, though extremely important, was not the only limiting factor.

    Strong currents of anti-Semitism and nativism in American society also diminished the possibilities for a sympathetic response. A quieter, more prevalent prejudice, a “passive anti-Semitism,” was another major barrier to the growth of concern.

    It was reflected in opinion surveys taken by the [USA] Office of War Information. They showed that the impact of atrocity information on the average American was SEVEN TIMES STRONGER when it involved atrocities-in-general, than when it referred specifically to atrocities against Jews.

    SOURCE:
    The Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust 1941-1945 (chapter 16, page 327) by David S. Wyman, year 1984 CE, Pantheon Books, New York, ISBN: 9780394428130, 0394428137, 9780394740775, 0394740777.

  • Peter Joffe

    The NYT are antisemitic false news reporters. They are the trash of the world with their hatred and disinformation. Close them down as they have no decent contribution to make to society as is the case with CNN. With NYT and CNN nothing is good and if it is it is not reported.

  • Hard Little Machine

    It will only make things worse. Fewer people to sanity check their hate speech.

Algemeiner.com