Friday, July 28th | 5 Av 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 12, 2017 1:20 pm

New York Times Demonstrates ‘Ultra-Bad’ Journalism About Israeli Politics

avatar by Ira Stoll

Email a copy of "New York Times Demonstrates ‘Ultra-Bad’ Journalism About Israeli Politics" to a friend

Israel’s parliament, the Knesset. Photo: Itzik Edri via Wikimedia Commons.

Just days after hurling the adjective “nationalist” at the political party of Israel’s defense minister — and coming in for criticism from The Algemeiner for doing so — the New York Times is upping the ante, with a news article describing the minister, Avigdor Lieberman, as “ultra-nationalist.”

The Times offers no explanation about what exactly crosses the line from merely “nationalist” to “ultra-nationalist,” or why a politician described as merely one a few days ago deserves a promotion, or demotion, to the more extreme category a few days later.

Nor is that the only oddity in this Times article, which reports on the election of Avi Gabbay as the chairman of Israel’s Labor Party. The Times describes Labor as “the political home of state builders like David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin,” and reports further that Labor has “always been identified with the old Ashkenazic elite who hailed from Europe.”

Related coverage

July 28, 2017 11:04 am
0

The Ninth of Av: A Guide for the Perplexed

Here are nine thoughts on the Ninth of Av: 1. Forgetfulness feeds oblivion; remembrance breeds deliverance. According to a legend, Napoleon was walking one night in...

This is an odd formulation. Rabin was born in Israel. Meir was a Milwaukee public school teacher whose father worked in a railroad yard. Not exactly some European ”elite.” The first prime minister from Labor’s rival, the Likud Party, Menachem Begin, was born in Europe. So was the second Likud prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir, and the party’s ideological progenitor, Vladimir (Ze’ev) Jabotinsky.

The “has always been identified” trick is the Times using the passive voice to put its own spin on the story. Who is doing the identifying? The Times doesn’t say, but the reality is it is the Times itself. The paper is using its own voice to portray Israelis as European colonizers of the Middle East, neglecting to mention that the only reason the Jews were in Europe to begin with was that the Romans — that is, invading Europeans — had invaded Israel, sacked Jerusalem, and forced the Jews to flee their native land. The Jews only “hailed from Europe” in the most temporary of senses; they prayed facing Jerusalem, mentioned it in their daily prayers, and annually mourned the anniversary of their exile.

What can one say about this treatment from the Times? One might call it bad journalism, or bad history. But that might even be too generous. If one were to treat the Times the way the Times treats Israel, one might write that the Times has “always been identified with ultra-bad journalism.”

More of Ira Stoll’s media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.

 

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • larryx

    each news site has its agenda and the NYT is no exception: it wants a more liberal Israel.

    Shame the NYT used to be a great paper.

  • yael58

    The New York Times: All Anti Israel All the Time

  • robert Davis

    The nyt and its founder were antisemites from the start and their “arguments” are crap and pr : nationalism has always existed because it’s simply the most common way to defend a nation. Even when nations as we know them did not exist during the Middle Ages when they were replaced by monarchy the Kings made a Policy based 90% on nationalism and only 10% their family. Even socialism which supports a much worse hegemony ends up in nationalism ie nazism. US “liberals” are not liberal at all they are socialists and LIARS as all other socialists. They are afraid of small preventive wars which would not lead the people to socialism but they are not afraid of world wars which could bring the whole world to socialism.

  • SAWolf

    “Bad journalism”, call it what it is, hatred of Jews.

  • Hilltop Watchman

    By the New York Sturmer’s own logic, surely almost all “Americans” are European or African and should go back to their own countries. But let’s not let a few facts get in the way of a good story, eh.

Algemeiner.com