Thursday, November 23rd | 5 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 17, 2017 11:04 am

Taxpayer Support for Palestinian Terrorist Salaries Becoming Impossible to Defend

avatar by Edwin Black

Email a copy of "Taxpayer Support for Palestinian Terrorist Salaries Becoming Impossible to Defend" to a friend

US President Donald Trump and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Bethlehem on May 23, 2017. Photo: The White House.

The subject of government subsidies for Palestinian terrorists is again in the international spotlight. What began in November 2013, as a barely believable revelation — that taxpayers in Great Britain, the US, and other Western nations were bankrolling terrorist salaries — has now become a universally-acknowledged, impossible-to-deny, and impossible-to-defend embarrassment for governments.

For years, Western officials have dissembled and dodged when the question came up. After a period of silent disbelief, the mainstream media now openly confirms that salaries are paid to terrorists, and routinely refers to the program with ipso factuality. Yet as more citizens are victimized in Great Britain, Europe, the US and elsewhere, Western donor governments now find that their financial involvement with the Palestinian Authority terrorist salary program is increasingly indefensible.

Whether things might be changing is anyone’s guess.

In November 2013, revelations first leapt into global headlines that convicted Palestinian terrorists were receiving monthly salaries from the Palestinian Authority — which they paid using foreign donor funds. The Palestinian “Law of the Prisoner” openly rewards those convicted of even the most heinous attacks with generous monthly “salaries,” and phantom jobs with automatic advancement in the PA government.

Related coverage

November 23, 2017 1:51 pm
0

Sadat and Begin: The Peacemakers

It has been 38 years since the signing of the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty, most famously evoked by the three-way handshake on...

The salaries increase on a sliding scale: the more carnage inflicted and the longer the prisoner sentence, the higher the salary. Terrorists receiving a five-year sentence are granted just a few hundred dollars each month. The bloodiest murderers are paid as much $3,000 monthly. Checks are sent directly to the prisoner, who appoints someone to distribute the funds.

In 2013, the salary program operated by the Ministry of Prisoners was estimated to consume some $5 to $8 million monthly, with other benefit programs doubling that sum. In all, some 8 percent of the PA budget was diverted to terror. But that money was the tip of the cash pile.

The chronically bankrupt PA relies upon foreign aid to pay the salaries. and puts foreign funds into the salary program before any civic expenditures on health, welfare, education, or infrastructure programs. In every Western country, financial support for terrorism makes such funding illegal. Yet, the UK, EU, and the US, through their fungible aid, effectively act as the chief bankers of the terrorist salaries.

There have been thin attempts by government paymasters in various countries to portray the monies not as “salaries” but as “welfare.” Ironically, the PA itself vigorously refuted that claim, bragging that such payments are proud rewards to its cherished fighters, including the type of terrorist that would slash the throat of children in their kibbutz beds. Indeed, the term for the payments is rawatib, which in Arabic does not mean “welfare” — it means “salaries.”

Shortly after the 2013 disclosures, US Congressman Trent Franks of the House Terrorism, Non-Proliferation, and Trade Subcommittee became one of the first to grasp the implications. He scheduled a formal hearing on the topic and loudly demanded that Washington cut all foreign aid to the PA. Yet American foreign aid payments amount to roughly $400 million per year.

Likewise, in February 2014, after a House of Commons presentation, key British MPs insisted that London halt the roughly £70 to £90 million that it donates annually to the PA. A formal hearing in the Canadian House of Commons and a session in the European Parliament yielded a similar outrage among a few key legislators.

But most other US, UK and Canadian legislators were incredulous and felt that the disclosures could not be true — and no change occurred.

But in mid-June 2014, a late-night compromise in the US Congress resulted in an unpublicized fiscal 2015 budget reduction in aid to the PA. The last-minute insertion reduced “the amount of assistance … for the Palestinian Authority by an amount … equivalent to … payments to individuals and the families of such individuals that are imprisoned for acts of terrorism or who died committing such acts during the previous calendar year.”

Seeing $60 million or more disappearing from its coffers, the PA abolished the governmental Ministry of Prisoners, and began funneling the cash through an outside Palestine Liberation Organization agency known as the “Prisoners Authority.” The Prisoners Authority reports directly to PA President Mahmoud Abbas. Notably, the PA itself is subordinate to the PLO.

A transparent re-routing of the same funding of terrorist salaries drawn from taxpayer funds changed nothing for taxpayers. Throughout 2015 and 2016, major media confirmations in the Daily MailThe TelegraphWall Street Journal and many other publications belatedly confirmed what Jewish and pro-Israel groups had been calling out since 2013.

An exploding universe of researchers, activists, NGOs and Israeli officials joined the fray. These included Palestinian Media Watch, StandWithUs and NGO Monitor. Each added a disclosure, study, or proof point to the case.

In February 2015, a rare media intervention lawsuit (similar to a Freedom of Information Act request, but directed at private litigation) secured some 5,000 pages of US court-sealed PLO terror salary documents. The files proved that senior PA officials — including President Abbas himself — scrutinized the details of the acts that terrorists committed before approving monthly salaries. PA leaders could no longer distance themselves from the salary program.

The first tectonic shift came in March 2016 at the AIPAC annual policy conference in Washington, D.C. During the run-up to the conference, numerous pro-Israel groups, led by StandWithUs, reminded US politicians and candidates that terrorist salaries must be opposed. Their efforts paid off. Hour after hour, every candidate’s speech, from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, loudly proclaimed that the PA had to stop rewarding terrorists. From that moment on, the mumble and grumble became a public roar.

In September 2016, a group of leading Republicans introduced the Taylor Force Act, named for the 28-year-old Texas student who was killed by a terrorist while in Israel. The proposed legislation, which is still stuck in committee, would terminate all PA funding if payment of terrorist salaries continues. The measure has been a rallying call for pro-Jewish groups.

A second jolt occurred in October 2016, when British International Development Secretary Priti Patel briefly halted £25 million in aid to the PA, conceding that it may have gone to pay terrorist salaries — a conclusion he previously denied. Yet funding quickly resumed with the PA assurance that only regular PA employees would be paid. Ironically, many of the thousands of staffers on the PA’s employment payrolls hold phantom jobs awarded to convicted terrorists who are still sitting in Israeli prisons.

On November 1, 2016, just a week before the American election, former Israel intelligence officer Yossi Kuperwasser put all the numbers together for the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He documented that the salaries, plus “martyr” payments to families of terrorists, plus regular terror bonuses,  had increased to $300 million per year. In the nearly four years since the original 2013 disclosures, the PA had spent a stunning one billion dollars on terror. In 2016, nearly 30 percent of all foreign money received was diverted to the cause of terror.

Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, recently called a press conference at the UN displaying a large poster declaring: “The Palestinian Authority has paid a $1,000,000,000 to terrorists.” Yet the true number actually exceeds one billion dollars if other diversions from education, sports and security funds are tallied.

On May 3, 2017, President Trump met with President Abbas. According to a White House statement, “President Trump raised his concerns about payments to Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails who have committed terrorist acts, and to their families, and emphasized the need to resolve this issue.”

On May 26, 2017, Norway’s Foreign Minister learned that a women’s center that it funded in the PA territories was named for a notorious terrorist who massacred a bus full of passengers. Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende declared, “The glorification of terrorist attacks is completely unacceptable.” He demanded the money be repaid.

On June 3, 2017, 277 recently-released Hamas terrorists publicly complained that their salaries had been suspended to appease the Trump administration. Soon, Iran stepped in to provide a special subvention. Two days later, Kuperwasser published an analysis suggesting that the PA may at last be genuinely backing away from the salary program as a concession to Washington. But since, then, Palestinian public opinion, agitation by the Palestinian quasi-NGO “Prisoner’s Club” and other public pressures has caused Abbas to openly deny that the PA will ever stop paying prisoner salaries. When Trump senior advisor Jared Kushner met with Abbas in Ramallah on June 21, the session reportedly blew up over terrorist salaries. Abbas vehemently refused to curtail the payments.

As recently as July 2, Abbas publicly proclaimed: “Even if I will have to leave my position, I will not compromise on the salary (rawatib) of a Martyr (Shahid) or a prisoner.”

The next chapter in the saga of taxpayer-funded terrorism will be written by the policymakers of governmental paymasters — undoubtedly in blood.

Edwin Black is the New York bestselling author of IBM and the Holocaust, and Financing the Flames, which in November 2013 broke the terrorist salaries story worldwide. He filed suit to obtain some 5,000 court-sealed PA terror salary documents, and has testified or presented on the subject in five national legislatures.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com