Sunday, May 20th | 6 Sivan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

February 13, 2018 3:25 pm

Israeli Police Recommend Bribery Charges Against Netanyahu

avatar by Reuters and Algemeiner Staff

Email a copy of "Israeli Police Recommend Bribery Charges Against Netanyahu" to a friend

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting at the Prime Minister’s office in Jerusalem January 7, 2018. REUTERS/Abir Sultan/Pool/File Photo.

Israeli police on Tuesday recommended indicting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bribery in two criminal investigations but the Israeli leader, calling the allegations baseless, vowed to remain in office.

Now deep in a cloud of uncertainty over his political future, the right-wing leader will await a final decision by Israel’s attorney-general on whether he will face charges, a process that could take weeks or even months.

The recommendations, which police made public on Tuesday night, were at the more serious end of the range of charges that had been expected to be leveled against Netanyahu, now in his fourth term. The investigations have gone on for more than a year.

One of the cases, known as Case 1000, alleges the “committing of crimes of bribery, fraud and breach of trust by the prime minister, Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu.”

Related coverage

May 18, 2018 12:01 pm

Israel Should Be ‘Commended’ for Saving Palestinian Lives on Gaza Border, Former UK Military Commander Tells UN Meeting

A former commander of British military forces in Afghanistan told the UN Human Rights Council on Friday that IDF troops...

In a detailed statement, police named Arnon Milchan, a Hollywood producer and Israeli citizen, and Australian businessman James Packer, saying that they “over years awarded gifts of various types,” including champagne, cigars and jewelry to Netanyahu and his family.

In all, the gifts were worth more than one million shekels ($280,000), the statement said.

Netanyahu’s lawyers have said the presents were simply tokens of friendship and no quid pro quo was given.

The second, Case 2000, also alleges “bribery, fraud and breach of trust by the prime minister” and by the publisher of the biggest-selling Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, Arnon Mozes. The two men, police say, discussed ways of slowing the growth of a rival daily newspaper, Israel Hayom, “through legislation and other means”.

Netanyahu, who denies wrongdoing, has been questioned several times by police since the start of 2017.

In a televised address from his Jerusalem residence just minutes after police made public their recommendations, Netanyahu said he had never sought personal gain in his public service.

Against the backdrop of Israeli flags, he spoke in somber tones as he recounted his days as an Israeli commando and reaffirmed his commitment to Israel’s security.

“I will continue to lead Israel responsibly and faithfully for as long as you, the citizens of Israel choose me to lead you,” he said. “I am certain, I am certain, that the truth will be revealed, and I am certain that at the next elections, which will be held on schedule, I will earn your trust again, with God’s help.”

Israel is next scheduled to go to the polls in late 2019.

“Because I know the truth, I tell you … things will end in nothing,” Netanyahu said.


Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • LtcHoward

    The Syrians, Hezbollah, the Iranians, threaten Israel and the charge is too many cigars and too much champagne as gifts to the prime minister.

    The Israeli left must be suicidal.

    The charge that Sarah Netanyahu should have used the kitchen rather than the restaurants is ludicrous. Having served in every White House beginning with John F. Kennedy I can testify that there is a tremendous amount of household expense engaged in by every president that all of us taxpayers would regard as exorbitant and frivolous.

    No matter what the editorial discussion was there was no way that the Prime Minister could deliver readership to or limit circulation of any newspaper.