Monday, October 3rd | 8 Tishri 5783

July 27, 2018 10:44 am

David’s Sling Fizzled, But Better to Learn That Now

avatar by Yoav Limor /


A David’s Sling system test in December 2015. Photo: United States Missile Defense Agency.

JNS.orgIt is well-known that investigations launched by the ‎Israeli Air Force are like no other: They are swift, ‎thorough, and leave no stone unturned. Those ‎participating in them know that they must be completely ‎honest about mistakes, because it is the only ‎way for the IAF to learn and improve. After all, ‎human lives are at stake.‎

The IAF will undoubtedly live up to this reputation when it ‎investigates what went wrong with the operational debut of the David’s Sling air-defense system on ‎Monday, when the system fired two interceptors at errant ‎Syrian missiles. The missiles were launched as part ‎of the war between Syrian President Bashar Assad’s ‎army and rebel forces in southwest Syria, but ‎threatened to breach Israeli airspace, prompting ‎David’s Sling into action.‎

It would take a systematic review to figure out what ‎went wrong, but even now it is clear that the ‎system, which was unable to hit its targets, ‎suffered a serious operational and technological ‎failure. ‎

To the credit of the team operating the David’s ‎Sling battery deployed near the Israel-Syria border, ‎the challenge they faced on Monday was highly ‎complicated.

Related coverage

October 2, 2022 11:25 am

Women’s Rights in the Middle East: Iranian Oppression and Israeli Progression

Last month, a young woman was allegedly murdered by the Iranian regime in part for the crime of showing her...

The projectiles launched from Syria were Russian-made ‎OTR-21 Tochka missiles — tactical ballistic missiles ‎whose trajectory profile differs greatly from other ‎missiles. This may be why the IAF’s radars ‎identified them as a threat, triggering ‎air-raid sirens in the country’s north and ‎subsequently David’s Sling.‎

The system’s designers will most likely review ‎whether the apparatus can be calibrated more accurately to ‎prevent false launches in the future, but that’s ‎the easy part. The hard part of this investigation ‎will delve into the operational decision-making process on ‎the ground, which led to the order to launch David’s ‎Sling interceptors for the very first time, only to ‎have them miss their targets. ‎

The problem here is not the waste of resources — ‎each interceptor costs $1 million — but the ‎issue of their failure. Other than their ‎intrinsic role, air-defense systems are supposed to ‎generate deterrence; to make the enemy think twice ‎before launching an offensive that they know is doomed to ‎fail.‎ One must remember that David’s Sling, which counters medium- to long-range ‎projectiles, was designed to fend off ‎Hezbollah’s extensive rocket and missile arsenal. ‎

The upside to Monday’s incident is that no harm was ‎done on either side of the border. The Syrian ‎missiles did not breach Israeli airspace and the ‎Israeli missiles landed in an open area on the ‎Syrian side of the border. ‎

The downside is that David’s Sling, which was ‎declared operational in April, is clearly not ready ‎for deployment. It still has to undergo some ‎improvements before it can meet the challenge of ‎defending a sector brimming with volatile ballistic ‎threats.‎

The IAF’s investigation should also see whether the ‎Air Defense Command was perhaps too eager to employ ‎David’s Sling. Striving to engage the enemy is a ‎welcome trait, but it doesn’t come without risk. ‎

Luckily, Monday’s failure took no toll on the ‎ground, but it is doubtful that failure was what the ‎Air Defense Command ‎had in mind with respect to ‎‎the ‎system’s operational debut.

Yoav Limor is a veteran Israeli journalist and columnist for Israel Hayom.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.