Wednesday, October 5th | 10 Tishri 5783

October 23, 2018 9:41 am

A Jordanian Move Spells Weakness ‎

avatar by Eyal Zisser / Israel Hayom /


Jordanian King Abdullah II. Photo: Reuters / Kayhan Ozer / Pool. –  The late Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin saw the 1994 peace ‎treaty with Jordan as one of his most important ‎diplomatic achievements, if not the most important ‎one. Unlike the skepticism he expressed over the ‎Oslo Accords and then-PLO chairman Yasser Arafat’s commitment to them, ‎Rabin was sure that Jordan’s King Hussein would live up to his ‎word. ‎

There is something symbolic in the ‎fact that on the anniversary of Rabin’s assassination according to the Hebrew calendar, current Jordanian King Abdullah ‎announced that he would not renew one of the annexes ‎his father signed 24 years ago, leasing agricultural ‎borderlands to Israel.‎

The Jordanian announcement is neither a big surprise, ‎nor a move that has far-reaching strategic ‎significance. After all, these are Jordanian ‎lands, and it stands to reason that Jordan would have ‎reimposed its sovereignty over them at some point, ‎as no country in the Middle East would ever agree to ‎relinquish territories over time. ‎

Saudi Arabia did the same with respect to the Tiran ‎and Sanafir islands, which were administered by ‎Egypt for years before Riyadh reimposed its ‎sovereignty over them ‎in 2017.‎

Related coverage

October 4, 2022 11:22 am

Events at Berkeley Law Demonstrate a Campus Crisis on Antisemitism

For all their righteous words about diversity and inclusion, some university administrators are finding creative ways to justify the exclusion...

The problem, therefore, is not the move per se, ‎but the manner and timing with which the Jordanians ‎chose to declare they were essentially disavowing ‎the spirit of the 1994 peace agreement and turning ‎their backs on the partnership forged between Rabin ‎and Hussein.‎

This was not a complete surprise. After all, the ‎Jordanians are very hostile towards Israel compared ‎to populations in other Arab countries ‎and, regrettably, the Jordanian regime does not even ‎try to deal with this hostility. Facing a myriad of domestic ‎challenges, the regime prefers to allow public opinion to lash ‎out at Israel and hopes this will soften the ‎criticism leveled at it on other issues.‎

At the same time, no Arab country is as dependent on Israel as Jordan, certainly in ‎terms of energy and water resources, and on questions ‎of national security. ‎

Moreover, no Arab state maintains such ‎tight, albeit clandestine, strategic cooperation ‎with Israel as Jordan does. Israel welcomes this ‎cooperation; its importance is immeasurably ‎greater than the acres of agricultural land over ‎which Jordan now seeks to regain control. ‎

Overall, this is not a move that truly harms ‎Israel’s interests, which is why Jerusalem is showing ‎patience towards the hostile winds blowing ‎in its direction from Jordan. ‎

Nevertheless, the Jordanian move is as much a show ‎of Abdullah’s weakness as signing the peace ‎deal was a show of his father’s strength. ‎Israel should maintain the same strategic ‎cooperation with Jordan as it always has; still, ‎our eyes have been opened.

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.