Wednesday, June 16th | 6 Tammuz 5781

December 25, 2018 8:19 am

Trump’s Retreat from Syria Will Cause the Region to Combust

avatar by Sarah N. Stern /


US Defense Secretary James Mattis listens as President Donald Trump speaks to the news media while gathering for a briefing from his senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington, DC, Oct. 23, 2018. Photo: Reuters / Leah Millis.

JNS.orgEver since World War II, the United States has had a foreign policy that supports its democratic allies and friends, and opposes its enemies. In a simplistic tweet, Donald Trump has reversed this sound, longstanding American policy.

The critically important tweet read: “We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump presidency.”

This is perhaps the most ruinous idea for the region since Obama’s 2015 Iranian nuclear deal. Both ideas have emboldened, enriched, and empowered Iran — the greatest regional threat not just to Israel, but to the United States, which is patently apparent in the regime’s hostile rhetoric.

Both ideas, along with President Barack Obama’s unenforced “red line” in Syria, have created a power vacuum, where not only Iran but America’s other adversaries and potential enemies, such as Russia under Vladmir Putin, the regime of Bashar Assad, and Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdogan, have swooped in to fill the void.

Related coverage

June 16, 2021 12:07 pm

We Must Stop US Funds From Indoctrinating Palestinian Children

In the realms of domestic and foreign policy, the Biden administration has made a concerted effort to reverse many of...

If America is not there on the ground, it will not have a seat at the table regarding the potential outcome of the Syrian civil war.

Trump’s precipitous exit can only come from someone who lacks even the most fundamental understanding of the nature of the Middle East, as well as the psychology of some of its actors. ISIS might be nearly defeated in its present form, but the struggle for the members of ISIS and other radical Islamic groups is a passionate, ideological one. They might suffer a temporary defeat in battle, but they are convinced that they will eventually win the war.

Much like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt that went underground under Mubarak — only to reemerge under Mohamed Morsi — ISIS is likely to re-incarnate itself and emerge in a stronger form, such as the Al-Nusra Front.

Beyond ISIS (in whatever future incarnation it might decide to take), there is an entire array of complex threats in the region that will emanate from Syrian borders, which include but are not limited to Iran, with its proxy organizations the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Hezbollah. These nefarious forces are becoming more and more entrenched in southern Syria, and are now as far south as Quinetra. Bearing in mind that earlier this month, Iran conducted a medium-range ballistic-missile test that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said “is capable of carrying multiple warheads,” this leaves Israel totally exposed on its northern border.

I have often argued that there should be synergy between our foreign policy, and what is ethical and right. America has always been, hitherto now, a moral beacon — or as President Ronald Reagan called it, “That shining city on the Hill.”

Moral beacons do not desert their friends.

What sort of message does this send to our friends in the region? We will be throwing the Kurds, our allies who have shed their blood together with us defeating ISIS, to the wolves. How does that make our other allies in other troubled regions of the world feel? What incentive would there be for other nations, such as Japan or South Korea, to trust us and want to ally themselves with us?

Throughout American history, there has been a familiar cycle of such isolationist tendencies. All of these have been like waving a rare, sizzling steak to the voracious, hungry dogs in the region.

One such example was the America First Committee, founded prior to World War II by Charles Lindbergh. In 1941, he said, “When history is written, the responsibility for the downfall of the democracies of Europe will rest squarely upon the shoulders of the interventionists who led their nations into war, uninformed and unprepared.”

As Franklin Roosevelt said in response to this tendency: “Some indeed still hold to the now somewhat obvious delusion that we of the United States can safely permit the United States to become a lone island, a lone island in a world dominated by the philosophy of force. Such an island may be the dream of those who still talk and vote as isolationists. Such an island represents to me and to the overwhelming majority of Americans today a helpless nightmare, the helpless nightmare of a people without freedom; yes, the nightmare of a people lodged in prison, handcuffed, hungry, and fed through the bars from day to day by the contemptuous, un-pitying masters of other continents.”

In the age of globalism and medium- to long-range nuclear missiles, there simply are no safe islands we can retreat to. We should avoid the seductive impulse to flee from minor battles in the region. For by doing so, we will only pave the way for a much wider regional war.

Sarah N. Stern is founder and president of the Endowment for Middle East truth, EMET, an unabashedly pro-Israel and pro-American think tank and policy institute in Washington, DC.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.