Monday, March 18th | 11 Adar II 5779

Subscribe
January 28, 2019 9:16 am

Why Does Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Prefer to Stay Silent?

avatar by Oded Granot / JNS.org

Email a copy of "Why Does Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Prefer to Stay Silent?" to a friend

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah addresses an April 15 election rally in the Bekaa Valley via a video link. Photo: Reuters / Aziz Taher.

JNS.orgAfter a notable absence that lasted for more than two months — and crazy rumors that he was stricken with cancer and might already have passed away — Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah made an appearance Saturday night on Lebanon’s Al Mayadeen television, looking very much like himself.

Truthfully, it must be said that the leader’s public appearance, his tone, and his familiar body language did not seem to support the conclusion to which one Saudi media pundit jumped somewhat hastily — that it was a double.

On the other hand, there is no doubt that the interview itself, like the hysterical promotional campaign for the speech that ran on Al Mayadeen, whose owner is a close friend of Nasrallah’s, had one goal: to prove that Nasrallah is alive, kicking, and in control.

Someone up top in Hezbollah realized that the silence of more than two months by someone who had gotten his supporters accustomed to frequent speeches could be doing damage. There are plenty of reasons to assume that if that consideration hadn’t been factored in, Nasrallah would have preferred to keep quiet for as long as possible. Developments in the region and in his own circle in the past few months are inconvenient for him, and it’s hard for even a skilled speaker such as he to explain away what is inconvenient.

Related coverage

March 18, 2019 10:12 am
0

The US Withdrawal From Afghanistan Is Dangerous, But Could It End Well?

The US decision to withdraw about 7,000 troops from Afghanistan in the coming months seems to go against recent developments...

First, Israel exposed his tunnels. This was nothing less than a public humiliation for the strategy of Hezbollah, which had hoped the project would stay off anyone’s radar. How can it explain the fact that its operatives — who under UN Resolution 1701 are not supposed to be in South Lebanon — are digging attack tunnels under the border into Israeli territory, when any scenario of war between the two countries would see Lebanon razed to the ground? “Nasrallah is dragging all of Lebanon into a dark tunnel,” his critics said.

On Saturday, the Hezbollah leader made a valiant effort to minimize the tunnels issue, calling it “a matter that was blown out of proportion” and “only a minor element that would help Hezbollah in its overall plan to conquer the Galilee.” He mocked the IDF, which “took so long to expose the tunnels.” Not a word about the intelligence that allowed Israel to reveal the secret.

These are difficult days for Nasrallah. Iran, Hezbollah’s sponsor, is becoming increasingly isolated in the world. The US sanctions and the economic crisis in Iran have already hurt the financial assistance Tehran provides to Nasrallah, and it also seems that Iranian military aid to Hezbollah will keep running up against Israel’s determination to thwart it at any price.

During his protracted silence, Nasrallah was betting that his fortunes would improve. Donald Trump announced that US forces would be leaving Syria, and apparently by accident added that Iran would now be able to do whatever it wanted in Syria. The Russians expressed open dissatisfaction with Israel’s ongoing strikes on Iranian and Hezbollah targets in Syria, and a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry called them an attack on the sovereignty of a foreign nation.

But in the meantime, there has been an upheaval. Trump is seriously considering leaving an important American base in place in al-Tanf, where the Iraqi, Syrian, and Jordanian borders meet. And Russia’s deputy foreign minister, in stark contrast to what the ministry’s spokeswoman said, told CNN that Russia’s ties with Iran could not be considered an “alliance,” and moreover, that Russia is not dismissing the importance of Israel’s security.

Nasrallah might have preferred to keep quiet, but circumstances dictated otherwise. It won’t be long before he goes back to the same old threats.

Hezbollah, he says, has no interest in launching a war, but will respond without proportion if Israel attacks targets in Lebanon. He is also saying something new: that Hezbollah will respond if Israel attacks Hezbollah targets in Syria; that Hezbollah has precision missiles ready for the next conflict; that he is warning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against making the mistake of a military gambit to “promote himself in the election campaign”; and threatening that in the next war “all Palestine will be under threat.”

For that, he didn’t need to break his silence.

Oded Granot is a journalist and international commentator on the Middle East.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com