Protests Could Prompt New Democratic Revolutions in the Gulf
The past eight years have not been particularly kind to the Gulf counter-revolution. Its one success, Egypt, has produced some of the harshest repression in the country’s history.
The Saudi and UAE intervention in Yemen has sparked one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises, tarnished the image of the two Gulf states, and provided an opportunity for Iran to expand its network of regional proxies.
In a twist of irony, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt, which justify the Yemen war by pointing to an invitation by the internationally recognized exile government of President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi, support the rebel forces of Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar in Libya.
Haftar’s forces are poised to march on Tripoli, the seat of the UN-recognized government of Libya, two weeks after the he met with King Salman in Saudi Arabia. The fighting in Libya has turned into a proxy war between Gulf rivals, with Qatar supporting the Islamist-dominated Tripoli government.
In Syria, rivals Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, which exacerbated the country’s eight-year long, devastating civil war by backing rival rebel forces, are back to square one: the man they wanted to remove from office, President Bashar al-Assad, has gained the upper hand with the support of Russia and Iran.
The recent protests in Algeria and Sudan suggest that the social, economic, and political grievances that fueled the 2011 protests continue to hover just below the surface in a swath of land that stretches from the Atlantic coast of Africa to the Gulf.
As in 2011, protests in the Middle East are not isolated incidents but the most dramatic part of a global wave prompted by a loss of public confidence in leaders and political systems that has sparked anti-government demonstrations in countries as far flung as Zimbabwe and Haiti.
The Algerian and Sudanese protests come on the back of a wave of smaller political and socio-economic protests since 2011, which suggests that the Middle Eastern counterrevolution amounted to putting a lid on a pot that could boil over at any moment. Protests have erupted in recent years in a host of countries, including Iraq, Morocco, Jordan, Lebanon, and Tunisia.
The protests also suggest the fragility of hopes of Middle Eastern autocrats that China’s model of successfully growing the economy, creating jobs and opportunity, and delivering public goods coupled with increased political control and suppression of rights would prove to be a sustainable model in their own backyards.
The fragility of the model is enhanced by the tendency of autocrats either to overreach in ways that distract from their core goals, or to pursue objectives like the creation of a “new man” that ultimately failed in countries like Turkey.
Turkey’s Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) has been in power for the better part of two decades. Its success suggests that the effort to create a secular New Turk by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the visionary who carved modern Turkey out of the ruins of the Ottoman Empire almost a century ago, has stumbled.
Egyptian general-turned president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have taken control and civilizationalism to new extremes by seeking not only absolute political power, but also the ability to shape culture and dictate personal behavior.
Sisi recently ordered his officials to dictate the themes and scripts of Egyptian soap operas, a popular regional staple, particularly during the holy month of Ramadan. A military-linked production company has taken charge of some of Egypt’s biggest and most successful shows.
Film directors have been instructed to focus on shows that praise the military and law enforcement and demonize the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that has been brutally targeted by Sisi, as well as the UAE, which, together with Saudi Arabia, backed his 2013 military coup. The coup toppled Mohamed Morsi, a Brother and Egypt’s first and only democratically-elected president.
Xi’s hopes to promote “core socialist values” such as patriotism, harmony, and civility amounts to an effort to counter individualism, materialism, and hedonism. The campaign involves blurring piercings and jewelry worn by male pop stars during performances on television and the internet, obliging soccer players to wear long sleeves to cover their tattoos, ensuring that women conference hosts raise their necklines, and instructing rappers to restrict their lyrics to promotion of peace and harmony.
Saudi Arabia has argued that journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul six months ago by rogue government operatives who are currently standing trial in a process that lacks transparency, and has called into question the kingdom’s version of events.
The overreach suggests that Middle Eastern autocrats are unlikely to respond to the protests in Algeria and Sudan any differently than they did in 2011.
Analyst Giorgio Cafiero predicts that in the wake of Bouteflika’s resignation, Saudi Arabia is likely to support efforts to maintain control by what Algerians call Le Pouvoir (The Power) or the deep state, a cabal of military and security officials and business tycoons. The same is likely to be true for the UAE.
Whether Algeria’s ancien régime backed by Gulf states is able to retain power may well be dependent on what conclusions protesters draw from the experience of the 2011 revolts.
Like the protesters then, Algerian demonstrators need to decide whether Bouteflika’s resignation is sufficient to justify the surrender of their street power and return to a structured political process.
Indications are that the protesters have learned their lesson.
“Algerians are very realistic. This is a beautiful victory, a tangible first step, but they know that more has to be done. They are not satisfied entirely … they want all of them to be gone,” said Algeria scholar Dalia Ghanem. “Algerians are calling for radical change, a change in leadership. They didn’t want Bouteflika, they don’t want Bouteflika’s family, or Bouteflika’s clan — and they don’t want the old guard to stay in power.”
Dr. James M. Dorsey, a non-resident Senior Associate at the BESA Center, is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University and co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture.
A version of this article was originally published by The BESA Center.