Thursday, May 6th | 24 Iyyar 5781

September 15, 2019 6:33 am

What John Bolton’s Departure Might Signal

avatar by Sarah N. Stern /


US National Security Adviser John Bolton. Photo: Reuters / Joshua Roberts. – I cannot claim to be one of those people not concerned about what this week’s sudden departure of John Bolton from the White House might be signaling. Taken together with last week’s resignation of US Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt, this might be signaling the end of the Trump-Israel honeymoon.

John Bolton has served the United States with distinction in a great many capacities: as National Security Advisor under President Donald Trump, as UN ambassador under President George W. Bush, and as Assistant Attorney General under President Ronald Reagan. He possesses a sober and realistic assessment as to who America’s friends and adversaries truly are, and a sophisticated, no-nonsense view of the multiple threats facing the United States and its allies.

Bolton has projected the doctrine of “peace through strength,” not appeasement. He was a strong supporter of Trump’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which as we now see has only served to enrich, empower, and embolden the Islamic Republic as it continues to carve out a Shi’ite empire that extends through Tehran, Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut through the Mediterranean Coast and into Yemen.

We are seeing the products of the Shiite Crescent’s works as Hezbollah has encroached closer and closer to Israel’s borders and has, as recently as Sept. 2, fired several missiles into Israel, which the Israel Defense Forces successfully intercepted. The Iranians have been giving Hezbollah the means to convert their dummy rockets into precision-guided missiles, which they have been working on in conversion factories in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley.

Related coverage

May 5, 2021 5:11 pm

New York Times Writer Charged as Iranian Agent Is Called ‘Foolish’ by Federal Judge

The New York Times opinion writer accused of serving as an unregistered, paid foreign agent of Iran may have a...

It is the Jewish state’s greatest nightmare that these missiles will become precise enough to hit Israel’s military or civilian infrastructure. Hezbollah has one goal and one goal alone: to eliminate the Jewish state.

This news also comes on the heels of last week’s announcement by the Islamic Republic that it is stepping up enrichment of uranium. The regime is now using the sophisticated, advanced centrifuges that can quickly get to the 20 percent level of purity, making it quite easy to get from that threshold to the lethal 90 percent purity level necessary for a nuclear bomb. This is not a mere technical violation of the JCPOA; it is the entire reason why there was a deal in the first place.

There have been violations all along, including the refusal to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors into military sites. Remember how we had been promised by the Obama administration of “anytime, anywhere inspections”?

In an address just one week before the next round of national elections on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed yet another nuclear site with vivid satellite images in the Iranian city of Abadan that was operational as recently as three months ago, which the Iranians then totally destroyed and covered up. “It’s incredible,” said Netanyahu, “as soon as we reveal they cover their tracks.”

Nevertheless, Trump has signaled a willingness to meet with the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly when it convenes on Sept. 23. The fact that he was willing to meet with the Taliban on US soil and to negotiate with Kim Jong-un of North Korea does not auger well.

Is the president willing to follow French President Emmanuel Macron’s lead and cave on a $15 billion bribe to the Iranians just to have them come to the table?

The Iranian’s response of approval to Trump’s dismissal of Bolton should already warn us how dangerous this move is. On Wednesday, Iranian President Rouhani said, “Americans have to realize that warmongering and warmongers are not to their benefit. They should not only abandon warmongering, but also their maximal pressure campaign.”

If we are to lay culpability anywhere, it should be at the Obama White House, who bequeathed us the legacy of this horrible deal and an emboldened Iranian empire that future world leaders will have to deal with. Obama promised us that Iran would not get a nuclear bomb “on my watch.”

He never promised that Iran would not get a nuclear bomb on another president’s watch.

Following a script that they used at the beginning of the nuclear negotiations with Obama, the Iranians are now playing coy with Trump’s signals to negotiate.

The Iranians invented the Persian souk. They know how to negotiate and to get most of the world to beg them to take our money, just to have them come to the table.

Sarah N. Stern is founder and president of the Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET), a pro-Israel and pro-American think tank and policy institute in Washington, DC.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.