Thursday, March 28th | 18 Adar II 5784

Subscribe
January 27, 2022 12:15 pm
0

European Union Quietly Suspends Funding to Palestinian NGOs, Months After Criticizing Israel Over Terror Designation

× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

avatar by Rachel O'Donoghue

Opinion

European High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell speaks during a meeting via video conference with EU foreign ministers at the European Council in Brussels, Belgium April 19, 2021. Francois Walschaerts/Pool via REUTERS

“We are asking for answers from the Israeli government, and we have not yet received convincing answers. … We need proof of these claims.”

This was the reaction of the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, in response to Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz’s decision in October 2021 to designate six Palestinian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as terror groups due to their ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

The PFLP is well-known for perpetrating endless terrorist atrocities over the decades, and is blacklisted by, among others, the United States and the EU.

Borrell’s remarks – made during a closed-door Ad Hoc Liaison Committee Meeting, which is the international donor group for the Palestinian Authority (PA) – followed a chorus of criticism levied at Israel, including accusations that the government was trying to “muzzle human rights monitoring” and “punish” its detractors.

Quizzed about the Israeli decision at a press briefing, US State Department spokesman Ned Price questioned Israel’s move, and contradicted Jerusalem’s assertion that the Biden administration had been forewarned about the designations.

“We believe respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms, and a strong civil society are critically important to responsible and responsive governance,” Price said.

And in a typically hyperbolic fashion, the United Nations, which announced plans to fund one of the Palestinian NGOs this year, branded the designations a “frontal attack on the Palestinian human rights movement, and on human rights everywhere,” while claiming that such actions are “not what a democracy adhering to well-accepted human rights and humanitarian standards would do.”

The statement from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights also lavished praise on the Palestinian groups:

These organisations speak the language of universal human rights. They use a rights-based approach to their work, including a gendered analysis, to document human rights abuses of all kinds in Palestine, including business-related human rights abuses.

Large segments of the media took a similar line, with news outlets such as the Associated Press, for example, labeling Gantz’s decision “a major escalation of [Israel’s] decades-long crackdown on political activism in the occupied territories.”

It is, therefore, surprising that not much has been said about a new development: the European Commission has quietly suspended EU funding to one of the affected NGOs, al-Haq, in addition to instructing the charity Oxfam to halt funding to another of the groups, the Union of Agricultural Works Committees (UAWC), “until the situation has been clarified.”

Brussels’ decision was revealed in a written question to the Commission submitted by a group of EU parliamentarians.

Meanwhile, the Dutch government also made clear its reservations about the UAWC when it cut funding to the “farming” organization following an independent audit that found numerous ties to the PFLP.

As HonestReporting previously detailed, a seven-month investigation carried out by Proximities Risk Consultancy, of which the results were shared earlier this month with legislators in Brussels, concluded:

  • From 2007 to 2020, there were at least 34 individual links between the UAWC and PFLP. Of these 34, 28 were UAWC board members, and 12 simultaneously held “leading positions” in both organizations.
  • There are also indications of organizational ties between the UAWC and PFLP. There were contacts between representatives, expressions of solidarity, and joint meetings. The UAWC and PFLP also shared buildings. According to the research agency, it is “reasonable to expect the UAWC to be aware of these organi[z]ational ties with the PFLP.”

As is clear, then, evidence is mounting that Israel’s assessment of the existence of ties between NGOs and the PFLP has merit. Indeed, we have covered the issue extensively, thereby ensuring that journalists and lawmakers have access to crucial information that helps inform the policy (see, for example, here and here).

As such, we believe it would be appropriate for media outlets to report on the latest developments.

Moreover, the US State Department might want to follow the EU’s lead by, at the very least, providing an update on its investigation into the activities of these Palestinian NGOs. This is especially true given that Washington has pledged millions of dollars in aid to groups in the West Bank.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.